2004
Volume 8 Number 2-3
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Samenvatting

Abstract

This article studies the fate of a contradiction between practice and prescriptive text in 16th-century Ashkenaz. The practice was fleeing a plagued city, which contradicted a Talmudic passage requiring self-isolation at home when plague strikes. The emergence of this contradiction as a halakhic problem and its various forms of resolution are analyzed as a case study for the development of halakhic literature in early modern Ashkenaz.

The Talmudic text was not considered a challenge to the accepted practice prior to the early modern period. The conflict between practice and Talmud gradually emerged as a halakhic problem in 15th-century rabbinic sources. These sources mixed legal and non-legal material, leaving the status of this contradiction ambiguous. The 16th century saw a variety of solutions to the problem in different halakhic writings, each with their own dynamics, type of authority, possibilities, and limitations. This variety reflects the crystallization of separate genres of halakhic literature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2020014
2020-12-16
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/8/2-3/22124810_008_02-03_s003_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2020014&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2020014
Loading
  • Soort artikel: Research Article
Keyword(s): early modern; Jewish law; plague
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error