2004
Volume 38, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

Abstract

Recently, there has been (and still is) a lot of discussion about the replicability of scientific findings. Hornikx and Batenburg (2016) try to explain the non-replicability in science, and discuss the situation for language research. We make the point that empirically sound conclusions will contribute to the replicability of science. In this commentary, we discuss several practices that will help the empirical language researcher to draw more solid conclusions from their data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.EERL
2016-09-01
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/38/2/04_TVT2016.2.EERL.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.EERL&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.EERL
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): experimental design; replicability
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error