2004
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0778-8304
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9484

Abstract

Abstract

Over the course of the nineteenth century, the rite of circumcision became a hotly debated issue in several Jewish communities across Europe. All European countries followed their own path in the circumcision debates, depending on the country’s political and social environment. The Dutch circumcision debates concentrated exclusively on the medical and hygienic improvement of the rite. Between 1820 and 1890, the quickly expanding medical knowledge had far reaching effects on the rite of circumcision in the Netherlands: the rite was centralized, circumcisers were examined on surgical skills, strict surgical protocols applied to the circumcision procedure, and ultimately, the traditional rite of circumcision was altered to meet the latest medical standards. The growing influence of medicine on the religiously important circumcision led to a heated discussion within the Dutch Jewish community; the circumcision debates offered an arena in which different factions within the Dutch Jewish community fought over the balance between the religious and medical aspects of circumcision. This article discusses the course of the Dutch circumcision debates of the nineteenth century, the influence of international circumcision debates and the changing perception of circumcision within the Dutch Jewish community.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TRA2019.1.001.POST
2019-05-01
2021-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/07788304/28/1/02_TRA2019.1_POST.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TRA2019.1.001.POST&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amsterdam, Stadsarchief, Nederlands Israëlitisch Kerkgenootschap (SA).
  2. The Hague, Nationaal Archief, Hoofdcommissie tot de zaken der Israëliten (NA).
  3. Bell, Catherine, Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions. New York, 1997.
  4. Berkovitz, Jay R., Rites and Passages. The Beginnings of Modern Jewish Culture in France, 1650-1860. Philadelphia, 2007.
  5. Glick, Leonard B., Marked in Your Flesh. Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America. Oxford, 2005.
  6. Hödl, Klaus, ‘Die deutschsprachige Beschneidungsdebatte im 19. Jahrhundert.’Aschkenas, 13(2003)1, 189–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Houwaart, Eddy, De hygiënisten. Artsen, staat & volksgezondheid in Nederland, 1840-1890. Groningen, 1991.
  8. Judd, Robin, Contested Rituals. Circumcision, Kosher Butchering, and Jewish Political Life in Germany, 1843-1933. Ithaca, 2007.
  9. Katz, Jacob, ‘The Controversy Over the Metzizah’, in: Ibid., Divine Law in Human Hands. Case Studies in Halakhic Flexibility (Jerusalem, 1998), 357–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallet, Bart, Nieuwe Nederlanders: de integratie van joden in Nederland 1814-1851. Amsterdam, 2009.
  11. Wallet, Bart, ‘“Godsdienstzin, beschaving en arbeidzaamheid”. De centralisatie en nationalisering van Nederlandse joden (1814-1870),’ in: HansBlom, D.J.Wertheim, HettyBerg and BartWallet (red.) Geschiedenis van de joden in Nederland (Amsterdam, 2017), 221–274.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TRA2019.1.001.POST
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TRA2019.1.001.POST
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): brit milah; circumcision; Judaism; Netherlands; rituals
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error