2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2666-5050

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the politics of victimhood in the Srebrenica Memorial Centre’s permanent exhibition, , a joint venture with the Dutch organisations PAX and Memorial Centre Camp Westerbork. Departing from the exhibition’s curation process and its sociopolitical dimensions, this article questions how the exhibition’s textual and visual narratives are shaped by social and political discourses of victimhood, perpetratorship and implication. This article demonstrates how the exhibition draws on dominant narrative templates and tropes derived from the ‘memory imperative.’ This template shapes representations of Bosniak victimhood along gendered binaries, while keeping perpetratorship at a distance through discursive and visual means. The exhibition’s focus on international, and specifically Dutch, actors constructs a narrative of progress and redemption focused on Dutch atonement. By highlighting the memory imperative’s narrative shaping of the exhibition, this article contributes to discussions on power imbalances in transnational memory work, demonstrating how the use of global memorial forms may eclipse local complexities of violence and survivor agency in favour of international atonement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/HMC2026.1.007.UITT
2026-03-01
2026-03-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/26665050/1/1/HMC2026.1.007.UITT.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/HMC2026.1.007.UITT&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Algra, Gielt, MartinElands, and Jan RenéSchoeman. 2007. “The Media and the Public Image of Dutch Veterans from World War II to Srebrenica.”Armed Forces and Society33 (3): 396–413.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Kjell. 2020. “The Perpetrator Imaginary: Representing Perpetrators of Genocide.” In Researching Perpetrators of Genocide, edited by KjellAnderson and ErinJessee, 23–48. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashplant, T.G., GrahamDawson, and MichaelRoper. 2000. The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Azoulay, Ariella. 2008. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barton Hronešová, Jessie. 2022. “Ethnopopulist Denial and Crime Relativisation in Bosnian Republika Srpska.”East European Politics38 (1): 21–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bećirević, Edina. 2014. Genocide on the Drina River. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berg, Dion Van Den, and MartinHoondert. 2020. “The Srebrenica Exhibition.”Oñati Socio-Legal Series10 (3): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blustein, Jeffrey. 2012. “Human Rights and the Internationalization of Memory.”Journal of Social Philosophy43 (1): 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, Christian. 2014. “The Srebrenica-Potočari Memorial: Promoting (In)Justice?” In Memorials in Times of Transition, edited by SusanneBuckley-Zistel and StefanieSchäfer, 173–98. Cambridge: Intersentia.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bull, Anna Cento, and Hans LaugeHansen. 2016. “On Agonistic Memory.”Memory Studies9 (4): 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015615935.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. David, Lea. 2019. “Policing Memory in Bosnia: Ontological Security and International Administration of Memorialization Policies.”International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society32 (2): 211-225.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Driessen, Siri, Jeannettevan Brenk, Nicole L.Immler, and EricVermetten. 2025. “‘Unburden Us and Them’: Encountering ‘the Other’ in Meetings between Bosnian Genocide Survivors and Dutch UN Veterans.”Frontiers in Sociology10 (March).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duijzings, Ger. 2007. “Commemorating Srebrenica: Histories of Violence and the Politics of Memory in Eastern Bosnia.” In The New Bosnian Mosaic, edited by XavierBougarel, GerDuijzings, and ElissaHelms, 1st ed., 141–66. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edkins, Jenny. 2003. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fassin, Didier, and RichardRechtman. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Golubović, Jelena. 2019. “‘One Day I Will Tell This to My Daughter’: Serb Women, Silence, and the Politics of Victimhood in Sarajevo.”Anthropological Quarterly92 (4): 1173–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Graefenstein, Sulamith. 2020. “The Memory Imperative as a Narrative Template: Difficult Heritage at European and North American Human Rights Museums.”International Journal of Heritage Studies26 (8): 768–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halilovich, Hariz. 2013. Places of Pain: Forced Displacement, Popular Memory and Trans-Local Identities in Bosnian War-Torn Communities. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Helms, Elissa. 2012. “‘Bosnian Girl’: Nationalism and Innocence through Images of Women.” In Retracing Images: Visual Culture after Yugoslavia, edited by D.Suber and S.Karamanic, 195–222. London: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Helms, Elissa. 2013. Innocence and Victimhood: Gender, Nation, and Women’s Activism in Postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Herik, Larissa Van Den. 2015. “Accountability Through Fact-Finding: Appraising Inquiry in the Context of Srebrenica.”Netherlands International Law Review62 (2): 295–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2002. “Jaarverslag 2002.”Hooghalen.
  24. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2012. “29, 478, Regionale Benadering Westelijke Balkan. Nr 10: Brief van de Ministers van Buitenlandse Zaken En van Defensie, 20 Maart 2012.”Hooghalen: Archive Camp Westerbork Memorial Center.
  25. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2014a. “Jaarverslag 2014.”Hooghalen.
  26. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2014b. “Onderbouwing: 2014-07-24.”Hooghalen: Archive Camp Westerbork Memorial Center.
  27. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2014c. “Opzet Expo; 2014-07-17.”Hooghalen: Archive Camp Westerbork Memorial Center.
