Sites of violence and their communities: critical memory studies in the post-human era | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2666-5050

Samenvatting

Abstract 

“Sites of Violence and their Communities” presents the results of a research project that brought together scholars and practitioners of memory work in an attempt to critically reinterpret the links between sites, their (human, and non-human) users, and memory. These interdisciplinary discussions focused on overlooked, repressed or ignored sites of violence that may benefit from new approaches to memory studies, approaches that go beyond the traditional focus on communication, symbolism, representation and communality. Clandestine or contested sites, in particular, pose challenging questions about memory practices and policies: about the status of unacknowledged victims and those who witnessed their deaths; about those who have inherited the position of “bystander”; about the ontology of human remains; and about the ontologies of the sites themselves, with the natural and communal environments implicated in their perdurance. Claude Lanzmann – one of the first to undertake rigorous research on abandoned, uncommemorated or clandestine sites of violence – responded to Pierre Nora’s seminal conception with his work and with the critical notion of “non-lieux de mémoire.” Methodologies emerging from more traditional as well as recently introduced perspectives (like forensic, ecological, and material ones) allowed team members to engage with such “non-sites of memory” from new angles. The goal was to consider the needs and interests of post-conflict societies; to identify and critically read unofficial transmissions of memory; and to re-locate memory in new contexts – in the grassroots of social, political and institutional processes where the human, post-human and natural merge with unanticipated mnemonic dynamics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3897/hmc.1.63263
2021-11-23
2024-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/26665050/1/1/HMC_1_63263.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.3897/hmc.1.63263&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AndersonP (2004) Union Sucrée. London Review of Books. 23 September. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v26/n18/perry-anderson/union-sucree
  2. AnstettÉDreyfusJ-M (2017) Human Remains and Identification.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 264 pp. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526125019
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AssmannA (1999) Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. C.H.Beck, Munich, 424 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AugéM (1992) Non-lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité.Le Seuil, Paris, 155 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BalM (1999) Narrative inside out: Louise Bourgeois’ Spider as Theoretical Object.Oxford Art Journal2: 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/22.2.101
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BogumiłZGłowacka-GrajperM (2019) Milieux de mémoire in Late Modernity. Local Communities, Religion and Historical Politics.Peter Lang, Bern, 298 pp. https://doi.org/10.3726/b15596
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BoisY-AHollierDKraussRDamischH (1998) A Conversation with Hubert Damisch.October8: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/779179
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ButlerJ (2009) Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? Verso, London, 193 pp.
  9. ColeT (2016) Holocaust Landscapes.Bloomsbury, London, 272 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ColeTKnowlesAKGiordanoA [Eds] (2014) Geographies of the Holocaust.Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 260 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DavidL (2017) Against Standardization of Memory.Human Rights Quarterly39(2): 296–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2017.0019
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DesboisP (2007) Porteur de mémoires: sur les traces de la Shoah par balles.Michel Lafon, Paris, 325 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Didi-HubermanG (1998) Phasmes. Essais sur l’apparition.Minuit, Paris, 256 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DomańskaE (2017) Nekros. Wprowadzenie do ontologii martwego ciała.PWN, Warszawa, 370 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DwyerOJ (2004) Symbolic Accretion and Commemoration.Social & Cultural Geography3: 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000252804
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DziubanZ [Ed.] (2017) Mapping the “Forensic Turn”: Engagements with Materialities of Mass Death in Holocaust Studies and Beyond.New Academic Press, Wien, 368 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. EngelkingBGrabowskiJ [Eds] (2018) Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski.Centrum Badań nad Zagładą Żydów, Warszawa, vol. 1; 868 pp; vol. 2, 832 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. EisenhuthSSabrowM [Eds] (2017) Schattenorte: Stadtimages und Vergangenheitslast.Wallstein, Göttingen, 184 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ErllA (2011a) Memory in culture. Transl. Young SB.Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 218 pp. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ErllA (2011b) Travelling Memory.Parallax4: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2011.605570
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ForensicArchitecture [Eds] (2014) Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth.Sternberg Press, Berlin, 763 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. FrançoisESchulzeH [Eds] (2001) Deutsche Erinnerungsorte. I–III. C.H.Beck, München, 2250 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. GłowackaD (2016) Współ-pamięć, pamięć ‘negatywna’ i dylematy przekładu w ‘wycinkach’ z Shoah Claude’a Lanzmanna.Teksty Drugie6: 297–311. https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2016.6.17
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HaydenD (1997) The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History.MIT Press, Boston, 316 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. HirszowiczMNeymanE (2001) Społeczne ramy niepamięci. Kultura i Społeczeństwo 3–4: 23–48.
