oa Confessional Divides, Cross-Confessional Connections, and Jewish Responses: Menasseh ben Israel and Daniel Levi de Barrios on De auxiliis and Dordt

References

1. Aichele, Alexander, and MatthiasKaufmann, eds. A Companion to Luis de Molina.Leiden: Brill, 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anfray, Jean-Pascal. “Molina and John Duns Scotus.” In A Companion to Luis de Molina, edited by AlexanderAichele and MatthiasKaufmann, 325–364. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arminius, James [Jacob]. Arminius Speaks: Essential Writings on Predestination, Free Will, and the Nature of God, edited by John D.Wagner. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2011.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bac, J. Martin. Perfect Will Theology: Divine Agency in Reformed Scholasticism as against Suárez, Episcopius, Descartes, and Spinoza.Leiden: Brill, 2010.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ballor, Jordan H., Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, eds. Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.Leiden: Brill, 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ballor, Jordan H., Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma. “Introduction: Augustinian Soteriology in the Context of the ‘Congregatio De Auxiliis’ and the Synod of Dordt.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 1–18. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barrios, Daniel Levi [Miguel] de. Contra la Verdad no Hay Fuerça: Panegirico a los tres bienaventurados martires Abraham Athias, Ahacob Rodriguez Casares, y Raquel Nuñez Fernandez.Amsterdam, 1665.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barrios, Miguel [Daniel Levi] de. Libre Alvedrío y Harmonia del Cuerpo por disposición del Alma.Brussels: David de Castro Tartas, 1680.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beltrán, Miguel. “Judaísmo y Molinismo en el siglo XVII: Consideraciones teológicas en torno al problema del Libre Albedrío.” ’Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones2 (1997): 7–15.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ben-Sasson, Haim Hillel. The Reformation in Contemporary Jewish Eyes. Jerusalem: Ahva Press, 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bodian, Miriam. Hebrews of the Portuguese Nation: Conversos and Community in Early Modern Amsterdam.Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boer, Harm den. “Marrano-Topographie: Die produktive Peripherie des Miguel de Barrios.” In Heimat – Identität – Mobilität in der zeitgenössischen jüdischen Literatur, edited by ChristinaOlszynski, JanSchröder, and Chris W.Wilpert, 17–30. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bunge, Wiep van. Spinoza Past and Present: Essays on Spinoza, Spinozism, and Spinoza Scholarship.Leiden: Brill, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cohen, Gerson D. “Esau as Symbol in Early Medieval Thought.” In Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies, edited by AlexanderAltmann, 19–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Colberg, Shawn M. “Aquinas and the Grace of Auxilium.” Modern Theology32, no. 2 (2016): 187–210.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Coppenhagen, Jacob H.Menasseh ben Israel, Manuel Dias Soeiro, 1604-1657: A Bibliography.Jerusalem: Misgav Yerushalayim, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cossee, Eric H. “Arminius and Rome.” In Arminius, Arminianism, and Europe, edited by Th. Mariusvan Leeuwen, Keith D.Stanglin, and MarijkeTolsma, 73–85. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Craig, William Lane. The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suárez.Leiden: Brill, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
19. David, Abraham. “The Lutheran Reformation in Sixteenth-Century Jewish Historiography.” Jewish Studies Quarterly10, no. 2 (2003): 124–139.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dekker, Eef. Rijker dan Midas: Vrijheid, genade en predestinatie in de theologie van Jacobus Arminius, 1559-1609. Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dekker, Eef. “Was Arminius a Molinist?” The Sixteenth Century Journal27, no. 2 (1996): 337–352.
    [Google Scholar]
22. DeMeuse, Eric J. “‘The World Is Content with Words’: Jansenism between Thomism and Calvinism.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 245–276. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fisher, Benjamin E.Amsterdam’s People of the Book: Jewish Society and the Turn to Scripture in the Seventeenth Century. Cincinnati, OH: Hebrew Union College Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Friedman, Jerome. “The Reformation in Alien Eyes: Jewish Perceptions of Christian Troubles.” The Sixteenth-Century Journal14 (1983): 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gaetano, Matthew T. “Calvin against the Calvinists in Early Modern Thomism.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 297–320. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goudriaan, Aza, and Lieburg, Fred van, eds. Revisiting the Synod of Dordt (1618-1619).Leiden: Brill, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goudriaan, Aza. “Defending Grace: References to Dominicans, Jesuits, and Jansenists in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Reformed Theology.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 277–297. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hackett, Conrad, and Brian J.Grim. “The Global Religious Landscape: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World’s Major Religious Groups as of 2010.” https://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/.
