2004
Volume 58, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

Abstract

If Yoder is right in holding that pacifism is the appropriate behaviour for the Christian community, how does this relate to what we may expect from God? The answer depends on the question whether God and humans are both bound by one universal morality. In this paper it is argued that the existence of such a universal morality doesn’t warrant divine beneficence toward humans. Such a morality also fails to account for God’s being-God and does not consider the limited scope of morality as an instrument to direct human welfare. Conceding this, however, does not preclude the possibility of a theodicy; such a theodicy stems not from an alledged universal morality, but from God’s own goodness. Despite falling short of justifying Divine pacifism, such a perspective may nevertheless provide reasons to question Divine violence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2004.3.005.BOER
2004-07-01
2023-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2004.3.005.BOER
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error