2004
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2020.3.006.HOEG
2020-09-01
2022-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/23/3/09_TVGN2020.3_HOEG.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2020.3.006.HOEG&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Benvindo, B.(2005). Des hommes en guerre. Les soldats belges entre ténacité et désillusion, 1914–1918, Brussels: Archives générales du Royaume.
  2. Bevernage, B.(2005). Academische mannenstudies en feministische theorievorming. Verslagen van het centrum voor Genderstudies, 14, 25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buerman, T.(2007). Maten, makkers, masculiniteit! Historisch onderzoek naar mannelijkheid. Mededelingenblad BVNG, 29(1), 21–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, J.(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
  5. De Smaele, H.(2016). Achilles or Adonis: Controversies surrounding the male body as national symbol in Georgian England. Gender and History, 28(1), 77–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dudink, S.(1998). The trouble with men: Problems in the history of masculinity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1), 419–431.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Haraway, D. & TerranovaF.. (2016). Storytelling for Earthly Survival.
  8. Haraway, D.(1991). A cyborg manifesto. In D.Haraway, Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Haraway, D.(2007). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  10. Hearn, J.(2000). Men, (pro) feminism, organizing and organizations. LTA, 3, 350–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoegaerts, J.(2006). Sous l’empire de la jalousie: de constructie van gehuwde mannelijkheid in laat-negentiende-eeuwse echtscheidingsprocedures in Vlaanderen, een case studie. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 3(9), 19–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kahn, A. & Onion, R. (2016, 6 januari). Is history written about men, by men? A careful study of recent popular history books reveals a genre dominated by generals, presidents—and male authors. Slate.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Katto, J.(2019). Women’s lived landscapes of war and liberation in Mozambique: Bodily memory and the gendered aesthetics of belonging. New York: Routledge.
  14. Kristeva, J.(1979). Le temps des femmes. Cahiers de recherche de sciences des textes et documents, 5, 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Samuels, E.(2017). Six ways of looking at crip time. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Scott, J.(1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. St Pierre, J.(2015). Distending straight-masculine time: A phenomenology of the disabled speaking body. Hypatia, 30(1), 49–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tosh, J.(1994). What should historians do with masculinity?History Workshop Journal, 38, 179–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Molle, L.(2004). De nieuwe vrouwenbeweging in Vlaanderen, een andere lezing. Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Osselaer, T.(2013). The pious sex. Catholic constructions of masculinity and femininity in Belgium, c. 1800–1940. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  21. Vega, Judith A.(2002). Gender, politiek, geschiedenis. Reflecties op een trias. Groniek. Historisch Tijdschrift, 158/159, 9–30.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2020.3.006.HOEG
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error