2004
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Abstract

The channelling discontent thesis contends that populist parties form an efficacious exhaust valve, providing their voters with democratic fulfilment. Building on in-depth interviews with PVV-voters and (deliberate) non-voters, I assess that assumption by comparing these citizens’ political efficacy. The analysis shows that differences in political efficacy are not explained by voting behaviour, as the thesis would assume, but rather by the inductively conceptualized dimension of power orientation. This highlights not just the value, but also the (future) potential of a cultural-sociological approach to studying the political domain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/SOC2018.2/3.006.KEMM
2019-03-01
2021-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akkerman, A., C. Mudde en A. Zaslove(2014)How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9): 1324-1353.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Almond, G.A. en S. Verba(1963)The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  3. Anderson, B. (1991 [1983]) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  4. Aslanidis, P.(2015)Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective, Political Studies, doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12224.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennettt, E.A., A. Cordner, P.T. Klein, S. Savell en G. Baiocchi(2013)Disavowing politics: Civic engagement in an era of political skepticism, American Journal of Sociology, 119 (2): 518-548.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blumer, H.(1954)What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review, 19(1): 3-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brug, W. van der(2003)How the LPF fuelled discontent: empirical tests of explanations of LPF support. Acta Politica, 38: 89-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell, A., G. Gurin and W. Miller(1954)The voter decides. Evanstone: Row Peterson.
  9. Canovan, M.(1999)Trust the people: Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1): 2-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caprara, G.V., M. Vecchione, C. Capanna and M. Mebane(2009)Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 1002-1020.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek
    Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek(2011)Verkiezingen: Participatie, vertrouwen en integratie. Den Haag: CBS.
  12. Charmaz, K.(2006)Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
  13. Dekker, P. (red.) (2009)Niet stemmers – actualisatie. Den Haag: SCP.
  14. Doppelt, J.C. en E. Shearer(1999)Non-voters: America’s no-shows. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  15. Driessen, M. en P. Kanne(2018)Versterking lokale democratie. Rapport in opdracht van het ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, rapportnummer 2018/89, Amsterdam: I&O Research.
  16. Elchardus, M. en B. Spruyt(2012)Populisme en de zorg over de samenleving. Sociologie, 8(1): 119-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eliasoph, N. en Lichterman, P.(2010)Making things political. In: J.R.Hall, L.Grindstaff en M-C.Lo (red.) Handbook of cultural sociology. New York: Routledge, 483-493.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Glaser, B.G. en A. Strauss(1967)The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
  19. Guba, E.G. en Y.S. Lincoln(1994)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N.K.Denzin en Y.S.Lincoln (red.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 105-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hay, C.(2007)Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity.
  21. Hooghe, M. en S. Marien(2013)A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1): 131-152.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Houtman, D., P. Achterberg en R. Kemmers(2012)De wedergeboorte van de fact-free politics: Pim Fortuyn en de nieuwe tegencultuur (2002-2012). Beleid en Maatschappij, 38(2): 179-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kemmers, R.(2017)Channelling discontent? Non-voters, populist party voters, and their meaningful political agency. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4(4): 381-406.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kemmers, R., S. Aupers, D. Houtman en J. van der Waal(2015)State of disgrace: Popular political discontents about the Dutch state in the 2000s. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(3): 476-493.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kemmers, R., S. Aupers en J. van der Waal(2016)Becoming politically discontented: Anti-establishment careers of Dutch non-voters and PVV voters. Current Sociology, 64(5): 757-774.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kemmers, R., J. van der Waal en W. de Koster(2018)Burgers op afstand: naar een beter begrip van ontevreden burgers. In: S.L.de Lange en J.Zuure (red.) #WOEST: de kracht van verontwaardiging. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 72-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kochuyt, T. en K. Abts(2012)De politieke kruisweg van een miskend volk. Over populistische beeldvormingen en de aanmaak van een kiespubliek. Sociologie, 8(1): 96-118.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kornhauser, W. (1998 [1960]) The politics of mass society. New York: Routledge.
  29. Kriesi, H.(2014)The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2): 361-378.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lijphart, A.(1968)Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek. Haarlem: H.J.W. Becht.
  31. Melucci, A.(1980)The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 19(2): 199-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Moffitt, B. en S. Tormey(2014)Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62: 381-397.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mudde, C.(2004)The populist zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(3): 541-563.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mudde, C.(2007)Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Mudde, C.(2010)The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6): 1167-1186.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mudde, C. en C. Rovira Kaltwasser (2012)Populism and (liberal) democracy: a framework for analysis. In: C. Mudde en C. Rovira Kaltwasser (red.) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nash, K.(2000)Contemporary political sociology: Globalization, politics and power. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  38. Pharr, S.J. en R.D. Putnam (red.) (2000)Disaffected democracies. What’s troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  39. Plattner, M.F.(2010)Populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 21(1): 81-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rooduijn, M.(2013)A populist zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rooduijn, M., W. van der Brug and S.L. de Lange(2016)Expressing or felling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43: 32-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rovira Kaltwasser, C.(2012)The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2): 184-208.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Schattschneider, E.E.(1960)The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  44. Shyrane, N., E. Fieldhouse en A. Pickles(2006)Abstainers are not all the same: A latent class analysis of heterogeneity in the British electorate in 2005. CCSR Working Paper Series, 2006-03.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stoker, G.(2006)Why politics matters. Making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  46. Taggart, P.(2000)Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  47. Taylor, C.(2007)Cultures of democracy and citizen efficacy. Public Culture, 19(1): 117-150.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tocqueville, A. de (1998 [1840]) Democracy in America (abridged). Chatham: Wordsworth Editions.
  49. Weber, M. (1978 [1968]) Economy & society: An outline of interpretive sociology (red. G.Roth en C.Wittich). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  50. Wuthnow, R.(2002)Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/SOC2018.2/3.006.KEMM
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error