2004
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Abstract

The finding that ethnic prejudice is particularly weakly developed among those with interethnic friendships is often construed as confirming the so-called ‘contact theory’, which holds that interethnic contact reduces racial prejudice. This theory raises cultural-sociological suspicions, however, because of its tendency to reduce culture to an allegedly ‘more fundamental’ realm of social interaction. Analysing data from the first wave of the European Social Survey, we therefore test the theory alongside an alternative cultural-sociological theory about culturally driven processes of contact selection. We find that whereas interethnic friendships are indeed culturally driven, which confirms our cultural-sociological theory, contacts with neighbours and colleagues do indeed affect ethnic prejudice. They moreover do so in a manner that is more complex and culturally sensitive than contact theory suggests: while positive cultural stances vis-à-vis ethnic diversity lead interethnic contact to decrease ethnic prejudice, negative ones rather lead the former to increase the latter.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/SOC2018.2/3.005.MANE
2019-03-01
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aberson, C.L., C. Shoemaker en C. Tomolillo(2004)Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3): 335-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, J. en P. Smith (2003)The strong program in cultural sociology: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In: J.Alexander (red.) The meanings of social life: A cultural sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 11-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allport, G.W. (1979 [1954]) The nature of prejudice. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Altemeyer, R.(1998)The other ‘authoritarian personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 47-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bail, C.A.(2008)The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review, 73(1): 37-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barlow, F.K.et al.(2012)The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12): 1629-1643.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biggs, M. en S. Knauss(2012)Explaining membership in the British National Party: A multilevel analysis of contact and threat. European Sociological Review, 28(5): 633-646.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Binder, J., H. Zagefka, R. Brown, F. Funke, T. Kessler, A. Mummendy, S. Demoulin en J. Leyens(2009)Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4): 843-856.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coenders, M.(2001)Nationalistic attitudes and ethnic exclusionism in a comparative perspective: An empirical study of attitudes toward the country and ethnic immigrants in 22 countries. Proefschrift, Universiteit Nijmegen.
  10. De Souza Briggs, X.(2007)‘Some of my best friends are…’: Interracial friendships, class, and segregation in America. City and Community, 6(4): 263-290.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dhont, K. en A. Van Hiel(2009)We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46: 172-177.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dick, R.van, U.Wagner, T.F.Pettigrew, O.Christ, C.Wolf, T.Petzel, V.Castro en J.S. Jackson(2004)The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 211-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, J.C.(2006)The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces, 84(4): 2179-2204.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dixon, J.C. en M.S. Rosenbaum(2004)Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-black and anti-Hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2): 257-280.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Douglas, M.(1978)Cultural bias. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
  16. Duyvendak, J.W.(2004)De individualisering van de samenleving en de toekomst van de sociologie. Sociologische Gids, 51(1): 495-506
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eller, A. en D. Abrams(2003)‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1): 55-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Eller, A. en D. Abrams(2004)Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3): 229-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Emler, N. en E. Frazer(1999)Politics: The education effect. Oxford Review of Education, 25(1-2): 251-273.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Escandell, X. en A.M. Ceobanu(2009)When contact with immigrants matters: Threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain’s Comunidades Autónomas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1): 44-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gabennesch, H.(1972)Authoritarianism as world view. American Journal of Sociology, 77: 857-875.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gitlin, T.(1980)The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  23. Goffman, E.(1974)Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  24. Graaf, P.M. de en M. Kalmijn(1995)Culturele en economische beroepsstatus: Een evaluatie van subjectieve en objectieve benaderingen. Mens en Maatschappij, 70: 152-165.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Graaf, P.M. de en M.Kalmijn(2001)Trends in the intergenerational transmission of cultural and economic status. Acta Sociologica, 44(1): 51-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Granovetter, M.S.(1973)The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hagendoorn, L.(1995)intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology, 6: 199-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hainmueller, J. en D.J. Hopkins(2014)Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17: 225-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Henrich, J., S.J. Heine en A. Norenzayan(2010)The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 61-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hewstone, M.(2015)Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2): 417-438.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hodson, G.(2008)Interracial prison contact: The pros for (social dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47: 325-351.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hodson, G., H. Harry en A. Mitchell(2009)Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4): 509-525.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Houtman, D.(2003)Class and politics in contemporary social science: ‘Marxism lite’ and its blind spot for culture. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  34. Houtman, D. en P. Achterberg (2016)Quantitative analysis in cultural sociology: Why it should be done, how it can be done. In: D.Inglis en A.Almila (red.) Sage handbook of cultural sociology. London: Sage, 225-236.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Houtman, D., S. Aupers en W. de Koster (red.) (2011)Paradoxes of individualization: Social control and social conflict in contemporary modernity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  36. Husnu, S. en R.J. Crisp(2010)Elaboration enhances imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 943-950.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jackman, M.R. en M. Crane(1986)‘Some of my best friends are black…’: Interracial friendship and white’s racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(4): 459-486.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jowell, R. en the Central Coordinating Team, European Social Survey (2002/2003). Technical report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.
