2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2589-6725
  • E-ISSN: 2589-6733

Abstract

Abstract

Safety culture has been a topic of discussion in safety literature in the past three decades. Since its first mentioning after the Chernobyl accident much have been written about what fosters a positive safety culture within organizations. The Aviation Academy of the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences conducted a literature review into safety culture development guidelines and identified a list of 37 prerequisites for safety culture development. Existing safety culture assessment tools target to measure the subjective perceptions of the workforce without examining the parameters affecting safety culture. Thus, they cannot be used to provide the organisations with guidance on the action points for improving their safety culture. To accommodate the need for practical guidance to companies, and as part of four-year research into Aviation Safety Metrics, the Aviation Academy has developed the AVAC-SCP tool, which aims to shed light on the planning and implementation for developing a safety culture. Knowledge experts and companies have reviewed the tool as a means to meet various criteria referred to literature with regards to safety metrics. The tool will enable organisations to derive actionable points from the results. A scoring method is included in the AVAC-SCP in order provide organizations with the ability to monitor their performance over time, compare between departments, and prioritize changes. The concept, academic background, reviews and other characteristics of the AVAC-SCP are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.008.PIRI
2018-05-01
2021-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/25896725/1/1/08_ADV2018.1.PIRI.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.008.PIRI&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dekker, S. (2011). Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FAA
    FAA. (2006).Introduction to Safety Management Systems for Air Operators. Advisory Circular 120- 92. USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J.M., Vázquez-Ordás, C.J. (2007). Safety culture: analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. J. Saf. Res.38(6), 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordon, R., Kirwan, B. (2004). Developing a safety culture in a research and development environment: air traffic management domain. In: European Chapter of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grolleman, G. (2017). Aviation Academy Tool for Assessing Safety Culture Development (Unpublished Bachelor Thesis). The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nemeth, C.P., Hollnagel, E. (2014): Resilience Engineering in Practice, Volume 2: Becoming Resilient. UK: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ICAO
    ICAO (2013). Doc 9859, Safety Management Manual (SMM) (3rd ed.) Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Karanikas, N., Soltani, P., de Boer, R. J., Roelen, A., & Dekker, S. (2015). Prerequisites for Safety Culture Development, Technical Report X10910/B. The Netherlands: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Aviation Academy.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A.L.C., Piric, S., & de Boer, R. J. (2016a). Review of Existing Aviation Safety Metrics, RAAK PRO Project: Measuring Safety in Aviation, Project S10931. The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A.L.C., Piric, S., van Aalst, R. & de Boer, R. J. (2016b). Results from Surveys about Existing Aviation Safety Metrics, RAAK PRO Project: Measuring Safety in Aviation, Project S10931. The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A., Piric, S., van Aalst, R., de Boer, R. J.(2016c). Exploring the Diversity in Safety Measurement Practices: Empirical Results from Aviation. Proceedings of the 1st International Cross-industry Safety Conference, Amsterdam, 3-4 November 2016, Journal of Safety Studies, 2(2), 18–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leveson, N. (2015). A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 136, 17–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NLR
    NLR (2016). ASC-IT: Seven steps to improve your safety culture. NLR-CR-2016-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Parker, D., Lawrie, M., Hudson, P. (2006). A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Saf. Sci.44(6), 551–562.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Reason, J. (1998). Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress12(3), 293–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Saurin, T.A., Righi, A., Henriqson, E. (2013). Characteristics of complex socio-technical systems and guidelines for their management: the role of resilience. In: 5th Resilience Engineering Association Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sellers, R. (2015). The influence, measurement, and development of organizational safety culture. J. Int. Soc. Air Saf. Invest. 16–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wiegmann, D.A., Zhang, H., von Thaden, T., Sharma, G., Mitchell, A. (2002). A synthesis of safety culture and safety climate research. Technical Report ARL-02-3/FAA-02-2. University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.008.PIRI
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.008.PIRI
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Safety Culture; Safety Culture Assessment; Safety Culture Prerequisites
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error