Full text loading...
Ecofeminist theology appears to be in opposition to the theology of K. H. Miskotte. Miskotte opposed natural theology and approached creation from a soteriological standpoint. In his footsteps, nature and creation became suspicious categories in theology. However, Miskotte is also known for his love of nature, especially the woods, as testified in his published diaries. Might Miskotte’s love of nature and his thinking on creation contribute constructively to ecofeminist thinking? In this article, the idea is contested that Miskotte’s love for nature was just a juvenile, romantic phase, and two starting points are proposed on how Miskotte’s thinking could contribute to ecofeminist theology.