2004
Volume 28, Issue 2/3
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

The framing of singleness as a decision and lifestyle is a relatively new social phenomenon. In this article, I argue for singlehood to be described as an independent social category and identity, not just a relationship status. This argument also allows for a more intersectional approach to discussing singleness, race, gender, and age, as single studies have mainly remained homogenous, focusing on white European and North American women. Historically, the experiences of marriage and motherhood have been dissimilar for women of colour (WOC) in comparison to their white counterparts. My research focuses on the historical and cultural positionality of Women of Colour and how single and childfree WOC construct their identity through their personal experiences and is rooted in self-reliance. These women, who have remained single and childfree, have a distinct point of view, and their narratives can demonstrate how patriarchy, capitalism, and heterogender family structures operate. My research centres on Women of Colour who are not defined by whom they marry or the children they raise. They are creating their own identities, defining their happiness, and using travel as a form of feminist praxis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2025.2-3.002.MART
2025-09-01
2025-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/28/2/3/TVGN2025.2-3.002.MART.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2025.2-3.002.MART&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Goodkind, S. A. (2016). Sex and the Single (Neoliberal) Girl: Perspectives on Being Single Among Socioeconomically Diverse Young Women. Sex Roles, 74(5–6), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0565-y.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackstone, A. (2019). Childfree by Choice: The Movement Redefining Family and Creating a New Age of Independence. Dutton.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2019). ‘Marry a Camel, a Mouse or a Parakeet! The First Guy Who Passes You on the Street!’: Genderizing Marital Status by Othering Jewish Israeli Never-Married Women. Journal of Family Studies, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1200116.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, A. (2003). Developing a Sociological Model for Researching Women’s Self and Social Identities. The European Journal of Women’s Studies10(4), 443–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cancian, F. (1986). The Feminization of Love. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society11(4), 692–709. https://doi.org/10.1086/494272.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment:Vol. No.2 (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection. Race, Gender & Class (Towson, Md.), 1(1), 25–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, P. (2000). Black Feminist Thought. New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Connell, R. (2009). Gender: In World Perspective (2nd ed.). Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper, A. (1892). A Voice from the South: By a Black Woman of the South. 1st ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1(8), 138–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis, A. (1983). Women, Race and Class. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DePaulo, B. (2024). Single at Heart: The Power, Freedom, and Heart-Filling Joy of Single Life.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DePaulo, B., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The Unrecognized Stereotyping and Discrimination Against Singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 15(5), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00446.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DiAngelo, R. J. (2022). White Fragility: Why Understanding Racism Can Be so Hard for White People: Adapted for Young Adults. Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Donaldson, L. E. (1992). Decolonizing Feminisms: Race, Gender & Empire Building. University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferguson, S. (2008). The Crossroads of Identity: Never Married Chinese American Women. International Journal of Sociology of the Family34(2), 235–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Few-Demo, A. L., & Allen, K. R. (2020). Gender, Feminist, and Intersectional Perspectives on Families: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Freeman, S. (2023). African-Caribbean women ageing without children: Does African-Carribean culture and religious identity shape their experiences? Journal of Women & Ageing, 35(1), 49–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gavidia, Pino, L., and Adu, J. (2022). Critical Narrative Inquiry: An Examination of a Methodological Approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods21:160940692210815-. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221081594.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. hooks, bell. (2000). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kislev, E., & Marsh, K. (2023). Intersectionality in studying and theorizing single-hood. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 15(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12522.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lahad, K. (2017). Facing the horror: Becoming an “old maid,” A Table for One: A critical reading of singlehood, gender and time. Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 743–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lugones, M. (2020). Gender and Universality in Colonial Methodology. Critical Philosophy of Race8(1–2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0025.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mandujano-Salazar, Y. Y. (2019). Exploring the Construction of Adulthood and Gender Identity Among Single Childfree People in Mexico and Japan. SAGE Open, 9, 215824401985584. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019855844
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marsh, K., Darity, W., Cohen, P., Casper, L., and Salters. D. (2007). The Emerging Black Middle Class: Single and Living Along. Social Forces86(2), 735–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Marsh, K. (2023). The Love Jones Cohort: Single and Living Alone in the Black Middle Class. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316672754.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Martinez Phillips, K. (2024). The feminization of freedom: An analysis of love, happiness and freedom from the perspective of childfree, never-married single women of color. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 02654075241269667. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241269667.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McCutcheon, DeLoach, K. P., Watkins, K., Burton, E. and Harris, C. (2022). African American Women’s Marital Attitudes: A Qualitative Study on Never Married Women. Journal of Family Issues43(11), 2868–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211035582.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Park, K. (2005). Choosing Childlessness: Weber’s Typology of Action and Motives of the Voluntarily Childless. Sociological Inquiry, 75(3), 372–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00127.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Phillips, K. M. (2023). “We Come Not Here to Talk”—Revisiting the Work of Anna Julia Cooper: An Analysis of Standpoint Theory and Her Placement in the Academic Canon. Symbolic Interaction, 46(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.632
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramirez, J., Vélez-Zapata, C., and RajivMaher. (2024). Green Colonialism and Decolonial Feminism: A Study of Wayúu Women’s Resistance in La Guajira. Human Relations (New York)77(7), 937–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231189610.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ray, R. (2018). Identity of Distance: How Economically Marginalized Black and Latina Women Navigate Risk Discourse and Employ Feminist Ideals. Social Problems65(4), 456–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx025.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reuter, S. Z. (2018). Intersecting ethics of responsibility: Childless academic women and their ambivalence in reproductive decision-making. Women’s Studies International Forum, 70, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.011
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Reynolds, J., & Taylor, S. (2004). Narrating Singleness Life Stories and Deficit Identities. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 197–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharp, E., & Ganong, L. (2011). I’m a Loser, I’m Not Married, Let’s Just All Look at Me: Ever-single women’s perceptions of their social environment. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 956–980.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Simpson, R. (2016). Singleness and Self-identity: The Significance of Partnership Status in the Narratives of Never-married Women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 385–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stahnke, B., Cooley, M. E., & Blackstone, A. (2023). A Systematic Review of Life Satisfaction Experiences Among Childfree Adults. The Family Journal, 31(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807221104795.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Stokes, J., & Moorman, S. (2018). Influence of the social network on married and unmarried older adults’ mental health. The Gerontological Society of America, 58(6), 1109–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Taylor, A. (2012). Theorizing Women’s Singleness: Post-Feminism, Neoliberalism, and the Politics of Popular Culture. In Single Women in Popular Culture: The Limits of Post-Feminism. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (Second). Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Volsche, S. (2017). A Comparison of Mothers and Childfree Women on the Common Characteristics of Romantic Love. SAGE Open, 7(1), 215824401770152-. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701529.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2025.2-3.002.MART
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2025.2-3.002.MART
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error