2004
Volume 37, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0921-5077
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7235

Abstract

Samenvatting

Voortdurend leren in de praktijk is noodzakelijk voor zorgprofessionals om goede up-to-date zorg te kunnen bieden. Om leren te faciliteren en in te bedden in het reguliere werk worden leernetwerken als veelbelovend beschouwd. Er is echter onvoldoende zicht op hoe specifiek vorm gegeven kan worden aan leernetwerken in zorgpraktijken en hoe zij bijdragen aan het leren persoonsgerichte zorg te verlenen. Deze studie is onderdeel van een ZonMw gesubsidieerd onderzoeksproject ‘LeerSaam Noord’, dat professionalisering van verpleegkundigen en verzorgenden wil versterken en persoonsgerichte zorg wil bevorderen. In dit artikel wordt beschreven hoe leren tijdens leernetwerkbijeenkomsten in vier verschillende zorgcontexten er concreet uitziet en wat daarbij succesfactoren zijn. Daartoe is een thematische analyse gedaan van 11 leernetwerkbijenkomsten in de beginfase van het project, waarin patiëntencasussen centraal stonden om te reflecteren op persoonsgericht handelen van zorgprofessionals. Van belang voor succesvol leren zijn met name veiligheid als gezamenlijke waarde, het leren stellen van verdiepende, reflectie oproepende vragen en het bespreken van ‘schurende’ casuïstiek waarin conflicterende belangen tussen de patiënt en de professional een rol spelen. Opvallend is dat er vooral sprake lijkt van een innerlijk conflict bij de professional zelf, tussen wat men als eigen regie van de patiënt beschouwt en de professionele verantwoordelijkheid.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/GO2024.3.002.CING
2024-09-01
2024-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9073-6
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andriessen, D., & Butter, R. (2016). Doe recht aan diversiteit: Kwaliteitscriteria voor onderzoek in het hbo. Th&MA Hoger Onderwijs, 16(1), 20-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aspin, D. N., & Chapman, J. D. (2000). Lifelong learning: Concepts and conceptions. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293421
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellers, H. (2019). Het leed dat regeldruk heet. Fizier, 36(3), 26-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40739-019-0035-7
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bomhof-Roordink, H., Gärtner, F. R., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Pieterse, A. H. (2019). Key components of shared decision making models: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 9(12), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2019-031763
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brook, C., Pedler, M., & Burgoyne, J. (2012). Some debates and challenges in the literature on action learning: The state of the art since Revans. Human Resource Development International, 15(3), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.687926
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cardiff, S. (2014). Person-centred leadership: A critical participatory action research study exploring and developing a new style of (clinical) nurse leadership [PhD Thesis]. Ulster University. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.625505
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coghlan, D., & Coughlan, P. (2023). Exploring the richness of action learning research to exploit action learning in networks: A journey in shared theorizing. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 30, 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620220000030009
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Den Hollander, D., & Wilken, J. (2020). Werken in verbinding: Praktijkboek steunend relationeel handelen. SWP Uitgeverij. https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:hbokennisbank.nl:sharekit_hu%3Aoai%3Asurfsharekit.nl%3A52d0d870-7437-4c25-a896-51d9f921cd19
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dikken, J., Bakker, A., Hoogerduijn, J., & Schuurmans, M. (2016). Verpleegkundige, blijf leren!TVZ – Tijdschrift Voor Verpleegkundige Experts, 126(6), 44-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41184-016-0144-X
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Edmondson, A. C., & Bohmer, R. M. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685-716. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094828
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., & Nummijoki, J. (2015). Double stimulation in everyday work: Critical encounters between home care workers and their elderly clients. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.005
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2020). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: Four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701425706
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabbay, J., & Le May, A. (2016). Mindlines: Making sense of evidence in practice. British Journal of General Practice, 66(649), 402-403. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X686221
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamel, M. (2019). Hobbelige weg naar twee functies. Nursing, 25(2), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41193-019-0030-3
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Heemskerk, W., Dauphin, S., Van Dorst, M. A., Bussemaker, M., & Wallner, C. (2021). A learning community within nursing practice: The value created by the activities and interactions during the early stage of community development. Nurse Education in Practice, 57, 103242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103242
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heerkens, Y., De Weerd, M., Huber, M., De Brouwer, C., Van der Veen, S., Perenboom, R., Van Gool, C., Ten Napel, H., Van Bon-Martens, M., Stallinga, H., & Van Meeteren, N. (2017). Focus op functioneren. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 95(3), 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0039-4
    [Google Scholar]
