2004
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

Abstract

In the lead article, Carel Jansen argues that practical issues in professional communication should be taken as source for academic research on language and communication. I first accept the claim that it is important for the research field to take the professional field of communication into account (1). I then explain why practical solution based on academic research usually take so long to develop (2). My opinions partly also diverge from Jansen, at least in two ways. I argue that researchers in language and communication already incorporate practice into their studies (3). Finally I will discuss a number of problems that seem to occur in applied research (4).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2018.2.004.HORN
2018-12-01
2021-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/40/2/04_TVT2018.2_HORN.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2018.2.004.HORN&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Evans, J.St.B.T.(2012). Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 18 (1), 5-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Faber-De Lange, B., & Pool, E.van der(2015). De communicatief competente professional in de ogen van managers: Een kwalitatieve exploratie als input voor curriculumontwikkeling. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37 (3), 217-239.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hahn, U., & Hornikx, J.(2016). A normative framework for argument quality: Argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation. Synthese, 193 (6), 1833-1873.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hornikx, J.(2018). Combining anecdotal and statistical evidence in real-life discourse: Comprehension and persuasiveness. Discourse Processes, 55 (3), 324-336.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hornikx, J., & Hoeken, H.(2007). Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence quality. Communication Monographs, 74 (4), 443-463.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jansen, C.(1999). Zo werkt dat: Het ontwerp van instructieve teksten. Oratie KU Nijmegen. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kramer, F., & Kruiningen, J. van(2015). Moeilijker, langer, serieuzer: Reflecties van eerstejaarsstudenten over schrijven in een academische setting. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37 (2), 187-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leeuwen, M. van(2015). Taalkundig-stilistische analyse: De casus Wilders / Pechtold. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37 (1), 33-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Oaksford, M. & Chater, N.(Red.)(2010). Cognition and conditionals: Probability and logic in human thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Poppel, L. van(2015). De analyse van strategisch manoeuvreren met pragmatische argumenten. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 37 (1), 5-31.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2018.2.004.HORN
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2018.2.004.HORN
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error