  28. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2015. “Jaarverslag 2015.”Hooghalen.
  29. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2016. “Hobbels En Problemen; 2016-06-08.”Hooghalen: Archive Camp Westerbork Memorial Center.
  30. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. 2017. “Jaarverslag 2017.”Hooghalen.
  31. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork. n.d. “Notitie Nederlandse Bijdrage Tot de Tweede Fase van Het Potocari Memorial Centre.”Hooghalen: Archive Camp Westerbork Memorial Center.
  32. Jacobs, Janet. 2010. Memorializing the Holocaust: Gender, Genocide and Collective Memory. New York: I.B. Tauris & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacobs, Janet. 2017. “The Memorial at Srebrenica: Gender and the Social Meanings of Collective Memory in Bosnia-Herzegovina.”Memory Studies10 (4): 423–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Karčić, Hikmet. 2022. Torture, Humiliate, Kill: Inside the Bosnian Serb Camp System. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Keulemans, Chris. 2020. Srebrenica & PAX 1995-2020: Een Geschiedenis van 25 Jaar Solidariteit. Utrecht: Vredesorganisatie PAX.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Levy, Daniel, and NatanSznaider. 2010. Human Rights and Memory. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lischer, Sarah Kenyon. 2019. “Narrating Atrocity: Genocide Memorials, Dark Tourism, and the Politics of Memory.”Review of International Studies45 (5): 805–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000226.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mannergren, Johanna, AnnikaBjörkdahl, SusanneBuckley-Zistel, StefanieKappler, and TimothyWilliams. 2024. Peace and the Politics of Memory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mannergren Selimovic, Johanna. 2020. “Gender, Narrative and Affect: Top-down Politics of Commemoration in Post-Genocide Rwanda.”Memory Studies13 (2): 131–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mastenbroek, Kay. 2017. De Strijd Om Het Srebrenica Museum. Electrical Films.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mehler, Daniela. 2017. “The Last ‘Never Again’? Srebrenica and the Making of a Memory Imperative.”European Review of History24 (4): 606–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mulaj, Klejda. 2017. “Genocide and the Ending of War: Meaning, Remembrance and Denial in Srebrenica, Bosnia.”Crime, Law and Social Change68 (1–2): 123–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mulaj, Klejda. 2021. “Constructions of Genocide Denial and Remembrance: Fractured National Identity in Postgenocide Bosnia.” In Postgenocide: Interdisciplinary Reflections on the Effects of Genocide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mustafić, Alma, and NikéWentholt. 2024. “Finding the Truth but Ending the Conversation? How Dutch Civil Court Cases on the Srebrenica Genocide Shaped the Space for Reparation.” In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 53:321–52. T.M.C. Asser Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pollack, Craig Evan. 2003a. “Burial at Srebrenica: Linking Place and Trauma.”Social Science and Medicine56 (4): 793–801.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pollack, Craig Evan. 2003b. “Intentions of Burial: Mourning, Politics, and Memorials Following the Massacre at Srebrenica.”Death Studies27 (2): 125–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Radonić, Ljiljana. 2023. “Displaying Violence in Memorial Museums – Reflections on the Use of Photographs.”Österreichische Zeitschrift Fur Geschichtswissenschaften34 (1): 59–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rauschenbach, Mina. 2022. “International Memory Entrepreneurs’ Prescriptions for the Remembrance of the Srebrenica Genocide.” In Localising Memory in Transitional Justice, 21–49. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rijsdijk, Erna. 2012. Lost in Srebrenica: Responsibility and Subjectivity in the Reconstructions of a Failed Peacekeeping Mission. Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ronsbo, Henrik, and SteffenJensen. 2014. “Introduction: Histories of Victimhood: Assemblages, Transactions, and Figures.” In Histories of Victimhood, 1–22. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rothberg, Michael. 2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Silber, Laura, and AllanLittle. 1997. Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Simić, Olivera. 2009. “What Remains of Srebrenica? Motherhood, Transitional Justice and Yearning for the Truth.”Journal of International Women’s Studies10 (4): 220–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sodaro, Amy. 2020. “Selective Memory: Memorial Museums, Human Rights, and the Politics of Victimhood.” In Museums and Sites of Persuasion, edited by JoyceApsel and AmySodaro, 1st ed., 19–35. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sontag, Susan. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Spahić Šiljak, Zilka. 2020. “Victim or Survivor? Choosing Identity after Wartime Sexual Violence.” In Healing and Peacebuilding After War: Transforming Trauma in Bosnia and Herzegovina, edited by JulianneFunk, NancyGood, and Marie E.Berry, 121–32. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Todorova, Maria. 2009. Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wertsch, James V.2008. “The Narrative Organization of Collective Memory.”Ethos36 (1): 120–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, Paul. 2007. Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities. New York: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Žarkov, Dubravka. 2008. The Body of War: Media, Ethnicity, and Gender in the Break-up of Yugoslavia. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/HMC2026.1.007.UITT
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/HMC2026.1.007.UITT
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error