oa The COSYCO Concept: an Indicator for COmparing SYstem COnfigurations

References

1. Alzeban, A. and Gwilliam, D., 2014. Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74–86.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonsen, S., Almklov, P., & Fenstad, J. (2008). Reducing the gap between procedures and practice–lessons from a successful safety intervention. Safety science monitor, 12(1), 1–16.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arenius, M., & Sträter, O. (2013). Resilience engineering in railways—results from a systemic accident and event analysis in German railways in Steenbergen, R. D. J. M., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M., Miraglia, D. & Vrouwenvelder, A. C. W. M. (Eds), Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon, 423–428.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blandford, A., Furniss, D., & Vincent, C. (2014). Patient safety and interactive medical devices: realigning work as imagined and work as done. Clinical risk, 20(5), 107-110.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Borys, D. (2012). The role of safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. Safety science, 50(2), 210–220.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61–74.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bourrier, M. (1996). Organizing maintenance work at two American nuclear power plants. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 4(2), 104–112.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., & Dokas, I. M. (2016a). Introducing RiskSOAP to communicate the distributed situation awareness of a system about safety issues: an application to a robotic system. Ergonomics, 59(3), 409–422.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., & Dokas, I. M. (2016b). RiskSOAP: introducing and applying a methodology of risk self-awareness in road tunnel safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 90, 118–127.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., Karanikas, N., & Plioutsias, A. (2017). Application of STPA on Small Drone Operations: A Benchmarking Approach. Procedia Engineering, 179, 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chatzimihailidou, M. M., Karanikas, N. & Dokas, I. (2016). Measuring Safety Through the Distance Between System States with the RiskSOAP Indicator. Proceedings of the 1st International Cross-industry Safety Conference, Amsterdam, 3-4 November 2016, Journal of Safety Studies, 2(2), 5–17. doi:10.5296/jss.v2i2.10436.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chatzimichailidou, M. M., Stanton, N. A., & Dokas, I. M. (2015). The concept of risk situation awareness provision: towards a new approach for assessing the DSA about the threats and vulnerabilities of complex socio-technical systems. Safety science, 79, 126–138.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clay-Williams, R., Hounsgaard, J., & Hollnagel, E. (2015). Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines. Implementation Science, 10(1), 125.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dekker, A.H. and Colbert, B.D., 2004, January. Network robustness and graph topology. In Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on Computer science-Volume 26 (pp. 359–368). Australian Computer Society, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dekker, S. W., Suparamaniam, N., & Veritas, D. D. N. (2005). Divergent images of decision making in international disaster relief work. Ljungbyhed, Sweden: Lund University School of Aviation.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Horwitz, B. (2003). The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage, 19(2), 466–470.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Bach, K. (1950). "Social pressures in informal groups". New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jones, Kevin K., (2013). "The Impact of Legislation on the Organization: Evaluating the Impact of Corporate Governance Regulation on the Internal Audit Function". (Dissertation) USA: Georgia State University. Retrieved 5 October 2017 from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/bus_admin_diss/22.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Leveson, N. (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. USA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lundberg, H. (2008). Geographical proximity effects and regional strategic networks (Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala Universiteit. Retrieved 10 Septmber 2017 from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:171790/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mason, K., & Chakrabarti, R. (2017). The role of proximity in business model design: Making business models work for those at the bottom of the pyramid. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Newcomb, T.M. (1960). Varieties of interpersonal attraction. In D.Cartwright & A.Zander (Eds.), "Group dynamics: Research and theory" (2nd ed., pp. 104–119).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Plioutsias, A., Karanikas, N., & Chatzimihailidou, M. M. (2017). Hazard Analysis and Safety Requirements for Small Drone Operations: To What Extent Do Popular Drones Embed Safety?. Risk Analysis, doi:10.1111/risa.12867.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Stanton, N. A. (2014). Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth. Ergonomics, 57(3), 403–418.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Woltjer, R., Pinska-Chauvin, E., Laursen, T., & Josefsson, B. (2015). Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 115–130.
    [Google Scholar]