Gendernormen in de kinderopvang | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 26, Issue 3/4
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, we describe to what extent culture-bound gender norms are reproduced in interactions between childcare workers and parents in daycare. This is important because more and more families want to share responsibilities for paid work and child rearing equally, but in many families this does not work out that way. Prevailing gender norms may provide an explanation for this. We used an online questionnaire to measure which implicit (gender/career IAT) and explicit gender beliefs (ideal amount of time spent on work or care for both father and mother) are held by childcare workers (n=259) and to what extent these beliefs and their different behaviour towards fathers and mothers is related. Although childcare workers with more traditional gender beliefs on the division of paid work by parents are more likely to inform and reach out to mothers, the relationships between beliefs and behaviour are not as strong as expected. An important finding is that the presence of more fathers in daycare is associated with more egalitarian behaviour of childcare workers. We suggest that the current tendency to approach mothers more often can be challenged by inviting more fathers and acknowledging them as the important parents they are.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.003.SARI
2023-12-01
2024-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/26/3/4/TVGN2023.3-4.003.SARI.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.003.SARI&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Besluit Kwaliteit Kinderopvang. (2017). Geraadpleegd via https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0017017/2023-06-20
  2. Brewsaugh, K., Masyn, K.E., & Salloum, A. (2018). Child welfare workers’ sexism and beliefs about father involvement. Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 132–144. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.029
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carpenter, T.P., Pogacar, R., Pullig, C., Kouril, M., Aguilar, S., LaBouff, J., . . . Chakroff, A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2194–2208. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabrera, N.J., Volling, B.L., & Barr, R. (2018). Fathers are parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 152–157. doi:10.1111/cdep.12275
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CBS. (2022). Wie zorgt er voor de kinderen? Geraadpleegd via http://www.cbs.nl (op 26april2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chapman, R. (2022). Moving beyond ‘gender-neutral’: Creating gender expansive environments in early childhood education. Gender and Education, 34(1), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Charlesworth, T.E.S., & Banaji, M.R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 14–26. doi:10.1177/1948550620988425
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Corneille, O., & Béna, J. (2022). The ‘implicit bias’ wording is a relic. Let’s move on and study unconscious social categorization effects. Psychological Inquiry, 33(3), 167–172. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2022.2106754
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A crossnational time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. doi:10.1177/0003122411427673
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cloin, M., & Roeters, A. (2015). Drukte aan de vooravond van de participatiesamenleving. Sociale verschillen en trends in de totale tijd besteed aan betaalde en onbetaalde arbeid in Nederland. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 31(4). doi:10.5553/TvA/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cullen, S.M., Cullen, M.A., Band, S., Davis, L., & Lindsay, G. (2011). Supporting fathers to engage with their children’s learning and education: An under-developed aspect of the parent support adviser pilot. British Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 485–500.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dovidio, J.F., & Kunst, J.R. (2022). Delight in disorder: Inclusively defining and operationalizing implicit bias. Psychological Inquiry, 33(3), 177–180. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2022.2106756
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Endendijk, J.J., Derks, B., & Mesman, J. (2018). Does parenthood change implicit gender-role stereotypes and behaviors?Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 61–79. doi:10.1111/jomf.12451
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Europese Commissie. (2018). Report on equality between women and men in the EU. Geraadpleegd via https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/document.cfm?doc_id=50074 (op 17juli2023).
  15. Fisk, S.R., & Ridgeway, C.L. (2018). Framing gender. In B.J.Risman, C.Froyum, & W.Scarborough (red.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 157–171). Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Freund, R.J. & Wilson, W.J. (1998). Regression analysis: Statistical modeling of a response variable (1e ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gawronski, B., Ledgerwood, A., & Eastwick, P.W. (2022). Implicit bias ≠ bias on implicit measures. Psychological Inquiry, 33, 139–155. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2022.2106750
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kinderopvang Werkt. (2022). Wie werken er in de kinderopvang [visual]. Opgehaald 27april2023 van www.kinderopvang-werkt.nl
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Knight, C.R., & Brinton, M.C. (2017). One egalitarianism or several? Two decades of gender-role attitude change in Europe. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 1485–1532. doi:10.1086/689814
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S.J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522–544.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Majdandžić, M., Vente, W., & Bögels, S.M. (2016). Challenging parenting behavior from infancy to toddlerhood: Etiology, measurement, and differences between fathers and mothers. Infancy, 21(4), 423–452. doi:10.1111/infa.12125
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McGill, B.S. (2014). Navigating new norms of involved fatherhood: Employment, fathering attitudes, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1089–1106. doi:10.1177/0192513X14522247
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nosek, B.A., Hawkins, C.B., & Frazier, R.S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(4), 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Parke, R.D. (2002). Fathers and families. In M.H.Bornstein (red.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (3e deel, 2e ed.) (pp. 27–73). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmader, T., Dennehy, T.C., & Baron, A.S. (2022). Why antibias interventions (need not) fail. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 1381–1403. doi:10.1177/17456916211057565
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SCP (2017). Tijdsbestedingsonderzoek 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-x9b-s7tw
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Van den Brakel, M., Portegijs, W., Hermans, B., Perez, S.A., Borghuis, J., Bruin, K.d., . . . SCP. (2020). Emancipatiemonitor 2020. Opgehaald 26april van https://digitaal.scp.nl/emancipatiemonitor2020/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Rijn, I. (2020). Hij, zij of het?Kinderopvang: Inspirerend Betrouwbaar Praktisch, 30(11), 12–14. doi:10.1007/s41189-020-0967-2
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vatcheva, K.P., Lee, M., McCormick, J.B., & Rahbar, M.H. (2016). Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 6(2), 227. doi: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000227.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Von Piekartz, H. (2019, 14juni). Waarom de crèche vrijwel altijd de moeder belt en niet de vader. De Volkskrant.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. West, C., & Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/189945
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.003.SARI
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.003.SARI
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error