Meertaligheid in Interactie-onderzoek | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-9775
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1236

Abstract

Abstract

In the study of language-and-social-interaction we can distinguish 3 approaches to multilingualism. The first and most basic version is to make the language explicit in which the studied interaction phenomenon was found. The second is to do a comparative study of an interaction phenomenon in different languages. The third is to study data in which different languages are spoken. At this moment the third approach is the least frequent, with the exception of conversation analysis for second language acquisition (CA-for-SLA).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2022.1.003.KOOL
2022-07-01
2024-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15739775/44/1/TVT2022.1.003.KOOL.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2022.1.003.KOOL&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Betz, E., Deppermann, A., Mondada, L. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (red.) (2021) OKAY across languages. Toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F. & Enfield, N. J. (2013) Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items,PlosOnehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S.G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gisladottir, R.S., Kendrick, K.H., Levinson, S.C., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., Enfield, N. J. (2015) Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems, PlosOnehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136100.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (red.) Second Language Conversations, London/New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hellermann, J. (2008) Social Actions for Classroom Learning, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Heritage, J. (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement, in: J.Maxwell Atkinson & JohnHeritage (red.) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 299-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hornberger, N.H. & Chick, K.J. (2001) Co-constructing school safetime: safetalk practices in Peruvian and South African classrooms, in: MonicaHeller, MarilynMartin-Jones (Eds.), Voices of Authority. Education and Linguistics Difference, Westport, Connecticut: Ablex, 31-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kendrick, K.H., Brown, P., Dingemanse, M., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Hayano, K., Hoey, E., Hoymann, G., Manrique, E., Rossi, R., Levinson, S.C. (2020) Sequence organization: A universal infrastructure for social action, Journal of Pragmatics168, 119-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Koole, T. (2012) The epistemics of student problems: Explaining mathematics in a multi-lingual class, Journal of Pragmatics44, 1902-1916.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Levinson, S.C. (2006) On the Human “Interaction Engine”, in: N.J.Enfield & Stephen C.Levinson (red.) Roots of Human Sociality, Oxford, New York: Berg, 39-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mets, B. & van den Hauwe, J. (2003) Masked heterogeneity in a multilingual classroom, Linguistics and Education14(1), 51-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mondada, L. & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2004) Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom, The Modern Language Journal, 88(iv), 501–518.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Penn, C., Watermeyer, J. & Nattrass, R. (2016) Managing language mismatches in emergency calls, Journal of Health Psychologyhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316636497.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Penn, C., Koole, T. & Nattrass, R. (2017) When seconds count: A study of communication variables in the opening segment of emergency calls, International journal of health psychology, 22(10), 1256-1264, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315625357.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ploeg, M. van der, Willemsen, A., Richter, L., Keijzer, M., & Koole, T. (2022) Requests for assistance in the third-age language classroom, Classroom Discourse (E-pub ahead of print).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. (1974) A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation, Language50(4), 696-735.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saussure, F. de ([1915] 1964) Course de Linguistique Générale, Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sert, O. (2010) A Proposal for a CA-Integrated English Language Teacher Education Program in Turkey, The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(3), 62-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seuren, L.M. (2019) Oh (/o/) als ontvanger van informatie in sociale interactie, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing41(2): 363–389.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sidnell, J. (red.) (2009), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J.P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S.C. (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation, PNAS106(26), 10587–10592.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Thije, J. D. (2022). Meertalig perspectief voor de Nederlandse taalbeheersing. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 44(1), 3-23.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVT2022.1.003.KOOL
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error