Please leave the emergency lane in an orderly fashion | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 26, Issue 3/4
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, I propose the hypothesis that in contemporary western normative motherhood, pregnancy and (early) motherhood are often perceived as a temporary fit of bewilderment, both physically, psychologically and socially. I introduce the metaphor of the emergency lane to express this state of exception. Mothers are granted temporary relief from certain expectations. However, the need to get back in shape and back to work – the need to leave the emergency lane – quickly, preferably unharmed, reveals the assumption that mothers in that early period are not fully regarded as people. Drawing on insights from maternal and critical disability scholars I argue that these norms are deeply ableist and affect all mothers. Moreover, I suggest that postponed motherhood might be linked to the fear of this emergency lane, and I use the decline theory, a concept from ageing studies, to make this argument.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.002.STRU
2023-12-01
2024-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/26/3/4/TVGN2023.3-4.002.STRU.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.002.STRU&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baraitser, L. (2008). Maternal encounters. The ethics of interruption. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baraitser, L. (2017). Enduring time. New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bratti, M., Meroni, E.C. & Pronzato, C. (2017). Motherhood postponement and wages in Europe. Ifo Dice Report, 15(2), 31-37. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dice-report-2017-2-bratti-meroni-pronzato-june.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benard, S., & Correll, S.J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender and Society, 24(5), 616-646. doi:10.1177/0891243210383142
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, F.A.K. (2008). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151-162. doi:10.1080/09687590701841190
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, F.A.K. (2014). Ableism as transformative practice. In: C.Cocker and T.Hafford Letchfields (eds). Rethinking anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive theories for social work practice (pp. 78-92). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coldwell, J., Meredith, P., Whittingham, K., & Ziviani, J. (2021). Shame and guilt in the postnatal period: a systematic review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 39(1), 67-85. doi:10.1080/02646838.2020.1754372
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daniels, J.N. (2019). Disabled mothering? Outlawed, overlooked and severely prohibited: Interrogating ableism in motherhood. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 114-123. doi:10.17645/si.v7i1.1551
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davids, T. (2022, December15). On the politicization of motherhood; between tradition and resistance. In: I.Arends, E.De Wit & J.Struyf (chairs). LOVA Winter School 2022. Lecture at LOVA, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Greef, R. (2022). Mamamorfose. Nijgh en Van Ditmar.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Breij, C. (2009). Krijg nou tieten: en andere zwangerschapsverschijnselen. Nieuw Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunford, E., & Granger, C. (2017). Maternal guilt and shame: Relationship to postnatal depression and attitudes toward help-seeking. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 1692-1701. doi:10.1007/s10826-017-0690-z
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ElliottS., Powell, R., & Brenton, J. (2015). Being a good mom: Low-income, Black single mothers negotiating intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues, 36(3), 351-370. doi:10.1177/0192513X13490279
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Faircloth, C. (2014). Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In: E.Lee, J.Bristow, C.Faircloth & J.Mavarish, Parenting culture studies (pp. 25-50). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fontenay, S., & Tojerow, I. (2020). Work Disability after Motherhood and How Paternity Leave Can Help. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13756.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox, B., & Neiterman, E. (2015). Embodied motherhood: Women’s feelings about their postpartum bodies. Gender & Society, 29(5), 670-693. doi:10.1177/0891243215591598
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy for the oppressed. New York: Seabury.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallop, J. (2019). Sexuality, disability and aging. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hänel, H.C., & Müller, J.M. (2022). Non-ideal philosophy as methodology. The case of feminist philosophy. Theoria, Issue 172, 69(3), 32-59. doi:10.3167/th.2022.6917202
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haynes, K. (2008). (Re)figuring accounting and maternal bodies: The gendered embodiment of accounting professionals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 328-348.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill Collins, P. (1994). Shifting the center: race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In: E. N.Glenn, G.Chang & L. R.Forcey (eds.). Mothering. Ideology, experience and agency (pp. 45-65). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. hooks, b. (2007 (1984)). Revolutionary parenting. In A.O’Reilly (ed.) Maternal theory: Essential readings (pp. 145-156). Toronto: Demeter Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis, T.A. (2022, January1). Working definition of ableism – January 2022 update. Talila A.Lewis. TL’s Blog. https://www.talilalewis.com/blog.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Limburg, J. (2022). Letters to my weird sisters: On autism, feminism and motherhood. London: Atlantic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lorde, A. (1984). Man child: a Black lesbian feminist’s response. In: Lorde, A.Sister outsider (pp. 72-80). Berkeley: Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Malacrida, C. (2009). Performing motherhood in a disablist world: dilemmas of motherhood, femininity and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(1), 99-117. doi:10.1080/09518390802581927
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McRuer, R. (2013). Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. In: L.J.Davis, The disability studies reader (pp. 395-405). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Meulenbelt, A. (2022). Alle moeders werken al: Pleidooi voor een zorgzame samenleving. Zutphen: Mazirel Pers.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Miri, A. (2022, December16). Working “with” or “on” Moroccan migrant mothers. In: I.Arends, E.De Wit & J.Struyf (chairs), LOVA Winter School 2022. Lecture at LOVA, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mosselman, I. (2022). Al die liefde en woede. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nederlands Centraal Planbureau. (2019) NOTITIE: Arbeidsparticipatie, gewerkte uren en economische zelfstandigheid van vrouwen.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Neiterman, E., & Fox, B. (2017). Controlling the unruly maternal body: Losing and gaining control over the body during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 142-148. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.029
