2004
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

Addressing biological sex and sociocultural gender differences in health and illness is essential to deliver high quality of care to both men and women. Sex and gender issues should therefore be structurally integrated in medical education. An often-used strategy to implement these issues is gender mainstreaming, which aims to reduce gender bias and change existing practices by involving regular actors in education. While gender mainstreaming projects have been carried out throughout medical schools in the Netherlands, and despite reports of success, evaluations also demonstrate gender mainstreaming’s limitations. We therefore critically analysed the projects using Squires’ three gender mainstreaming strategies: inclusion, reversal, or displacement. We conclude that the projects mainly applied inclusion and reversal, and hardly used displacement, suggesting that structural change has not been fostered. Increasing implementation efforts at a management level, an additional focus on other aspects of diversity (diversity mainstreaming), and establishing larger coalitions may offer new opportunities for change in medical education.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.VERD
2016-06-01
2021-11-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/19/2/06_TVGN2016.2.VERD.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.VERD&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2016.2.VERD
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diversity; gender; gender mainstreaming; medical education; sex
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error