Editorial: Dis/abling gender in crisis times

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, M., & Merrell, F. (2001). End notes: Semiotically digesting dis/ability. In L.J.Rogers, & B.B.Swadener (Eds.), Semiotics and dis/ability: Interrogating categories of difference (pp. 267–272). New York: SUNY Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Annamma, S.A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/Ability Critical Race Studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Archer, S.L. (2020, November2). 5 failings of the Great Barrington Declaration’s dangerous plan for COVID-19 natural herd immunity. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/5-failings-of-the-great-barrington-declarations-dangerous-plan-for-covid-19-natural-herd-immunity-148975
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barad, K. (2001). Scientific literacy ---> Agential literacy = (Learning + doing) Science responsibly. In M.Mayberry, B.Subramaniam, & L.H.Weasel (Eds.), Feminist science studies: A new generation (pp. 226–246). New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ben-Moshe, L., Champan, C., & Carey, A.C. (2014). Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the U.S. and Canada. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bone, K. (2017). Trapped behind the glass: Crip theory and disability identity. Disability & Society, 32(9), 1297–1314.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bourke, J. (1996). Dismembering the male: Men’s bodies, Britain and the Great War. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bracke, S. (2016). Bouncing back: Vulnerability and resistance in times of resilience. In J.Butler, Z.Gambetti & L.Sabsay (Eds.), Vulnerability in resistance (pp. 52–75). Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Braidotti, R. (2020). ‘We’ are in this together, but we are not one and the same. Bioethical Inquiry, 17, 465–469.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex.’London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chen, M.Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, racial mattering, and queer affect. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Jong, S., Icaza, R., Vázquez, R., & Withaeckx, S. (Eds.) (2017). Decolonising the university [Special issue]. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 20(3).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cryle, P., & Stephens, E. (2017). Normality, a critical genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Wachter, D. (2012). Borderline times: Het einde van de normaliteit. Leuven: LannooCampus.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Disability Visibility Project. (2021). Retrieved from https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com
21. Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863–883.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ferrigon, P. (2019). Person-first language vs. identity-first language: An examination of the gains and drawbacks of Disability Language in society. Journal of Teaching Disability Studies, 1. Retrieved from https://jtds.commons.gc.cuny.edu/person-first-language-vs-identity-first-language-an-examination-of-the-gains-and-drawbacks-of-disability-language-in-society
    [Google Scholar]
23. Forestell, N.M. (2006). ‘And I feel like I’m dying from mining for gold’: Disability, gender, and the mining community, 1920–1950. Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas, 3(3), 77–93.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Foucault, M. (2003a). The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception (A.M.Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Foucault, M. (2003b). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975 (G.Burchell, Trans.). New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fritsch, K. (2016). Cripping neoliberal futurity: Marking the elsewhere and elsewhen of desiring otherwise. Feral Feminisms, 5, 11–26.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gallop, J. (2018). Sexuality, disability, and aging. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Garland-Thomson, R. (2006). Ways of staring. Journal of Visual Culture, 5(2), 173–192.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Geerts, E., Withaeckx, S., & Van den Brandt, N. (Eds.) (2018). Superdiversity: A critical intersectional investigation [Special issue]. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 21(1).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/Ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hall, K.Q. (Ed.) (2011). Feminist disability studies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Haraway, D.J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hickey-Moody, A., & Crowley, V. (2010). Disability matters: Pedagogy, media and affect. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 31(4), 399–409.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hughes, B. (2007). Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22(7), 673–684.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hunt-Kennedy, S. (2020). Between fitness and death: Disability and slavery in the Caribbean. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kafer, P. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kuuliala, J. (2020). Saints, infirmity, and community in the Late Middle Ages. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ladd-Taylor, M. (2017). Fixing the poor: Eugenic sterilization and child welfare in the twentieth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McGuire, C.A. (2020). Measuring difference, numbering normal: Setting the standards for disability in the interwar period. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: NYU press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. McRuer, R. (2011). Disabling sex: Notes for a crip theory of sexuality. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17(1), 107–117.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies?Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Miettinen, R. (2020). ‘Disabled’ minds: Mental impairments and dis/ability in early modern Sweden. Frühneuzeit-Info, 31, 54–69.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Mingus, M. (2011, February12). Changing the framework: Disability justice: How our communities can move beyond access to wholeness. Leaving Evidence. Retrieved from https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice
    [Google Scholar]
47. Minich, J.A. (2016). Enabling whom? Critical Disability Studies now. Lateral, 5(1). doi:10.25158/L5.1.9
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mohamed, K., & Shefer, T. (2015). Gendering disability and disabling gender: Critical reflections on intersections of gender and disability. Agenda, 29(2), 2–13.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Nair, A. (2020). ‘These curly-bearded, olive-skinned warriors’: Medicine, prosthetics, rehabilitation and the disabled Sepoy in the First World War, 1914–1920. Social History of Medicine, 33(3), 798–818.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nash, J.C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nolte, C., Frohne, B., Halle, U., & Kerth, S. (Eds.). (2017). Dis/ability history der Vormoderne. Ein Handbuch. Premodern dis/ability history. A companion. Affalterbach: Didymos-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Parker, A.M. (2015). Intersecting histories of gender, race, and disability. Journal of Women’s History, 27(1), 178–186.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Piepzna-Samarasinha, L.L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Puar, J.K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Rembis, M. (2017). Disabling domesticity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Roets, G., & Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadology and subjectivity: Deleuze, Guattari and critical disability studies. In D.Goodley, B.Hughes, & L.Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory (pp. 161–178). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Roggeband, C., Bonjour, S., & Mügge, L.M. (2016). Gender in het curriculum: marginaal of integraal?Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 19(2), 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Rose, S.F. (2017). No right to be idle: The invention of disability, 1840s–1930s. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Samuels, E. (2011). Examining Millie and Christine McKoy: Where enslavement and enfreakment meet. Signs, 37(1), 53–81.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schalk, S. (2017). Critical disability studies as methodology. Lateral, 6(1). doi: 10.25158/L6.1.13
    [Google Scholar]
61. Scully, J.L. (2014). Disability and vulnerability: On bodies, dependence, and power. In C.Mackenzie, W.Rogers, & S.Dodds (Eds.). Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 204–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Smith, B., & Hutchinson, B. (Eds). (2004). Gendering disability. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Stiker, H.J. (1999). A history of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Tremain, S. (Ed.). (2006). Foucault and the government of disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Turner, D.M., & Blackie, D. (2018). Disability in the Industrial Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Van Ertvelde, A., Cornette, J., Van Goidsenhoven, L., & Hadad, N. (2021). CRIP. rekto:verso, 80. Retrieved from https://www.rektoverso.be/dossier/crip
    [Google Scholar]
68. Waldschmidt, A. (2018). Disability–culture–society: Strengths and weaknesses of a cultural model of dis/ability. Alter, 12(2), 65–78.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation–an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.
    [Google Scholar]