2004
Volume 73, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0165-2346
  • E-ISSN: 2773-1847

Abstract

Abstract

In this article the story of the raising of Lazarus is object of study. I approach this story from Genre- und Formkritik. I begin with the delimitation, context and structure of this passage. Afterwards I treat John 10:40-11:54 as a miracle story, discuss the question to which genre it belongs and examine the different motifs, with special attention to the motif of the late coming of the miracle worker, clearing the way for discussion about life and death as the definitive end, and the motif of belief, not a condition, but goal for the miracle.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.2.007.RIEM
2022-06-01
2022-08-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bastiaens, J. (2018). De Messias tussen dood en leven: De belijdenis van Marta en Maria in woord en daad (Joh 11:1-12:19). Ezra49 (2), 33-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodie, T.L. (1993). The Gospel According to John: A Literary and Theological Com-mentary. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke, A.J. (2003). The Raising of Lazarus and the Passion of Jesus in John 11 and 12: A Study of John’s Literary Structure and His Narrative Theology (Studies in the Bible & Early Christianity, 59). Edwin Mellen Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, B. (1991). Lazarus: A Contemporary Reading of John 11:1-46 (ZS:NT). The Liturgical Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Esler, P., Piper, R.A. (2006). Lazarus, Mary and Martha: A Social-Scientific and Theological Reading of John. Fortress Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischbach, S.M. (1992). Totenerweckungen: Zur Geschichte einer Gattung (FzB, 69). Echter Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hakola, R. (1999). A Character Resurrected: Lazarus in the Fourth Gospel and Afterwards. In D.Rhoads (ed.), Characterization in the Gospels: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism (JSNT.SS, 184) (pp. 223-263). Sheffield Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hofius, O. (2005). Die Auferweckung des Lazarus. Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche102, 17-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kampen, L. van (2016). Jezus volgens Johannes: Meelezen met de evangelist. Royal Jongbloed.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Knoch, O. (1993). Dem, der glaubt, ist alles möglich: Die Botschaft der Wundererzä-hlungen der Evangelien. Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Labahn, M. (1999). Jesus als Lebensspender: Untersuchungen zu einer Geschichte der johanneischen Tradition anhand ihrer Wundergeschichten (BZNW, 98). Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Maas, J. (z.j.). De structuur van de geloofscommunicatie in Johannes 11,1-46. In P.Beentjes et al. (red.), ‘Gelukkig de mens’: Opstellen over psalmen, exegese en semiotiek aangeboden aan Nico Tromp (pp. 169-181). Kok.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meier, J.P. (1994). A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Volume II: Mentor, Message, and Miracles (ABRL). Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Michiels, R. (1975). De opwekking van Lazarus. Collationes5, 433-447.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moloney, F. (1994). The Faith of Martha and Mary: A Narrative Approach to John 11,17-40. Biblica75, 471-493.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Moloney, F. (2003). Can Everyone be Wrong? A Reading of John 11.1-12.8. New Testament Studies45, 505-527.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pichon, C. (2007). Les revivifications en Luc-Actes: Enjeux théologiques et herméneuti-ques de quatre réécritures (Lc 7,11-17; 8,40-56; Act 9,36-43; 20,7-12). Diffusion Theses.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Riemersma, N.A. (2016). Aan de dode een wonder gedaan: Een exegetisch-herme-neutische studie naar de dodenopwekking in Lucas 7,11-17 in relatie tot 1 Koningen 17,17-24 en Vita Apollonii IV,45 (ACEBT.SS, 14). 2VM.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Riet, P. van ’t (1996). Het evangelie uit het leerhuis van Lazarus: Een speurtocht naar de joodse herkomst van het vierde evangelie. Ten Have.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneiders, S.M. (1987). Death in the Community of Eternal Life: History, Theology and Spirituality in John 11. Interpretation41, 44-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Servotte, H. (1995). De opwekking van Lazarus (Johannes 11,1-44). In G.van Belle (red.), Het Johannesevangelie: Woorden om van te leven (pp. 145-155). VBS-Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Smit, J. (2015). Het verhaal van Johannes: Sleutelfiguren uit zijn evangelie. Berne Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sproston North, W.E. (2001). The Lazarus Story within the Johannine Tradition (JSNT. SS, 212). Sheffield Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stibbe, M.W.G. (1994). A Tomb with a View: John 11,1-44 in Narrative-Critical Perspective. New Testament Studies, 40, 38-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Theiβen, G. (19987). Urchristliche Wundergeschichten: Ein Beitrag zur formge-schichtlichen Erforschung der synoptischen Evangelien. Chr. Kaiser Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tilborg, S. van (1975). Jezus en Lazarus. Ons Geestelijk Leven52, 93-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tilborg, S. van (1993). Imaginative Love in John (BIS, 2). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Welck, C. (1994). Erzählte Zeichen: Die Wundergeschichten des Johannesevangeliums literarisch untersucht (WUNT, II/60). Mohr-Siebeck.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Weren, W.J.C. (2014). Death and Beyond in the Fourth Gospel: Conflicting Views in the Lazarus Story (John 11,1-53). In J.Verheyden et al. (ed.), Studies in the Gospel of John and its Christology. Fs. Gilbertvan Belle (BETL, 265) (pp. 257-274). Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeilinger, F. (2011). Die sieben Zeichenhandlungen Jesu im Johannesevangelium. Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zimmermann, R. (2008). The Narrative Hermeneutics of John 11: Learning with Lazarus How to Understand Death, Life, and Resurrection. In C.R.Koester & R.Bieringer (ed.), The Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospel of John (WUNT, 222) (pp. 75-101). Siebeck-Mohr.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.2.007.RIEM
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error