2004
Volume 74, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

Abstract

Reacting positively to Markus Davidsen’s call for a Dutch programme of systematic study of religion, this response highlights certain points of discussion that should be considered moving forward. First of all, we should consider letting students get familiar with theories about religion earlier in the curriculum. Secondly, philological competences should not be placed above other methodological competences. Thirdly, our comparative methods should be informed by postmodernist critiques. Fourthly, we should be careful when applying cognitive theory by understanding its limitations. Finally, it remains unclear why methodological naturalism is the only way to move forward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2020.3.006.STER
2020-07-01
2021-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/25426583/74/3/06_NTT2020_3_STER.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2020.3.006.STER&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2020.3.006.STER
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error