‘Work!’ Ballroom discipline, faking, and the production of queer freedom | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 25 Number 4
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

This article gives insight into the ballroom scene in the Netherlands, in which queers of colour find a safe space that enables what they call individual ‘transformation’ towards becoming their ‘free-selves’. During lessons and club events called ‘balls’ their performances are constantly evaluated and corrected, as co-students, teachers, audiences, and judges at the end of the runway exhort them to ‘work’ and ‘fake it’. Understanding ballroom as a form of minoritarian liberalism, this article uses these phrases to explore through what precise operations of self ballroom generates a form of queer freedom. Drawing on post-secular theories of docility, imitation and agency, we show that the cultivation of queer ‘free-selves’ is arduous and requires incessant individual and collective disciplinary labour. By disciplining the body to the outer, scripted performance of alternative gendered ways of being, the inner self changes accordingly. It can become the free and confident self that the body has been taught to imitate and display. Ballroom’s critical force does not lie solely in its queering of dominant constellations of sex and gender, but also in its queering of the operation and meaning of freedom.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2022.4.003.PULL
2022-12-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/25/4/TVGN2022.4.003.PULL.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2022.4.003.PULL&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baer, P. (2021). Vogue femme as affective anti-oppression education. In A.Harris & S.Holman Jones (Eds.), Affective movements, methods and pedagogies (pp. 41–59). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, M. (2011). Gender/racial realness: Theorizing the gender system in ballroom culture. Feminist Studies, 37(2), 356–386.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, M. (2013). Butch queens up in pumps: Gender, performance, and ballroom culture in Detroit. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bock, E. (2021). Cultivating (in)attention, listening to noise. Invisible Culture, 32. https://doi.org/10.47761/494a02f6.eb27df12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boston, N. & Duyvendak, J. W. (2015). People of color mobilization in LGBT organisations in the Netherlands and the United States. In D.Paternotte & M.Tremblay (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to lesbian and gay activism (pp. 15–148). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chatzipapatheodoridis, C. (2017). Strike a pose, forever: The legacy of vogue and its re- contextualization in contemporary camp performances. European Journal of American Studies, 11(3), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Colpani, G. & Isenia, W.J. (2018). Strange fruits: Queer of color intellectual labor in the Netherlands in the 1980s and 1990s. In S.Ponzanesi & A. J.Habed (Eds.), Postcolonial intellectuals in Europe. Critics, artists, movements, and their publics (pp. 213–230). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Colpani, G., Isenia, W.J., & Pieter, N. (2019). Archiving queer of colour politics in the Netherlands. A roundtable conversation. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 22(2), 163–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dave, N. (2012). Queer activism in Indian. A story in the anthropology of ethics. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R.Castronovo & D. D.Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politic (pp. 175–194). Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fadil, N. (2013). Performing the salat at work: Secular and pious muslims negotiating the contours of the public in Belgium. Ethnicities, 13(6), 729–750.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank, C. (2019). Sister outsider and Audre Lorde in the Netherlands: On transnational queer feminism and archival methodological practices. Feminist Review, 121, 9–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Tayeb, F. (2012). “Gays who cannot properly be gay”: Queer muslims in the neoliberal European city. European Journal of Woman’s Studies, 19(1), 79–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J.W. (2011). Queer Netherlands: A puzzling example. Amsterdam Research Centre for Gender and Sexuality, 14(6), 625–631.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hosking, T. (2019). De ballroomscene is het zat dat iedereen met hun cultuur aan de haal gaat. Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/nl/article/a3xmje/de-ballroomleiders-vechten-tegen-toe-eigening-van-afgelopen-jaren.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jivraj, S., & de Jong, A. (2011). The Dutch homo-emancipation policy and its silencing effects on queer muslims. Feminist Legal Studies, 19(2), 143–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. King, R. S. (2015). When we start thinking: Charl Landvreugd’s multivalent Afropean aesthetic. Small axe [Carribean Queer Visualities], 19(1), 60–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Knijnenburg, L. (2021). “Kom naar de balls, honey, en vind jezelf”. De Groene Amsterdammer, 50–52. Retrieved from https://www.groene.nl/artikel/komnaar-de-balls-honey-en-vind-jezelf.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kunsthal (2021). Deep in vogue. Celebrating ballroom culture. [Exhibition] Rotterdam: Kunsthal Rotterdam, 18September2021 until 13March2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lino e Silva, M. (2022). Minoritarian liberalism. Travesti life in a Brazilian favela. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16(2), 202–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayanthi, L. (2010). Reconfiguring freedom: Muslim piety and the limits of secular law and public discourse in France. American Ethnologist, 37(1), 19–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mepschen, P., Duyvendak, J.W., & Tonkens, E.H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5), 962–979.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages. Homonationalism in queer times. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wekker, G. (2016). White innocence, paradoxes of colonialism and race. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilf, E. (2010). Swinging within the iron cage: Modernity, creativity, and embodied practice in American postsecondary jazz education. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 563–582.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilf, E. (2012). Rituals of creativity: Tradition, modernity, and the ‘acoustic unconscious’ in a U.S. collegiate jazz music program. American Ethnologist, 114(1), 32–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yildiz, A. (2016). “Turkish, Dutch, gay and proud”: Mapping out the contours of agency in homonationalist times. Sexualities, 20(5–6), 699–714.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zemke, K. & Mackley-Crump, J. (2019). “Sissy that walk”: Reframing queer Pacific bodies through the FAFSWAG Ball. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 4(1), 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2022.4.003.PULL
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2022.4.003.PULL
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error