De revisionistische muze

References

1. Cavarero, A.1995. In Spite of Plato. A feminist re-writing of ancient philosophy, with a foreword by Rosi Braidotti, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cox, F.2011. Sibylline Sisters. Virgil’s presence in contemporary women’s writing, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cox, F.2018. Strange Monsters. Ovid’s presence in contemporary women’s writing, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Doherty, L.2001. Gender and the Interpretation of Classical Myth, Londen.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Genette, G.1982. Palimpsests. Literature in the second degree, Lincoln.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gilbert, S. en S.Gubar. 1979. The Madwoman in the Attic. The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination, New Haven.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gill, A.1999. ‘Little Lo Lost in a Literary Feud’, evergreenreview.com/read/littlelo-lost-in-a-literary-feud/ (oorspronkelijk gepubliceerd in the Toronto Globe en The Evergreen Review 103) (geraadpleegd op 02/06/2023).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Goff, B.2022. ‘Do we have a new song yet? The new wave of women’s novels and the homeric tradition’, Humanities11.2, 49, doi.org/10.3390/h11020049
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hay, M.2023. ‘BookTok’, London Review of Books19.02.2023, www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n02/malin-hay/booktok.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Plate, L.2008. ‘Rewriting. Literatuur als parallel script’, Vooys. Tijdschrift voor letteren26.3, 63-73.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Plate, L.2011. Remembering the Past, Manufacturing Memories. Contemporary women’s re-writing and/as cultural memory, Basingstoke/New York.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Theodorakopoulos, E. en F.Cox (eds). 2012. Female Transgressions. Classical reception and contemporary women writers, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Theodorakopoulos, E. en F.Cox (eds). 2016. Homer’s Daughters. Women’s responses to Homer, 1914-2014, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Theodorakopoulos, E. en F.Cox (eds). 2019. Homer’s Daughters. Women’s responses to Homer in the twentieth century and beyond, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]