Van smeken naar ‘alsjeblieft’ in het Oudgrieks

References

1. Allan, R.J.2017. ‘The grammaticalization of Greek particles. A functional discourse grammar approach’, in F.Logozzo en P.Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek linguistics. New approaches, insights, perspectives, Berlijn/Boston, 103-118.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, R.J. en R.Risselada. 2017. ‘The language of literature in Lampas. Een halve eeuw Griekse en Latijnse taalkunde’, Lampas50.3, 271-291.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, J.L.1962. How to do things with words, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beek, L. van (ed.). 2025. Language change in epic Greek and other poetic traditions, Leiden/Boston.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beekes, R.S.P.2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek, Leiden.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J.L.2015. Language change, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chantraine, P.1968. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots, Parijs.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clackson, J.2015. Language and society in the Greek and Roman worlds, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dover, K.J.1993. Frogs, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Emde Boas, E. van.2017. ‘Analyzing Agamemnon. Conversation analysis and particles in Greek tragic dialogue’, Classical Philology112.4, 411-434.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Emde Boas, E. van, A.Rijksbaron, L.Huitink en M.de Bakker. 2020. ‘Een nieuwe grammatica van het klassiek Grieks’, Lampas53.1, 84-95.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fedriani, C.2019. ‘The embodied basis of discourse and pragmatic markers in Greek and Latin’, in E.Mocciaro en W.M.Short (eds.), 69-92.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frisk, H.1973. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garvie, A.F.2003. Odyssey, Cambridge/New York.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Giannakis, G.K., P.Filos, E.Crespo en J.de la Villa (eds.). 2023. Classical philology and linguistics. Old themes and new perspectives, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hackstein, O.2010. ‘The Greek of epic’, in E.J.Bakker (ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language, Oxford, 401-423.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Holton, D., G.C.Horrocks, M.Janssen, T.Lendari, I.Manolessou en N.Toufexis. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of medieval and early modern Greek, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jucker, A.H.2008. ‘Historical pragmatics’, Language and Linguistics Compass2.5, 894-906.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Labov, W.1994. Principles of linguistic change. 1: Internal factors, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Létoublon, F.1980. ‘Le vocabulaire de la supplication en grec. Performatif et derivation delocutive. Hikétés et hikànõ, lité et lissomai’, Lingua52.3, 325-336.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mocciaro, E. en W.M.Short (eds.). 2019. Toward a cognitive classical linguistics. The embodied basis of constructions in Greek and Latin, Berlijn/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Narrog, H. en B.Heine. 2021. Grammaticalization, Oxford/New York.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pinkster, H.2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. Volume I: The simple clause, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pinkster, H.2021. The Oxford Latin syntax. Volume II: The complex sentence and discourse, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Roi, E. la (ed.). 2020a. Themanummer ‘Lingua Graeca als lingua franca! De Griekse taal door de eeuwen heen’, Tetradio29.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Roi, E. la.2020b. ‘The development of εὑρίσκω “find” as evidence towards a diachronic solution of the matching-problem in ancient Greek complementation’, Philologia Classica15.2, 191-207.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Roi, E. la.2022. ‘Weaving together the diverse threads of category change. Intersubjective ἀμέλει “of course” and imperative particles in ancient Greek’, Diachronica39.2, 159-192.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Roi, E. la.2025a. ‘Connecting intersubjectivity, politeness and stance with wishes in the post-classical Greek papyri’, in K.Bentein (ed.), Everyday communication in antiquity. Frames and framings, Venetië, 69-93.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Roi, E. la.2025b. ‘Sources and methods for detecting language change from above and below in post-classical Greek and Latin’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics11.1, 173-201.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Roi, E. la. Te verschijnen. ‘The metaphorical pathways of performatives for intersubjective space. The evidence from Greek, Latin and Romance’, in L.van Beek en D.Kölligan (eds.), Conceptual metaphors in ancient Indo-European languages. Comparative perspectives, Berlijn/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Roi, E. la en PrataliMaffei (eds.). 2025. Themanummer ‘Language change from above and below’, Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics11.1.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Schwartz, M.A.1981. Ilias en Odyssee, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Siemund, P.2018. Speech acts and clause types. English in a cross-linguistic context, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Soltic, J.2015. ‘Parenthetical “I say (you)” in late medieval Greek vernacular. A message-structuring discourse marker rather than a message-conveying verb’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics16.2, 187-217.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sweetser, E.1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Thijs, K.2017. ‘The Attic particle μήν. Intersubjectivity, contrast and polysemy’, Journal of Greek Linguistics17.1, 73-112.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Traugott, E.C.2003. ‘From subjectification to intersubjectification’, in R.Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, Cambridge, 124-140.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Unceta Gómez, L. en Ł.Berger (eds.). 2022. Politeness in ancient Greek and Latin, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Verano Liaño, R. (ed.). Te verschijnen. Conversation analysis and classics. Talk-in-interaction in Greek and Latin literature, Leiden/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zanker, A.T.2019. Metaphor in Homer. Time, speech, and thought, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]