2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. The Annual Review for the Sciences of the Democracies
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2950-3582
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This research note examines the concept of parasitical solidarity, a term borrowed and re-developed from Sally Scholz’s work, to address the phenomenon of misappropriated solidarity. By further developing the concept of parasitical solidarity, it aims to provide empirical researchers with a robust framework for analysing specific practices and institutions. The concept of parasitical solidarity proposed here captures instances where solidarity is misappropriated to further nefarious interests rather than genuinely supporting oppressed groups or fighting an injustice. After outlining the theoretical foundations of solidarity and discussing its ontological, normative, and empirical dimensions, this paper highlights the limitations and dangers associated with solidaristic practices. It also gives guidance as to how the concept of parasitical solidarity can be applied to real-world phenomena, using the examples of the GameStop incident of 2021 and the Brexit vote in 2016. Ultimately, this note seeks to contribute to a better understanding of solidarity’s role in society and its potential misappropriation, thereby empowering social scientists to critically reflect on solidarity across interpersonal, group, and institutional levels.

© Elias Weiss.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/DEMO2025.1.003.WEI
2025-08-20
2025-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/29503582/1/1/DEMO2025.1.003.WEI.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/DEMO2025.1.003.WEI&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aharon, David Y., et al. “Did David Win a Battle or the War Against Goliath? Dynamic Return and Volatility Connectedness between the GameStop Stock and the High Short Interest Indices.” Social Science Research Network, no. 3788155, 18 Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3788155.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alharbi, Ahlam, and MaryRucker. “Discursive Practices of the Performative Theory of Solidarity Discourse.” Language Sciences, vol. 95, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101515.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, Franklin, et al. “Squeezing Shorts Through Social Media Platforms.” Social Science Research Network, no. 3823151, 17 Aug. 2022, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3823151.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Artaraz, Kepa, et al. “Introduction: Vivir Bien/Buen Vivir and Post-Neoliberal Development Paths in Latin America: Scope, Strategies, and the Realities of Implementation.” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 48, no. 3, May 2021, pp. 4–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211009461.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arts, Wil, and JohnGelissen. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?” Acta Sociologica, vol. 44, no. 4, Dec. 2001, pp. 283–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayertz, Kurt. Solidarity. Springer, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergmark, Åke. “Solidarity in Universal Welfare—The Case of Sweden.” Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe, edited by RuudterMeulen et al., Springer, 2001, pp. 373–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_17.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Burelli, Carlo, and FrancescoCamboni. “The Function of Solidarity and Its Normative Implications.” Ethics and Global Politics, vol. 16, no. 3, 2023, pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2023.2241678.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cantoni, Davide, et al. “Protests.” Annual Review of Economics, vol. 16, Aug. 2024, pp. 519–43, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082423-032519.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro, Andrene, et al. “Drawn Into Policy: A Systematic Review of School Rezoning Rationales, Processes, and Outcomes.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 94, no. 4, Aug. 2024, pp. 539–83, https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231195816.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chatzidakis, Andreas, and JoLittler. “An Anatomy of Carewashing: Corporate Branding and the Commodification of Care during Covid-19.” International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 25, no. 3–4, July 2022, pp. 268–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211065474.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chohan, Usman W. “Counter-Hegemonic Finance: The Gamestop Short Squeeze.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775127.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chowdhury, Jahid Siraz, et al. “Ubuntu Philosophy: ‘I Am Because We Are’—A Road to ‘Individualism’ to Global Solidarity.” Handbook of Research on the Impact of COVID-19 on Marginalized Populations and Support for the Future, IGI Global, 2021, pp. 361–81, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7480-5.ch022.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. deFreitas Netto, SebastiãoVieira, et al. “Concepts and Forms of Greenwashing: A Systematic Review.” Environmental Sciences Europe, vol. 32, no. 1, Feb. 2020, p. 19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dell’Amico, Anna. “Human Rights Abuses from Carbon Credits—A Critique of ‘Greenwashing’ Lawsuits and Additional Litigation Techniques.” Environmental Law Journal, 15 Jan. 2024, https://nyuelj.org/2024/01/human-rights-abuses-from-carbon-credits-a-critique-of-greenwashing-lawsuits-and-additional-litigation-techniques/. Accessed 7 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Doctorow, Cory. “The SEC Must Not Legitimize Fake ‘Carbon Offsets’.” Marker, 12 Mar. 2022, https://marker.medium.com/the-sec-must-not-legitimize-fake-carbon-offsets-50a685dec5b3. Accessed 7 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DuFord, Rochelle. Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. Stanford University Press, 2022, https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781503630703/html.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Durkheim, Emile. “The Division of Labor in Society.” Social Stratification, edited by David B.Grusky, 4th ed., Routledge, 2014, pp. 217–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Exworthy, Mark. “The NHS and Brexit.” University of Birmingham, w.y., https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/perspective/nhs-and-brexit.aspx.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Faber, Grant, and VolkerSick. Identifying and Mitigating Greenwashing of Carbon Utilization Products. Technical Report, Global CO2 Initiative, 25 Mar. 2022, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/171930.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleischmann, Alexander, et al. “Organizing Solidarity in Difference: Challenges, Achievements, and Emerging Imaginaries.” Organization, vol. 29, no. 2, 2022, pp. 233–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221083907.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Garbe, Sebastian. Weaving Solidarity: Decolonial Perspectives on Transnational Advocacy of and with the Mapuche. Transcript Verlag, 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gelissen, J. “Popular Support for Institutionalised Solidarity: A Comparison between European Welfare States.” International Journal of Social Welfare, vol. 9, no. 4, 2000, pp. 285–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00140.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gordon, Michael. “Constitutional Overload in a Constitutional Democracy: The UK and the Brexit Process.” Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union, edited by SachaGarben et al., Hart Publishing, 2019, pp. 63–89, https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/critical-reflections-on-constitutional-democracy-in-the-european-union-9781509933259/.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Grant, B. J. Tokenism. May 2017, https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/70685.