  26. HirszowiczMNeymanE (2007) The Social Framing of Non-Memory.International Journal of Sociology1: 74–88. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659370105
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HuyssenA (1997) The Voids of Berlin.Critical Inquiry1: 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1086/448867
    [Google Scholar]
  28. International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (2015) Killing Sites – Research and Remembrance.Metropol Verlag, Berlin, 324 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. KaplanBA (2010) Landscapes of Holocaust Postmemory.Routledge, New York, 272 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842270
    [Google Scholar]
  30. KilAMałczyńskiJWolskaD (2017) Ku laboratorium humanistycznemu.Teksty Drugie1: 274–285. https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2017.1.23
    [Google Scholar]
  31. KwiatkowskiPT (2009) Społeczne tworzenie zbiorowej niepamięci. In: NijakowskiLM (Ed.) Etniczność, pamięć, asymilacja.Wokół problemów zachowania tożsamości mniejszości narodowych i etnicznych w Polsce. Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa, 90–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Laarsevan der RMazzucchelliFReijnenC [Eds] (2014) Traces of Terror, Signs of Trauma: Practices of (re)presentation of Collective Memories in Space in Contemporary Europe. Versus: Quaderni di Studi Semiotici 119, 180 pp.
  33. LaCapraD (1997) , Lanzman’s “Shoah”: Here There Is No Why.Critical Inquiry2: 231–269. https://doi.org/10.1086/448828
    [Google Scholar]
  34. LanzmannC (1990) Les Non-Lieux de la Mémoire. In: DeguyM (Ed.) Au sujet de Shoah: Le Film de Claude Lanzmann.Éditions Berlin, Paris, 280–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. LanzmannC (2007) Site and Speech. Transl. Liebman S. In: LiebmanS (Ed.) Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah.Key Essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 37–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. LanzmannCGantheretF (1986) L’Entretien de Claude Lanzmann, Les non-lieux de mémoire.Nouvelle Revue de Psychanalyse33: 293–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. LehrerET (2018) From ‘Heritage Communities’ to ‘Communities of Implication’. Traces Journal. http://www.traces.polimi.it/index.html@p=3595.html
  38. LiebeskindD (2003) Trauma. In: HornsteinSJacobowitzF (Eds) Image and Remembrance: Representation and the Holocaust.Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 43–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LubańskaM (2017) Postmemory of Killings in the Woods at Dębrzyna (1945–46): A Postsecular Anthropological Perspective.Ethnologia Polona38: 15–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MacdonaldS (2008) Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond.Routledge, London, 228 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MałczyńskiJ (2018) Krajobrazy Zagłady. Perspektywa historii środowiskowej.IBL PAN, Warszawa, 246 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MałczyńskiJDomańskaESmykowskiMKłosA (2020) The Environmental History of the Holocaust.Journal of Genocide Research2: 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2020.1715533
    [Google Scholar]
  43. MälksooM (2015) “Memory Must Be Defended”: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security.Security Dialoguge3: 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MorinaCThijsK (2018) Probing the Limits of Categorization: The Bystander in Holocaust History.Berghahn Books, New York, 382 pp. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8
    [Google Scholar]
  45. NoraP (1984–1992) Les Lieux de mémoire, vol. I–III.Gallimard, Paris, 4800 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. NoraP (1989) Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire. Transl. Roudebush M.Representation26: 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
    [Google Scholar]
  47. NowakJKapralskiSNiedźwiedzkiD (2018) On the Banality of Forgetting: Tracing the Memory of Jewish Culture in Poland.Peter Lang, Bern, 276 pp. https://doi.org/10.3726/b14412
    [Google Scholar]
