Confession by the Deed: Asserting Anabaptist Ecclesiopolitical Performativity

References

1. Bantman, Constance. “The Era of Propaganda by the Deed.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism, edited by CarlLevy and Matthew S.Adams, 371-387. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
2. van Hoogstraten, Marius. “Anabaptist Biopolitics: Balthasar Hubmaier on Religious Noncoercion and Church Discipline.” In Free Speech in Early Modern Europe, edited by NinaSchroeder, SilkeMuylaert, and FrancescoQuatrini. St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming.
   [Google Scholar]
3. van Hoogstraten, Marius. “Without Sovereign Guarantee: Reading Schleitheim on the Oath with Giorgio Agamben.”Mennonite Quarterly Review97, no. 4 (2023): 367-382.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Landauer, Gustav. Revolution and Other Writings. Edited and translated by GabrielKuhn. Oakland: PM Press, 2010.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Marchart, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mouffe, Chantal. On the Political. New York: Routledge, 2005.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Prodi, Paolo. “Der Eid in der europäischen Verfassungsgeschichte: Zur Einführung.” In Glaube und Eid: Treueformeln, Glaubensbekenntnisse und Sozialdisziplinierung zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit, edited by PaoloProdi and ElisabethMüller-Luckner, vii-xxix. Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1993.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Snyder, C. Arnold. “The Schleitheim Articles in Light of the Revolution of the Common Man: Continuation or Departure?”The Sixteenth Century Journal16, no. 4 (1985): 419-430.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wenger, John C.“The Schleitheim Confession of Faith.”Mennonite Quarterly Review19, no. 4 (1945): 243-253.
   [Google Scholar]