A critical reflection on the intersections of mixedness, marriage and conversion among female converts in the Netherlands | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 26, Issue 3/4
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between marriage and conversion from a critical gender perspective, based on a comparative ethnographic study of women’s conversion to Judaism, Islam and Christianity in the Netherlands. In the study of religion and gender, a valuable conceptual framework developed that questions the limited representation of religious women (as somehow ‘oppressed’) and recognises agency within observance. However, up to now, theories and conceptualisations of female conversion have not been able to successfully deal with the tension between individual agency and relationality, more concretely: between individual choice and the impact of intimate relationships. This article suggests a framework more capable of grasping the complexities of conversion and marriage, by introducing the concept of mixedness. In this approach, relationships are understood as agential spaces of religious becoming. Conversion forms and reforms what is ‘mixed’ within a relationship, and intimate relationships indeed play an important role in religious becoming. The goal is to move beyond the binary options that women seem to have to vocalise their process: either they convert because of someone else (implying less agency) or their religious transformation is an expression of autonomous, individual choice (neglecting the impact of relationships). Mixedness highlights the dynamic and fluid aspects of intimate relationships, whilst simultaneously focusing on the interactions between the couples’ experiences of mixedness and social norms of majority and minority religio-racial groups.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.004.SCHR
2023-12-01
2024-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/26/3/4/TVGN2023.3-4.004.SCHR.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.004.SCHR&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arab, P.T. (2018). Amplifying Islam in the European soundscape: Religious pluralism and secularism in the Netherlands. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arweck, E., & Nesbitt, E. (2010). ‘Plurality at close quarters.’Journal of Religion in Europe, 3(1), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1163/187489210X12597383785329
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avishai, O. (2008). ‘Doing religion’ in a secular world: Women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender & Society, 22(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208321131
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Badran, M. (2006). Feminism and conversion: Comparing British, Dutch, and South African life stories. In K.van Nieuwkerk (Ed.), Women Embracing Islam (pp. 192–230). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaman, L. (2013). Opposing polygamy: A matter of equality or patriarchy? In G.Calder & L.Beaman (Eds.), Polygamy’s rights and wrongs: The social family in the culture of rights (pp. 1-21). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beekers, D., & Schrijvers, L.L. (2020). Religion, sexual ethics, and the politics of belonging: Young Muslims and Christians in the Netherlands. Social Compass67 (1): 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768620901664
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bilge, S. (2010). Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860903474102
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowler, K. (2019). The preacher’s wife: The precarious power of evangelical women celebrities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: Contours of a “post-secular” conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097818
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bracke, S. (2011). Subjects of debate: Secular and sexual exceptionalism, and Muslim women in the Netherlands. Feminist Review, 98, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.6
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cerchiaro, F., Aupers, S., & Houtman, D. (2015). Christian-Muslim couples in the Veneto region, northeastern Italy: Dealing with religious pluralism in everyday family life. Social Compass, 62(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768614561151
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cerchiaro, F. (2022). Displaying difference, displaying sameness: Mixed couples’ reflexivity and the narrative-making of the family. Sociology, online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221133218
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Collet, B. (2015). From intermarriage to conjugal mixedness: Theoretical considerations illustrated by empirical data in France. The Annals of the American Academy of political and Social Science, 662(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215595388
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Collet, B. (2017). ‘Conjugal mixedness’ or how to study marital norms and inequalities in interethnic relationships. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 166(4), 143–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fadil, N., & Fernando, M. (2015). Rediscovering the ‘everyday’ Muslim: Notes on an anthropological divide. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.005
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Galonnier, J. (2015). The racialization of Muslims in France and the United States: Some insights from white converts to Islam. Social Compass, 62(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768615601966
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huygens, E. (2022). ‘My dream is that I share the bed with only one man’: Perceptions and practices of premarital sex among Catholic women in Belgium. Social Compass, 69(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686211049676
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalization or another form of ethnocentricism?Sociological Research Online, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jouili, J. (2011). Beyond emancipation: Subjectivities and ethics among women in Europe’s Islamic revival communities. Feminist Review, 98(1), 47–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288860
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lauwers, S. (2022). Religion, secularity, culture? Investigating Christian privilege in Western Europe. Ethnicities, 23(3): 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221106185
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahmood, S. (2004). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, B. (2003). The Pentecostal gender paradox: A cautionary tale for the sociology of religion. In R. K.Fenn (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to sociology of religion (pp. 52–66). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McGuire, M.B. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mepschen, P., Duyvendak, J.W., & Tonkens, E.H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5), 962–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375740.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mossière, G. (2016). The intimate and the stranger: Approaching the ‘Muslim question’ through the eyes of female converts to Islam. Critical Research on Religion, 4(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303216630067
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mossière, G. (2022). When sharing religion is not enough: A transregional perspective on marriage, piety, and the intersecting scales of identity transmission among female converts to Islam in mixed unions. Social Compass, 69(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686221090786
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Özyürek, E. (2014). Being German, becoming Muslim: Race, religion, and conversion in the new Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rau, V. (2023). Between symbolic distancing and following desires: Conversion to Judaism among women in Germany. Religion and Gender, 13(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/18785417-01302008
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schrijvers, L.L. (2021). Embodied conversions and sexual selves: New Jewish, Christian and Muslim women in the Netherlands. In S.J.Page & K.Pilcher (Eds.), Embodying religion, gender and sexuality (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schrijvers, L.L. (2022). Questioning the conversion paradox: Gender, sexuality, and belonging amongst women becoming Jewish, Christian, and Muslim in the Netherlands (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, the Netherlands, and Ghent University, Belgium. https://doi.org/10.33540/1185
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schrijvers, L.L. (forthcoming 2024). Gender, power and conversion in the everyday lives of new Jewish women in the Netherlands. Contemporary Jewry.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Steiner, B. (2016). ‘The German desire to be Jewish’: Conversions of non-Jewish Germans to Judaism after 1945. In T.Parfitt & N.Fisher (Eds.), Becoming Jewish: New Jews and emerging Jewish communities in a globalized world (pp. 156–166). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Topolski, A. (2018). The race-religion constellation: A European contribution to the critical philosophy of race. Critical Philosophy of Race, 6(1), 58-81. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.6.1.0058
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van den Brandt, N., Van den Berg, M., & Meijer, B. (2023). Producing authenticity, difference and extremism: The framing of religious converts in Dutch and Flemish newspapers. Religion and Gender, 13(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1163/1878541701302003
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Nieuwkerk, K. (2008). Biography and choice: Female converts to Islam in the Netherlands. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 19(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410802335515
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Vroon-Najem, V. (2014). Sisters in Islam: Women’s conversion and the politics of belonging: A Dutch case study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vroon-Najem, V., & Moors, A. (2019). Converts, marriage, and the Dutch nation-state: Contestations about Muslim women’s well-being. In M.Tiilikainen, M.Al-Sharmani, & S.Mustasaari (Eds.), Wellbeing of transnational Muslim families: Marriage, law and gender (pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.3/4.004.SCHR
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error