2004
Volume 38, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

Abstract

The success of statistical reform as a means of improving the quality of quantitative research requires that individual researchers change their interpretation of the results of statistical analyses. For instance, if researchers do not change their habits of dichotomously interpreting p-values, publishing studies regardless of statistical significance may lead to incorrect interpretations of the empirical evidence across studies. Such a publication policy would be beneficial, however, if researchers think meta-analytically and focus on the estimation of effect sizes and confidence intervals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.MULD
2016-09-01
2022-01-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/38/2/08_TVT2016.2.MULD.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.MULD&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.MULD
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2016.2.MULD
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error