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nelson, M. (2015). The argonauts. Minneapolis: Graywolf Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Brien Hallstein, L. (2010). White feminists and contemporary maternity: Purging matrophobia. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Brien Hallstein, L. (2015). Bikini-ready moms: Celebrity profiles, motherhood, and the body. SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Brien Hallstein, L. (2019). Mediated celebrity motherhood: Representing the norms, values, and practices promoted by and through celebrity moms. In: L.O’Brien Hallstein, A.O’Reilly and M.Giles (eds.). The Routledge companion to motherhood (pp. 133-146). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Patterson, M., & O’Malley, L. (2013). Bouncing back: Reclaiming the body from pregnancy. In: S.O’Donohoe, M.Hogg, P.MacLaren, L.Martens and L.Stevens (eds). Motherhoods, markets and consumption: The making of mothers in contemporary western cultures (pp. 131-144). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ollilainen, M. (2020). Ideal bodies at work: faculty mothers and pregnancy in academia. Gender and Education, 32(7), 961-976, doi:10.1080/09540253.2019.1632808
    [Google Scholar]
  41. O’Reilly, A. (2021, December9). Opening lecture. In: I.Arends & E.De Wit (chair), LOVA Winter School 2021. Lecture at LOVA, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Park, S.M. (2013). Mothering queerly, queering motherhood: resisting monomaternalism in adoptive, lesbian, blended, andpolygamous families. New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Poole, J., Jivraj, T., Arslanian, A., Bellows, K., Chiasson, S., Hakimy, H., … Reid, J. (2012). Sanism, ‘mental health’ and social work/education: A review and call to action. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice, 1, 20-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Price, M. (2015). The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain. Hypatia, 30(1), 268-284. doi:10.111/hypa.12127
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Prinds, C., Nikolajsen, H., & Folmann, B. (2020). Yummy mummy: the ideal of not looking like a mother. Woman and Birth, 33(3), 266-273. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.05.009
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pycke, K.D. (2010). What is internalised racial oppression and why don’t we study it? Acknowledging racism’s hidden injuries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(4), 551-572. doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reynolds, J.M., & Landre, A. (2022). Ableism and ageism. Insights from disability studies for aging studies. In: M.Goldman, T.Cole & K.de Medeiros (eds.). Critical humanities and ageing: Forging interdisciplinary dialogues (pp. 118-129). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rich, A. (1986 (1976)). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution (2nd ed). New York: W.W.Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ridgeway, C.L., & Correll, S.J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 683-700. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00380.x
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Roth, H., Homer, C., & Fenwick, J. (2012). “Bouncing back”: How Australia’s leading women’s magazines portray the postpartum ‘body’. Women and Birth, 25, 128-134. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2011.08.004
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sandahl, C. (2003). Queering the crip or cripping the queer?: Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. GLQ, 9(1-2), 25-56. doi: 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Scharff, C. (2014, April1). Gender and neoliberalism: Exploring the exclusions and contours of neoliberal subjectivities. Theory Culture Society. www.theoryculturesociety.org/christina-scharff-on-gender-and-neoliberalism
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Scharff, C. (2019). Editorial: Prepare her for sexism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(1), 3-8. doi:10.1177/1350506819885707
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Scope, J.H. (2005). Reflections on the no-uterus rule: Pregnancy, academia and feminist pedagogy. Feminist Teacher, 16(1), 53-60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40545953
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Skinner, T. (2011). Dyslexia, mothering and work: Intersecting identities, reframing, ‘drowning’ and resistance. Disability and Society, 26(2), 125-137. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.543859
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stanley, C. (2020, August28). What I want you to understand about the ‘supercrip’ stereotype. The Mighty. https://themighty.com/topic/blindness/challenging-the-supercrip-stereotype-of-people-with-disabilities/
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stelling, T. (2019, September14). Dit is de belangrijkste bron van ongelijkheid tussen man en vrouw in Nederland: baby’s. De Correspondent. https://decorrespondent.nl/10515/dit-is-de-belangrijkste-bron-van-ongelijkheid-tussen-man-en-vrouw-in-nederland-babys/1953035564205-df67f16c
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tyler, I. (2011). Pregnant beauty: Maternal femininities under neoliberalism. In: R.Gill & C.Scharff, New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 21-36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Van Goidsenhoven, L. (2017). Crip theory. In: J.De Bloois, S.De Cauwer & A.Masschelein. 50 key terms in contemporary cultural theory (pp. 95-96). Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Hove, H. (2017). Zwanger aan het werk. De ervaringen van sollicitanten, werkneemsters en zelfstandige onderneemsters in België. (D/2017/10.043/10) Instituut voor de gelijkheid van vrouwen en mannen. https://igvm-iefh.belgium.be/sites/default/files/107_-_zwanger_aan_het_werk_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolbring, G. (2008). The politics of ableism. Development, 51, 252-258. doi:10/1057/dev.2008.17
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Yancy, G. (2023, January3). Ableism enables all forms of inequity and hampers all liberation efforts. TRUTHOUT. https://truthout.org/articles/ableism-enables-all-forms-of-inequity-and-hampers-all-liberation-efforts
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Young, I.M. (2005). Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation. In: On female body experience. “Throwing like a girl” and other essays (pp. 46-61). Oxford: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.002.STRU
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error