  21. King, R., Taylor, B., Talpur, A., Jackson, C., Manley, K., Ashby, N., Tod, A., Ryan, T., Wood, E., Senek, M., & Robertson, S. (2020). Factors that optimise the impact of continuing professional development in nursing: A rapid evidence review. Nurse Education Today, 98, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104652
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Laal, M. (2011). Lifelong learning: What does it mean?Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 470-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.11.090
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lambrechts, F., Martens, H., & Poisquet, J. (2007). Generatief leren tussen en in organisaties. Develop, 3(2), 20-36. https://www.itineris-advies.be/editor/files/2018/03/artikel_kennisdeling_Development.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lambrechts, F., Taillieu, T., Grieten, S., & Poisquet, J. (2012). In-depth joint supply chain learning: Towards a framework. Supply Chain Management, 17(6), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211269238
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lim, I. (2019). A review of cultural-historical activity theory’s contribution to interprofessional learning and practice in healthcare: A meta-ethnography. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 332-347. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656118303040
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Machin, A. I., & Pearson, P. (2014). Action learning sets in a nursing and midwifery practice learning context: A realistic evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(4), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.01.007
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJTD.12044
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mazereeuw, M., Khaled, A., & Van Duuren, A. (2021). De ontwikkeling van wendbaar vakmanschap van mbo-studenten. SIA-RAAK Onderzoeksrapport. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355041884_De_ontwikkeling_van_wendbaar_vakmanschap_van_mbo-studenten
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McCormack, B., Manley, K., & Titchen, A. (2013). Practice development in nursing and healthcare. Wiley Blackwell. https://books.google.nl/books?hl=en&lr=&id=MUqG9VHyQfIC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1991&dq=mccormack+practice+development&ots=AT2182izeM&sig=xFs3q4eOncB9LYyidvTDU34G6vo
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Morgan, S., & Yoder, L. H. (2012). A concept analysis of person-centered care. Journal of Holistic Nursing: Official Journal of the American Holistic Nurses’ Association, 30(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010111412189
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Munten, G., Legius, M., Niessen, T., Snoeren, M., Jukema, J., & Harps-Timmerman, A. (2012). Practice development: Naar duurzame verandering van zorg- en onderwijspraktijken. Boom Lemma. https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:hbokennisbank.nl:sharekit_fontys%3Aoai%3Asurfsharekit.nl%3Ab93dd5bf-10a2-45f9-bb66-5e3f8e5d337a
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nevalainen, M., Lunkka, N., & Suhonen, M. (2018). Work-based learning in health care organisations experienced by nursing staff: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 29, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.004
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HRMR.2017.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nordquist, J., Hall, J., Caverzagie, K., Snell, L., Chan, M. K., Thoma, B., Razack, S., & Philibert, I. (2019). The clinical learning environment. Medical Teacher, 41(4), 366-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1566601
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Donovan, R., & Mcauliffe, E. (2020). A systematic review of factors that enable psychological safety in healthcare teams. International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 2020(4), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa025
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Oshodi, T. O., Bruneau, B., Crockett, R., Kinchington, F., Nayar, S., & West, E. (2019). Registered nurses’ perceptions and experiences of autonomy: A descriptive phenomenological study. BMC Nursing, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12912-019-0378-3/TABLES/4
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Phelan, A., McCormack, B., Dewing, J., Brown, D., Cardiff, S., Cook, N., Dickson, C., Kmete, S., Lorber, M., Magowan, R., McCance, T., Skovdahl, K., Štiglic, G., & Van Lieshout, F. (2020). Review of developments in person-centred healthcare. International Practice Development Journal, 10(Suppl2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.10suppl2.003
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Purohit, H. S., Pisulkar, S. K., Godbole, S. D., Kambala, S. S., & Pisulkar, G. L. (2020). Near-peer – A learning modality. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 9(46), 3479-3483. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&issn=22784748&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA643689439&sid=googleScholar&linkaccess=fulltext
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Qanbari Qalehsari, M., Khaghanizadeh, M., & Ebadi, A. (2017). Lifelong learning strategies in nursing: A systematic review. Electronic Physician, 9(10), 5541-5550. https://doi.org/10.19082/5541
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J. J., Cunningham, F. C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2011). How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 273.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Read, M., Peters, S., Bennett, N., Francis, J. J., Fetherstonhaugh, D., Lim, W. K., & Tropea, J. (2023). Communities of practice in residential aged care: A rapid review. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 18(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12563
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, G. I. (2015). Communities of practice: Exploring enablers and barriers with school health clinicians. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(5), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417415576776
