OSD2F: An Open-Source Data Donation Framework | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9085

Abstract

Abstract

The digital traces that people leave through their use of various online platforms provide tremendous opportunities for studying human behavior. However, the collection of these data is hampered by legal, ethical, and technical challenges. We present a framework and tool for collecting these data through a where consenting participants can securely submit their digital traces. This approach leverages recent developments in data rights that have given people more control over their own data, such as legislation that now mandates companies to make digital trace data available on request in a machine-readable format. By transparently requesting access to specific parts of this data for clearly communicated academic purposes, the data ownership and privacy of participants is respected, and researchers are less dependent on commercial organizations that store this data in proprietary archives. In this paper we outline the general design principles, the current state of the tool, and future development goals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU
2022-10-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/26659085/4/2/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Araujo, T., Wonneberger, A., Neijens, P., & Vreese, C. de. (2017). How Much Time Do You Spend Online? Understanding and Improving the Accuracy of Self-Reported Measures of Internet Use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ausloos, J., & Dewitte, P. (2018). Shattering one-way mirrors – data subject access rights in practice. International Data Privacy Law, 8(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy001
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ausloos, J., & Veale, M. (2020). Researching with Data Rights. Technology and Regulation, 2020, 136–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., Petkevic, V., & Wiradhany. (2021). Presenting a Novel Data Collection and Automated Processing Approach for iOS Smartphone Data. 71st Annual ICA Conference, Virtual Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodó, B., Helberger, N., Irion, K., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Moller, J., van de Velde, B., Bol, N., van Es, B., de Vreese, C., IViR (FdR), & Political Communication & Journalism (ASCoR, FMG). (2017). Tackling the Algorithmic Control Crisis – the Technical, Legal, and Ethical Challenges of Research into Algorithmic Agents. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 19, 133–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeschoten, L., Ausloos, J., Moeller, J., Araujo, T., & Oberski, D. L. (2020). Digital trace data collection through data donation. ArXiv:2011.09851 [Cs, Stat].
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeschoten, L., Mendrik, A., van der Veen, E., Vloothuis, J., Hu, H., Voorvaart, R., & Oberski, D. (2022). Privacy preserving local analysis of digital trace data: A proof-of-concept. Patterns,3(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100444
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinberg, M., Vanderbilt, R. R., Solomon, D. H., Brinberg, D., & Ram, N. (2021). Using technology to unobtrusively observe relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 02654075211028654. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211028654
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Christner, C., Urman, A., Adam, S., & Maier, M. (2021). Automated Tracking Approaches for Studying Online Media Use: A Critical Review and Recommendations. Communication Methods and Measures, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1907841
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Freelon, D. (2018). Computational Research in the Post-API Age. Political Communication, 35(4), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halavais, A. (2019). Overcoming terms of service: A proposal for ethical distributed research. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1627386
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kobayashi, T., & Boase, J. (2012). No Such Effect? The Implications of Measurement Error in Self-Report Measures of Mobile Communication Use. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679243
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lazer, D., Hargittai, E., Freelon, D., Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Munger, K., Ognyanova, K., & Radford, J. (2021). Meaningful measures of human society in the twenty-first century. Nature, 595(7866), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03660-7
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Menchen-Trevino, E. (2016). Web historian: Enabling multi-method and independent research with real-world web browsing history data. https://doi.org/10.9776/16611
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohme, J., Araujo, T., de Vreese, C. H., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2020). Mobile data donations: Assessing self-report accuracy and sample biases with the iOS Screen Time function. Mobile Media & Communication, 2050157920959106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920959106
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Puschmann, C. (2019). Beyond the Bubble: Assessing the Diversity of Political Search Results. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Reeves, B., Robinson, T., & Ram, N. (2020). Time for the Human Screenome Project. Nature, 577(7790), 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00032-5
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Scharkow, M. (2016). The Accuracy of Self-Reported Internet Use—A Validation Study Using Client Log Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Verbeij, T., Pouwels, J. L., Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2021). The accuracy and validity of self-reported social media use measures among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2022.2.001.ARAU
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error