2004
Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2019.3.001.SAND
2019-11-01
2021-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/41/3/01_TVT2019.3_SAND.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2019.3.001.SAND&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Biss, E.(2014). On immunity: An inoculation. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.
  2. Boeijinga, A., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J.(2017). Storybridging: Four steps for constructing effective health narratives. Health Education Journal, 76(8), 923-935.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borger, M., Van Hoof, A., & Sanders, J.(2016). Expecting reciprocity: Towards a model of the participants’ perspective on participatory journalism. New Media & Society, 18(5), 708-725.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruner, J.(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  5. Clark, H., & Gerrig, R.(1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764-805.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Graaf, A., Van den Putte, B., Nguyen, M., Zebregs, S., Lammers, J., & Neijens, P.(2017). The effectiveness of narrative versus informational smoking education on smoking beliefs, attitudes and intentions of low-educated adolescents. Psychology & Health, 32(7), 810-825.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Georgakopoulou, A., & Goutsos, D.(2000). Revisiting discourse boundaries: The narrative and non-narrative modes. Text-interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 20(1), 63-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., & Louwerse, M.(2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In: C.Snow & A.Sweet (eds.): Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Green, M. C., & Brock, T.(2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gretter, S., Yadav, A., & Gleason, B. W.(2017). Walking the line between reality and fiction in online spaces: Understanding the effects of narrative transportation. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoeken, H.(2009). Narratieve evidentie, levendigheid en overtuigingskracht. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 31(3), 169-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaspers, J., Spooren, W., Noordman, L., & Vonk, W.(1987). Tegenstellingen en argumentatie. Tijdschrift voor Taal- en tekstwetenschap, 7, 3-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krieken, K. van, Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J.(2017). Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1190.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Krieken, K. van, & Sanders, J.(2017). Framing narrative journalism as a new genre: A case study of the Netherlands. Journalism, 18(10), 1364-1380.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.(1967). Narrative analysis. In: J.Helm (ed): Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History (1997), 7, 3-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Oatley, K.(1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5-6), 439-454.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oatley, K.(2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618-628.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Page, R.(2013). Seriality and storytelling in social media. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 5, 31-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pander Maat, H., & Sanders, T.(2001). Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(3), 247-274.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Polanyi, L.(1982). Literary complexity in everyday storytelling. In: D.Tannen (ed.): Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 155-170). Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rossiter, M., & Garcia, P. A.(2010). Digital storytelling: A new player in the narrative field. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 126, 37-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanders, J.(2010). Intertwined voices: Journalists’ representation modes of source information in journalistic subgenres. English Text Construction, 3(2), 226-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanders, J.(2017). We hebben een verhaal nodig. (Inaugurale rede) Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit. repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/178626
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanders, T., Sanders, J., & Sweetser, E.(2009). Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In: T.Sanders & E.Sweetser (eds.): Causal categories in discourse and cognition (pp. 21-60). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D.(2002). Entertainment–education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-191.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Vis, K., Sanders, J., & Spooren, W.(2015). Quoted discourse in Dutch news narratives. In: A. Lardinois, S.Levie, H. Hoeken & C.Lüthy (eds.): Texts, transmissions, Receptions: Modern approaches to narratives (pp. 152-173). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2019.3.001.SAND
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error