29. Hacohen, Malachi Haim. Jacob and Esau: Jewish European History between Nation and Empire.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hoenderdaal, G. J. “Arminius en Episcopius.” Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis60, no. 2 (1980): 203–235.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ifrah, Lionel. L’Aigle d’Amsterdam: Menasseh ben Israel (1604-1657).Paris: Honoré Champion, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ifrah, Lionel. Sion et Albion: Juifs et puritains attendent le Messie.Paris: Honoré Champion, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Israel, Menasseh ben. De termino vitae libri III. Amsterdam: Menasseh ben Israel, 1639.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Israel, Menasseh ben. Dissertatio de fragilitate humana ex lapsu Adami.Amsterdam: Menasseh ben Israel, 1642.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Israel, Menasseh ben. De la fragilidad humana y inclinación del hombre al peccado.Amsterdam: Menasseh ben Israel, 1642.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Israel, Menasseh ben. The Bible Conciliator: A Reconcilement of the Apparent Contradictions in Holy Scripture, edited by Elias HayyimLindo, 2 vols. Glasgow: Oppenheim1902 [1842].
    [Google Scholar]
37. Itterzon, Gerrit P. van. Franciscus Gomarus.Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1930.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jansen, Cornelius. Augustinus seu doctrina Sancti Augustini de humanae naturae sanitate, aegritudine, medicina adversus Pelagianos et Massilienses. Leuven: Jacob Zegers, 1640.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kaplan, Yosef, HenryMéchoulan, and Richard H.Popkin, eds. Menasseh ben Israel and his World.Leiden: Brill, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kaplan, Yosef. “Wayward New Christians and Stubborn New Jews: The Shaping of a Jewish Identity.” Jewish History8, no. 1-2 (1994): 27–41.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Katz, David S.Philo-Semitism and the Readmission of the Jews to England.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
42. KlatzkinJacob, and ShimonGibson. “Augustine.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd ed., vol. 2, edited by MichaelBerenbaum and FredSkolnik, 658–659. Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2007. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2587501603/GVRL?u=potsdam&sid=GVRL&xid=385be099.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kley, Dale K. van. The Religious Origins of the French Revolution: From Calvin to the Civil Constitution, 1560-1791. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Knebel, Sven K. “Scientia media: Ein diskursarchäologischer Leitfaden durch das 17. Jahrhundert.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte34 (1991): 262–294.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kohler, Kaufmann, and IsaacBroydé. “Predestination.” In The Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. 10, edited by IsidoreSingeret. al., 181–182. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1901-1906. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/12338-predestination.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kooi, Christine. Calvinists and Catholics during Holland’s Golden Age: Heretics and Idolators.New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Leydekker, Melchior. De historia Jansenismi libri IV.Utrecht: Halma, 1695.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lieberman, Julia Rebollo. El teatro alegórico de Miguel (Daniel Levi) de Barrios.Newark, DEL: Juan de la Cuesta, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Litovsky, Haydee. Sephardic Playwrights of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries in Amsterdam.Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
50. McDonald, W. “Congruism.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia, New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1913. https://www.catholicity.com/encyclopedia/c/congruism.html.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Méchoulan, Henry. “Introducción.” In Hispanidad y judaismo en tiempos de Espinoza: Estudio y edición anotada de “La certeza del camino” de Abraham Pereyra, edited by HenryMéchoulan, 1–94. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Méchoulan, Henry. “Introduction: La permanence d’une problématique.” In Menasseh ben Israel. De la fragilité humaine et inclination de l’homme au péché, edited by HenryMéchoulan, 7–71. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Milton, Anthony. “Introduction.” In The British Delegation at the Synod of Dordt, 1618-1619, edited by AnthonyMilton, xvii–lv. