2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Law, Religion and State
  4. Volume 4, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The essay argues that religion is a much “fuller” concept than equality, as substantial and weighty as equality is derivative and hollow. The empty, tautological, misleading, but rhetorically powerful nature of equality was compellingly demonstrated by Peter Westen, a generation ago. It is ironic that, despite the manifest inadequacy of equality as an independent good, in the increasingly strident clashes between religionists and those asserting claims based on equal treatment, or freedom from discrimination, the former tend to lose on the whole. All rights are said to be on the same level. As the courts repeatedly pronounce, there is no hierarchy. But the empirical experience of the belies that assertion. This essay seeks to return the contest to a more even playing field by demystifying some of the ascendant-like claims of equality in contemporary rights disputes.

© 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00402002
2016-06-23
2025-12-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/4/2/22124810_004_02_S002_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00402002&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Westen, supra note 1, 577.
     [Google Scholar]
  2.  Westen, supra note 1, 544.
     [Google Scholar]
  3.  Westen book, supra note 1, 25.
     [Google Scholar]
  4.  Westen, supra note 1, 547.
     [Google Scholar]
  5.  Westen, supra note 15, 1161.
     [Google Scholar]
  6.  Westen, supra note 1, 560.
     [Google Scholar]
  7.  Westen, supra note 1, 542.
     [Google Scholar]
  8.  Western, supra note 15, 1165. The fuller argument is in Westen, “Meaning of Equality in Law, Science Math and Morals”, supra note 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  9.  Western, supra note 15, 1165.
     [Google Scholar]
  10.  See Steven D. Smith, “The Red Herring of ‘Marriage Equality’”, Public Discourse, March 27, 2013: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/03/7912/and Lawrence Alexander, “Judicial Activism: Clearing the Air and the Head” in Luis Coutinho et al. (eds.), Judicial Activism (2015), 15, 19. Professor Alexander (ibid.) contends: “It surely takes a good deal of judicial immodesty to say that a legislature that adheres to a traditional and widely-held definition of marriage violates the vague and quite contestable standard of ‘equality.’” My own views are similar: Ahdar, “Finding true essence of marriage”, Dominion-Post, April 8, 2013: http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/comment/8521106/Finding-true-essence-of-marriage.
     [Google Scholar]
  11.  Greenwalt, supra 10,1176.
     [Google Scholar]
  12.  Sarnoff, supra note 34, 390.
     [Google Scholar]
  13.  Westen, supra note 10, 1205.
     [Google Scholar]
  14.  Greenawalt, supra note 3, 1177.
     [Google Scholar]
  15.  Westen, supra note 12, 658.
     [Google Scholar]
  16.  Westen, supra note 12, 659.
     [Google Scholar]
  17.  Westen book, supra note 1, 287.
     [Google Scholar]
  18.  Westen, supra note 12, 607; Westen book, supra note 1, 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  19.  Westen, supra note 1, 580.
     [Google Scholar]
  20.  Sarnoff, supra note33, 384.
     [Google Scholar]
  21.  Peters, supra note 38, 818.
     [Google Scholar]
  22.  Smith, supra note 91, 203. The parenthetical examples are mine.
     [Google Scholar]
  23.  Evans, supra note 98, 9.
     [Google Scholar]
  24.  Mutua, ibid., 627.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00402002
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): equal treatment; Equality; hierarchies of rights; religious freedom

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error