  39. Kalmijn, M.(1991)Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2): 496-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kalmijn, M.(1994)Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2): 422-452.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kalmijn, M.(1998)Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 395-421.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kinder, D.R. en C.D. Kam(2009)US against them. Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  43. Koster, W. de, P. Achterberg, D. Houtman en J. van der Waal(2010)Van God los: Post-Christelijk cultureel conflict in Nederland. Sociologie, 6(3): 27-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kouvo, A. en C. Lockmer(2013)Imagine all the neighbours: Perceived neighbourhood ethnicity, interethnic friendship ties and perceived ethnic threat in four Nordic countries. Urban Studies, 50(16): 3305-3322.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kunovich, R.M.(2004)Social structural position and prejudice: An exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Social Science Research, 33(1): 20-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Laar, C.van, S.Levin, S.Sinclair en J. Sidanius(2005)The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41: 329-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Laar, C. van, S. Levin en J. Sidanius(2008)Ingroup and outgroup Contact: A longitudinal study of the effects of cross-ethnic friendships, dates, roommate relationships and participation in segregated organizations. In: U.Wagner, L.R.Tropp, G.Finchilescu en C.Tredoux (red.) Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford: Blackwell, 127-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Laurence, J.(2014)Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: Does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations?Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(8): 1328-1349.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Levin, S., C. van Laar en J. Sidanius(2003)The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6: 76-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Manevska, K.(2014)Beyond the ethnic divide. Towards a cultural-sociological understanding of ethnocentrism. Proefschrift, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Marsden, P.V.(1988)Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10(1): 57-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Martinovic, B., F. van Tubergen en I. Maas(2009)Dynamics of interethnic contact: A panel study of immigrants in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 25(3): 303-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McLaren, L.M.(2003)Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3): 909-936.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Meuleman, B.(2009)the influence of macro-sociological factors on attitudes toward immigration in Europe. A cross-cultural and contextual approach. Proefschrift, KU Leuven.
  55. Norris, P. en R. Inglehart(2004)Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Paolini, S., M. Hewstone, E. Cairns en A. Voci(2004)Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of catholics and protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reducing mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30: 770-786.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Petermann, S. en K. Schönwälder(2012)Gefährdet Multikulturalität tatsächlich Vertrauen und Solidarität? Eine Replik. Leviathan, 40(4): 482-490.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Pettigrew, T.F.(1997)Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23: 173-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Pettigrew, T.F.(1998)Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49: 65-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Pettigrew, T.F. en L.R. Tropp(2008)How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38: 922-934.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Pettigrew, T.F. en L.R. Tropp(2011)When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York: Psychology Press.
  62. Pettigrew, T.F., L.R. Tropp, U. Wagner en O. Christ(2011)Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35: 271-280.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Pettigrew, T.F. en L.T. Tropp(2006)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5): 751-783.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Powers, D.A. en C.G. Ellison(1995)Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74: 205-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Putnam, R.D.(2007)E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30: 137-174.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Schalk-Soekar, S.R.G., F.J.R. Vijver en M. van de Hoogsteder(2004)Attitudes toward multiculturalism of immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28(6): 533-550.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Schmid, K., A. Al Ramiah en M. Hewstone(2014)Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3): 665-674.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Schneider, S.(2008)Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1): 53-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sears, D.O.(1986)College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 515-530.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Semyonov, M. en A. Glikman(2009)Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review, 25(6): 693-708.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sidanius, J., S. Levin, C. van Laar en D.O. Sears(2008)The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  72. Sigelman, L. en S. Welch(1993)The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71(3): 781-795.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Stolle, D., S. Petermann, K. Schmid, K. Schönwälder, M. Hewstone, S. Vertovec, T. Schmitt en J. Heywood(2013)Immigration-related diversity and trust in German Cities: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23(3): 279-298.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Stolle, D., S. Soroka en R. Johnston(2008)When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56: 57-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Stubager, R.(2008)Education effects on authoritarian-libertarian values: A question of socialization. British Journal of Sociology, 59(2): 327-350.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Stubager, R.(2009)Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian-libertarian value conflict. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2): 204-233.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Vaisey, S. en O. Lizardo(2010)Can cultural worldviews influence network composition?Social Forces, 88(4): 1595-1618.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Vasta, E.(2007)From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5): 713-740.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Waal, J. van der en D. Houtman(2011)Tolerance in the postindustrial city: Assessing the ethnocentrism of less-educated natives in 22 Dutch cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47(5): 642-671.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Wagner, U., R. van Dick, T.F. Pettigrew en O. Christ(2003)Ethnic prejudice in East and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1): 22-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Welch, S. en L. Sigelman(2000)Getting to know you? Latino-Anglo social contact. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1): 67-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Wilson, T.C.(1996)Prejudice reduction or self-selection? A test of the contact hypothesis. Sociological Spectrum,16(1): 43-60.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/SOC2018.2/3.005.MANE
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/SOC2018.2/3.005.MANE
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error