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Muller, Richard. God, Creation, and Providence in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Muller, Richard A. “Arminius’s ‘Conference’ with Junius and the Protestant Reception of Molina’s ‘Concordia’.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 103–126. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Mulsow, Martin, and JanRohls, eds. Socinianism and Arminianism: Antitrinitarians, Calvinists and Cultural Exchange in Seventeenth-Century Europe.Leiden: Brill, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Nadler, Steven. Menasseh ben Israel: Rabbi of Amsterdam.New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ogliari, Donato. Gratia et Certamen: The Relationship between Grace and Free Will in the Discussion of Augustine with the So-Called Semipelagians.Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Parker, Charles H.Faith on the Margins: Catholics and Catholicism in the Dutch Golden Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pereyra, Abraham. Espejo de la Vanidad del Mundo.Amsterdam: Alexandro Janse, 1671.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Pereyra, Abraham. Hispanidad y judaismo en tiempos de Espinoza: Estudio y edición anotada de “La certeza del camino” de Abraham Pereyra, edited by HenryMéchoulan. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pieterse, Wilhelmina C.Daniel Levi de Barrios als geschiedschrijver van de Portugees-Israelitische Gemeente te Amsterdam in zijn ‘Triumpho del govierno popular’.Amsterdam: Scheltema, 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Raith, Charles II. “Calvin and Aquinas Reconsidered.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 19–34. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Rauschenbach, Sina. “Gemeinsame Gegner: Zur integrativen Wirkung von Polemik in christlichen Kontroversen der Frühen Neuzeit.” In Religion als Prozess: Begriffe – Zuschreibungen – Leitmotive – Grenzen, edited by ThomasKirsch, RudolfSchlögl, and DorotheaWeltecke, 159–171. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Rauschenbach, Sina. Judaism for Christians: Menasseh ben Israel (1604-1657).Lanham: Lexington, 2019 [2012].
    [Google Scholar]
66. Remonstrantie 1610.https://www.remonstranten.nl/wiki/remonstranten-vroeger/remonstrantie-1610/.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Riel, Cornelius Gerardus van. Beitrag zur Geschichte der Congregationes de Auxiliis.Konstanz: Stadler Verlag, 1921.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Ruhstorfer, Karlheinz. “Der Gnadenstreit ‘de auxiliis’ im Kontext.” In Der Jansenismus – eine ‘katholische Häresie’? Das Ringen um Gnade, Rechtfertigung und die Autorität Augustins in der frühen Neuzeit, edited by DominikBurkard and TanjaThanner, 57–69. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Scholberg, Kenneth R., ed. La poesia religiosa de Miguel de Barrios.Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Scholberg, Kenneth R., and YomTov Assis. “Barrios, Daniel Levi (Miguel) de.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd ed., vol. 3, edited by MichaelBerenbaum and FredSkolnik, 176–177. Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2007. link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2587502087/GVRL?u=potsdam&sid=GVRL&xid=2710d40e.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Stanglin, Keith D. “Arminius and Arminianism: An Overview of Current Research.” In Arminius, Arminianism, and Europe: Jacobus Arminius (1559/60-1609), edited by Th. Marius vanLeeuwen, Keith D.Stanglin, and MarijkeTolsma, 3–24. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Stanglin, Keith D., and Thomas H.McCall. Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Stanglin, Keith D. “‘Scientia Media’: the Protestant Reception of a Jesuit Idea.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 148–168. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Sutcliffe, Adam. “The Conservative Hybridity of Miguel de Barrios.” In Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Honor of David B. Ruderman, edited by Richard I.Cohen, Natalie B.Dohrmann, AdamShear, and ElchananReiner, 205–215. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sytsma, David S. “Aquinas in Service of Dordt: John Davenant on Predestination, Grace, and Free Choice.” In Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’: The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, edited by Jordan H.Ballor, Matthew T.Gaetano, and David S.Sytsma, 149–199. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Tyacke, Nicholas. Anti-Calvinists: The Rise of English Arminianism, 1590-1640.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]