  27. GroßeKracht, Hermann-Josef. Solidarität und Solidarismus: Postliberale Suchbewegungen zur normativen Selbstverständigung moderner Gesellschaften. Transcript, 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Habermas, Jürgen. “Democracy, Solidarity and the European Crisis.” Roadmap to a Social Europe, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 4–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, Fred. “The Fates of Solidarity: Use and Abuse.” Crime, Social Control and Human Rights, Willan, 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hummel, Patrik, et al. “Sovereignty and Data Sharing.” ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, vol. 2, 2018, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330555591_Sovereignty_and_Data_Sharing.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hunt-Hendrix, Leah, and AstraTaylor. Solidarity: The Past, Present, and Future of a World-Changing Idea. Pantheon Books, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kapeller, Jakob, and FabioWolkenstein. “The Grounds of Solidarity.” European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 16, no. 4, 2013, p. 476.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kashyap, Pranav, and MedhaSingh. “Citron Research Closes GameStop Short Position.” Reuters, 12 June 2024, https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/citron-research-closes-gamestop-short-position-2024-06-12/.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kluttz, Jenalee, et al. “Unsettling Allyship, Unlearning and Learning towards Decolonising Solidarity.” Studies in the Education of Adults, vol. 52, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 49–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2019.1654591.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolers, Avery. “The Priority of Solidarity to Justice.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 31, no. 4, 2014, pp. 420–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12076.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kolers, Avery. “What Does Solidarity Do for Bioethics?” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 47, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 122–28, https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-106040.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuhn, Oliver E. “Liberal Universalism in Crisis: The Nationalist Populist Challenge of Transnational Political Standards.” Transnational Social Review, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 317–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1505590.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Leitner, Sigrid, and StephanLessenich. “Assessing Welfare State Change: The German Social Insurance State between Reciprocity and Solidarity.” Journal of Public Policy, vol. 23, no. 3, Sept. 2003, pp. 325–47, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X03003155.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lubitow, Amy, and MiaDavis. “Pastel Injustice: The Corporate Use of Pinkwashing for Profit.” Environmental Justice, vol. 4, no. 2, June 2011, pp. 139–44, https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2010.0026.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lyócsa, Štefan, et al. “YOLO Trading: Riding with the Herd during the GameStop Episode.” Finance Research Letters, vol. 46, May 2022, p. 102359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102359.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Meulen, R. H. J. ter. Solidarity and Justice in Health and Social Care. Cambridge University Press, 2017, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1560320.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Monarrez, Tomas, and CarinaChien. Dividing Lines: Racially Unequal School Boundaries in US Public School Systems. Research Report, Urban Institute, Sept. 2021, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED616427.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Morton, Timothy. Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. Verso Books, 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mott, Carrie. “The Activist Polis: Topologies of Conflict in Indigenous Solidarity Activism.” Antipode, vol. 48, no. 1, 2016, pp. 193–211, https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12167.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mouffe, Chantal. “Politics, Democratic Action, and Solidarity.” Inquiry, vol. 38, no. 1–2, June 1995, pp. 99–108, https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749508602377.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Nair, Nisha Velappan, and John S.Moolakkattu. “Solidarity Economy and Social Change: Contesting Liberal Universalism.” The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change, edited by RajendraBaikady et al., Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_188-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Nussbaum, Martha C.Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Pearse, Guy. Greenwash: Big Brands and Carbon Scams. Black Inc., 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. PérezEscolar, Marta, et al. “A Systematic Literature Review of the Phenomenon of Disinformation and Misinformation.” Media and Communication, vol. 11, no. 2, Apr. 2023, pp. 76–87, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6453.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Pongiglione, Francesca. “The Epistemic Requirements of Solidarity.” Critical Horizons, vol. 25, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 26–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2024.2313434.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Postone, Moishe. Anti-Semitism and National Socialism. Chronos Publications, 2000, https://mirror.anarhija.net/theanarchistlibrary.org/mirror/m/mp/moishe-postone-anti-semitism-and-national-socialism.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Prainsack, Barbara, and AlenaBuyx. Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139696593.