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Seibert, S. (2015). The meaning of a healthcare community of practice. Nursing Forum, 50(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12065
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Snoeren, M. M., Niessen, T. J., & Abma, T. A. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Towards a more encompassing view of learning. Management Learning, 46(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507613504344
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stuijvenberg, R. (2010). Leren en veranderen, een relatie tussen individueel leren, teamkenmerken en teamleren bij verpleegkundigen in de klinische setting [Thesis]. Universiteit Utrecht. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/178805
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Swennenhuis, P., Moresi, S., Duinkerke, M., Bovens, J., Quadakkers, D., & Snoeren, M. (2021). Lerend en onderzoekend samenwerken in professionele werkplaatsen: De ontwikkeling van een theoretisch model. Pedagogische Studiën, 98(2), 112-131. http://onderwijsdatabank.s3.amazonaws.com/downloads/98-2-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Smaling, A. (2008). Dialoog en empathie in de methodologie. HUP/SWP.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ten Hoeve, Y., Brouwer, J., & Kunnen, S. (2020). Turnover prevention: The direct and indirect association between organizational job stressors, negative emotions and professional commitment in novice nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(3), 836-845. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14281
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tosey, P. (2006). Bateson’s levels of learning: A framework for transformative learning?https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/conferencePresentation/Batesons-Levels-Of-Learning-a-Framework-For-Transformative-Learning/99516257702346
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tosey, P., Visser, M., & Saunders, M. N. (2012). The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review. Management Learning, 43(3), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611426239
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Van den Boogaard, T. C., Roodbol, P. F., Poslawsky, I. E., & Ten Hoeve, Y. (2019). The orientation and attitudes of intermediate vocational trained nursing students (MBO-V) towards their future profession: A pre-post survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 37(5), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.007
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Van der Cingel, C. J. M. (2019). Notes on nursing 2.0. Verpleegkunde, 34(3), 35-38. https://tijdschriftverpleegkunde-1nl-100001fn137e3.hanserver03.nhl.nl/jaargangen/2019/3-sep/notes-on-nursing-2-0.html#read-article
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van der Cingel, C. J. M., & Brouwer, J. (2021). What makes a nurse today? A debate on the nursing professional identity and its need for change. Nursing Philosophy, 22(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12343
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Dongen, J. J. J., Van Bokhoven, M. A., Goossens, W. N. M., Daniëls, R., Van der Weijden, T., & Beurskens, A. (2018). Suitability of a programme for improving interprofessional primary care team meetings. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(4), 12, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4179
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Lieshout, F., & Cardiff, S. (2015). Reflections on being and becoming a personcentred facilitator. International Journal of Practice Development, 5(4), 1-10. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c5c3/58bc137d0abe964689787bb89f998c844ac7.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Lieshout, F., Jacobs, G. C., & Cardiff, S. (2017). Actieonderzoek: Principes voor verandering in zorg en welzijn. Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Van Vliet, K., Chorus, A., & Ruwaard, D. (2017). Anders kijken, anders leren, anders doen. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 95(2), 53-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0024-y
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Verbeek, F. H. O., Van Lierop, M. E. A., Meijers, J. M. M., Van Rossum, E., Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Laurant, M. G. H., & Van Vught, A. J. A. H. (2023). Facilitators for developing an interprofessional learning culture in nursing homes: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-023-09092-5
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Waal, G. H., Van Dulmen, S., Verkerk, E., Knol, T., & Vermeulen, H. (2017). Verpleegkundige basiszorg Maak je eigen korte beter laten-lijst. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice, 15(3), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12468-017-0025-5
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wendt, B., Van Dulmen, S., Vermeulen, H., & Huisman-De Waal, G. (2022). Ambitieuze nieuwe norm. TVZ – Verpleegkunde in Praktijk en Wetenschap, 132(6), 14-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41184-022-1768-7
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice. https://www.wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, C. H. Y., Halapy, H., Kaplan, D., Brydges, R., Hall, S., & Wong, R. (2016). Effects of a longitudinal interprofessional educational outreach program on collaboration. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 36(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000020
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zuidersma, J. (2012). Wederkerigheidspatronen in regionale samenwerkingsverbanden: Een gedragstheoretische benadering [PhD thesis]. Universiteit Groningen. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/342152165
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/GO2024.3.002.CING
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/GO2024.3.002.CING
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error