2004
Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

As a consequence of the institutional preconditions applying to the strategic manoeuvring taking place in specific communicative activity types, certain context-dependent argumentative patterns of standpoints, argument schemes and argumentation structures can be observed in argumentative discourse. Pragma-dialecticians are interested in discovering these patterns and in determining to what extent they are stereotypical of the communicative activity types associated with a specific communicative domain. This paper concentrates on the way in which argumentation by analogy manifests itself in argumentative practice and the stereotypical argumentative patterns it is part of in various communicative domains. In the process, the pragma-dialectical view of argumentation by analogy is explained.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2014.1.EEME
2014-05-01
2021-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/36/1/s3.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2014.1.EEME&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2014.1.EEME
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2014.1.EEME
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error