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Rensmann, Lars, and SamuelSalzborn. “Modern Antisemitism as Fetishized Anti-Capitalism: Moishe Postone’s Theory and Its Historical and Contemporary Relevance.” Antisemitism Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 44–99, https://doi.org/10.2979/antistud.5.1.03.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. “Retail Investor.” Cambridge Business English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/retail-investor. Accessed 7 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Rossignol, Nicolas. “Practices of Incident Reporting in a Nuclear Research Center: A Question of Solidarity.” Safety Science, vol. 80, Dec. 2015, pp. 170–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.030.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Rossignol, Nicolas, and MichielvanOudheusden. “Learning from Incidents and Incident Reporting: Safety Governance at a Belgian Nuclear Research Center.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 42, no. 4, July 2017, pp. 679–702, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916686168.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rowlatt, Justin. “Extinction Rebellion Protesters Dragged from Tube Train Roof.” BBC News, 17 Oct. 2019, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-50079716.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Rudschies, Catharina. “Exploring the Concept of Solidarity in the Context of AI: An Ethics in Design Approach.” Digital Society, vol. 2, no. 1, Apr. 2023, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00027-x.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Ryan, John Martin Timothy. “How Brexit Damaged the United Kingdom and the City of London.” The Economists’ Voice, vol. 20, no. 2, Dec. 2023, pp. 179–95, https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0042.
  60. Sánchez-Soriano, Juan-José, and LeonardaGarcía-Jiménez. “La Construcción Mediática Del Colectivo LGTB+ En El Cine Blockbuster de Hollywood. El Uso Del Pinkwashing y El Queerbaiting.” Revista Latina, no. 77, July 2020, pp. 95–116, https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1451.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sangiovanni, Andrea, and JuriViehoff. “Solidarity in Social and Political Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta and UriNodelman, Summer 2023, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/solidarity/.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Scholz, Sally J. Political Solidarity. Penn State University Press, 2008.
  63. “Short Squeeze.” Cambridge Business English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/short-squeeze. Accessed 7 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Spicker, Paul. “Fraternity and Solidarity.” Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, edited by PaulSpicker, Policy Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861348418.003.0006.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Stanton, Maggie. “Paradoxical Feminism: Attempts at Gender Equality in the French Revolution.” Young Historians Conference, Apr. 2020, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2020/papers/3.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Stjernø, Steinar. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge University Press, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490378.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stögner, Karin. “Critical Theory of Racism, Antisemitism, and the Demonisation of Israel: Understanding Their Complex Interrelations.” European Journal of Social Theory, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310251323158.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Umar, Zaghum, et al. “A Tale of Company Fundamentals vs Sentiment Driven Pricing: The Case of GameStop.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, vol. 30, June 2021, p. 100501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100501.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Valenzuela, Sebastián, et al. “The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation.” Digital Journalism, vol. 7, no. 6, July 2019, pp. 802–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Vasileiou, Evangelos. “Does the Short Squeeze Lead to Market Abnormality and Antileverage Effect? Evidence from the Gamestop Case.” Journal of Economic Studies, Dec. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-04-2021-0210.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Vike, Halvard. “The Politics of Solidarity: Explaining Real Universalism.” The Political Economy of Care, Scandinavian University Press, 2024, pp. 43–67, https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215057880-24-02.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wallaschek, Stefan, et al. “Solidarity in the Public Sphere: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Newspapers (2008–2017).” Politics and Governance, vol. 8, no. 2, June 2020, pp. 257–71, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2609.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Weiss, Elias Frederik. Solidarischer Aktienhandel: Gibt es das?2022, https://doi.org/10.25365/THESIS.72598.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Wolff, Sarah, and AgathePiquet. “Post-Brexit Europeanization: Re-Thinking the Continuum of British Policies, Polity, and Politics Trajectories.” Comparative European Politics, vol. 20, no. 5, Oct. 2022, pp. 513–26, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00293-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Yadav, Anil Dutt Misra, and Sushma. Gandhian Alternative (Vol. 3: Socio-Political Thoughts). Concept Publishing Company, 2005.
  76. Zamponi, Lorenzo. “Practices of Solidarity: Direct Social Action, Politicisation and Refugee Solidarity Activism in Italy.” Mondi Migranti, no. 2017/3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3280/MM2017-003005.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/DEMO2025.1.003.WEI
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): democratic societies; methods of theory-building; misappropriated solidarity; parasitical solidarity; political institutions; social theory

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error