2004
Volume 9, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Samenvatting

Abstract

Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of religion and conscience. The language of Article 9(1) has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights as including protections for acts of proselytism, when properly committed and respectful of the rights and freedoms of others. This was the view taken in the foundational Article 9 case of the Court, v. . In the decades since , however, the view of the Court on proselytism appears to have shifted, in particular in Article 9 cases involving religious garments. This article seeks to determine whether the Court is consistent in its views on proselytism between these religious garment cases and earlier examples of Article 9 case law.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2021J005
2021-11-22
2026-01-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/9/2-3/22124810_009_02-03_s004_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2021J005&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-2021J005
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error