2004
Volume 38, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

Abstract

In their contribution Hornikx and Batenburg (2016) raise a number of issues related to the transparency and integrity of quantitative research in particular. In this contribution two additional issues are raised that may hinder the accessibility and accountability of our research results. One is related to studies based on the use of confidential materials – especially in the context of qualitative studies – and the other to the implications of the new ‘meldplicht datalekken’ (the duty to report data leaks) that has been introduced in the Netherlands per January 1, 2016, as part of the Personal Data Protection Act. Together they demonstrate the limits of our strive for scientific transparency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.SPOO
2016-09-01
2022-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/38/2/11_TVT2016.2.SPOO.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.SPOO&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.SPOO
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): confidentiality; data transparancy; legal restrictions
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error