Pragmatische partikels in Plato

References

1. Allan, R.J.2014. ‘Changing the topic. Topic position in Ancient Greek word order’, Mnemosyne67, 181-213.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, R.J.2017. ‘Ancient Greek adversative particles in contrast’, in C.Denizot en O.Spevak (eds), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, Amsterdam, 273-302.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allan, R.J.2021. ‘Pointing to common ground in dramatic dialogue. The case of δή and τοι’, in G.Martin, F.Iurescia, S.Hof en G.Sorrentino (eds), Pragmatic approaches to drama. Studies in communication on the ancient stage, Leiden, 43-69.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakker, E.J.1993. ‘Boundaries, topics, and the structure of discourse. An investigation of the Ancient Greek particle dé’, Studies in Language17, 275-311.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bonifazi, A., A.Drummen en M.de Kreij. 2021. Particles in Ancient Greek discourse, Cambridge, MA.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burnet, J.1900-1907. Platonis opera (vijf delen), Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Caspers, C.L.2010. ‘The pragmatic function and textual status of Euripidean οὔ που and ἦ που’, Classical Quarterly60, 327-344.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Denniston, J.D.1934. The Greek particles, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Emde Boas, E. van, A.Rijksbaron, L.Huitink en M.de Bakker. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of Classical Greek, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goldstein, D.2019. ‘Discourse particles in LSJ: A fresh look at γε’, in C.Stray, M.Clarke en J.T.Katz (eds), Liddell and Scott. The history, methodology, and languages of the world’s leading lexicon of Ancient Greek (online editie, Oxford Academic, 21november2019), Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Koier, E.2013. Interpreting particles in dead and living languages. A construction grammar approach to the semantics of Dutch ergens and Ancient Greek pou, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kroon, C.H.M. en I.Sluiter. 2010. Het geheim van de blauwe broer. Eindrapport van de verkenningscommissie klassieke talen, Leiden/Enschede.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Rijksbaron, A. (ed.). 1997. New approaches to Greek particles, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rooy, R. van.2016. ‘The relevance of evidentiality for Ancient Greek. Some explorative steps through Plato’, Journal of Greek Linguistics16, 3-46.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sicking, C.M.J.1971. ‘Over doelstellingen’, Lampas4, 2-25.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sicking, C.M.J.1986. ‘Griekse partikels. Definitie en classificatie’, Lampas19, 125-141.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sicking, C.M.J.1997. ‘Particles in questions in Plato’, in A.Rijksbaron (ed.), 157-174.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Sicking, C.M.J. en J.M.van Ophuijsen. 1993. Two studies in Attic particle usage. Lysias and Plato, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Slings, S.R.1997. ‘Adversative relators between PUSH and POP’, in A.Rijksbaron (ed.), 101-129.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Thijs, K.2021. Polysemous particles in Ancient Greek. A study with special reference to μήν and δή, Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wakker, G.C.1994. Conditions and conditionals. An investigation of Ancient Greek, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Wakker, G.C.2009. ‘“Well I will now present my arguments”. Discourse cohesion marked by oun and toinun in Lysias’, in S.J.Bakker en G.C.Wakker (eds), Discourse cohesion in Ancient Greek, Leiden, 63-81.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Zakowski, S.2014. ‘Inference and metarepresentation. Ancient Greek ἦ που as a constraint on higher-level explicatures’, Journal of Pragmatics74, 109-128.
    [Google Scholar]