Vergilius is dood, lang leve zijn Appendix! | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 55 Number 4
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

The is a heterogeneous collection of pseudo-Vergilian poems, consisting in part of primary , i.e. poems that self-consciously create the illusion of Vergilian authorship (especially and ). For centuries, scholarship on these poems has been dominated by the question of authenticity. In the wake of New Criticism, Barthes’ ‘The Death of the Author’ (1967) and Foucault’s ‘What is an Author?’ (1969), however, classical scholars have grown to understand and appreciate how these poems – regardless of who actually wrote them – produce their ‘Vergil’, supplementing the master poet’s oeuvre, inserting themselves in his poetic biography, and casting him in the role of

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2022.4.004.SOER
2022-11-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bickel, E.1950. ‘Syllabus indiciorum quibus pseudovergiliana et pseudoovidiana carmina definiantur. Symbolae ad Cirin, Culicem, Aetnan’, Rheinisches Museum93, 289-324.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Birt, Th.1910. Jugendverse und Heimatpoesie Vergils, Leipzig/Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brugnoli, G. en F.Stok. 1997. Vitae vergilianae antiquae, Rome.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, S. (ed.). 1995. Authorship. From Plato to the postmodern. A reader, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank, T.1922. Vergil. A biography, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldschmidt, N.2019. The Afterlives of Roman Poets. Biofiction and the reception of Latin poetry, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodyear, F.R.D.1965. Incerti auctoris Aetna, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Holzberg, N. (ed.). 2005. Die Appendix Vergiliana. Pseudipigraphen im literarischen Kontext, Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Horsfall, N.1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Housman, A.E.1902. ‘Remarks on the Culex’, Classical Review16-17, 339-346.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunink, V.2020. Martialis. Feest in het Oude Rome. Geschenken voor de Saturnaliën [Epigrammen boek 13 en 14: Xenia en Apophoreta], Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunter, R.2002. ‘The Sense of an Author. Theocritus and [Theocritus]’ in R.K.Gibson en C.S.Kraus (eds), The Classical Commentary. Histories, practices, theory, Leiden, 89-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindsay, W.M.1903. M. Val. Martialis Epigrammata, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Peirano, I.2012. The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake. Latin pseudepigrapha in context, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rand, E.K.1919. ‘Young Virgil’s Poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology30, 103-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Reeve, M.D.1976. ‘The Textual Tradition of the Appendix Vergiliana’, Maia28, 233-254.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Richter, W.1963. Aetna. Texte und Kommentare, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rolfe, J.C.1914. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, Volume II: Claudius. Nero. Galba, Otho, and Vitellius. Vespasian. Titus, Domitian. Lives of Illustrious Men: Grammarians and Rhetoricians. Poets (Terence. Virgil. Horace. Tibullus. Persius. Lucan). Lives of Pliny the Elder and Passienus Crispus, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Scaliger, J.1573. P. Virgilii Maronis Appendix, Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schrijvers, P.2004. Vergilius, Georgica, landleven, Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schrijvers, P.2018. Vergilius, Bucolica, buitenleven, Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Seelentag, S.2012. Der pseudovergilische Culex. Text – Übersetzung – Kommentar, Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Shackleton Bailey, D.R.2003. Statius, Silvae, Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stok, F.2010. ‘The Life of Vergil before Donatus’, in J.Farrell en M.C.J.Putnam (eds), A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition, Chichester, 107-120.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Thilo, G. en H.Hagen. 1881-1902. Servii Grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii carmina commentarii (drie delen), Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilamowitz, U. von. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos2, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Zogg, F.2016. ‘Die Appendix Vergiliana avant la lettre. Martial, Donat, Servius und der Murbach-Katalog zu Vergils angeblichen Jugendwerken’, Antike und Abendland62, 74-85.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2022.4.004.SOER
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error