  48. OttoL (2009) Postcommunist Museums: Terrorspaces and Traumascapes. In: Kjeldbæk E (Ed.) The Power of the Object: Museums and World War II.MuseumsEtc, Edinburgh, 424 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. PirkerRRodePLichtenwagnerM (2019) From palimpsest to me-moiré: Exploring urban memorial landscapes of political violence. Political Geography 74: 102057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102057
  50. PollackM (2014) Kontaminierte Landschaften: Unruhe bewahren.Residenz Verlag, Salzburg, 120 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. RapsonJ (2015) Topographies of Suffering: Buchenwald, Babi Yar, Lidice.Berghan Books, New York, 242 pp. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qcxfx
    [Google Scholar]
  52. RothbergM (2010) Introduction: Between Memory and Memory: From Lieux de mémoire to Noeuds de mémoire. Yale French Studies 118/119: 3–12.
  53. RothbergM (2019) The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators.Stanford University Press, Stanford, 288 pp. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609600
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Saryusz-WolskaM (2011) Spotkania czasu z miejscem. Studia o pamięci i miastach.Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 448 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. SchmidtP (2004) Zwischen Medien und Topoi. Die Lieux de mémoire und die Medialität des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. In: ErllANünningA (Eds) Medien des kollektiven Gedächtnisses.Konstruktivität – Historizität – Kulturspezifität. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, New York, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110201789.2.25
    [Google Scholar]
  56. SendykaR (2014) Prism. Understanding Non-Sites of Memory. Transl. Croft J. In: BoyerJWMoldenB (Eds) EUtROPEs: the paradox of European empire.University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 183–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. SendykaR (2016a) Sites That Haunt: Affects and Non-sites of Memory.East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures4: 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325416658950
    [Google Scholar]
  58. SendykaR (2016b) Niepamięć albo o sytuowaniu wiedzy o formach pamiętania.Teksty Drugie6: 250–267. https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2016.6.14
    [Google Scholar]
  59. SendykaR (2018) Caduca, or es(cheat)ed heritage. Traces Journal. http://www.traces.polimi.it/2018/07/26/caduca-or-escheated-heritage/
  60. SnyderT (2010) Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin.Basic Books, New York, 534 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. StolerLA (2011) Colonial Aphasia: Race and Disabled Histories in France.Public Culture1: 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2010-018
    [Google Scholar]
  62. SzczepanA (2014) Krajobrazy postpamięci.Teksty Drugie1: 103–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. TaiH-TH (2001) Remembered Realms: Pierre Nora and French National Memory.The American Historical Review3: 906–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/2692331
    [Google Scholar]
  64. TumarkinM (2015) Traumascapes: The Power and Fate of Places Transformed by Tragedy.Melbourne University, Melbourne 2005, 279 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. VioliP (2012) Trauma Site Museums and Politics of Memory. Tuol Sleng, Villa Grimaldi and the Bologna Ustica Museum.Theory, Culture & Society1: 36–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411423035
    [Google Scholar]
  66. WebberJ (2015) A Jew, a Cemetery, and a Polish Village: A Tale of the Restoration of Memory. In: LehrerETMengM (Eds) Jewish Space in Contemporary Poland.Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 238–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. WeizmanE (2017) Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability.Zone books, New York, 376 pp. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14gphth
    [Google Scholar]
  68. ZarembaM (2012) Wielka trwoga. Polska 1944–1947. Ludowa reakcja na kryzys.Znak, Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN, Kraków, 700 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3897/hmc.1.63263
Loading
/content/journals/10.3897/hmc.1.63263
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error