OA

Beyond Singular Methodologies: Studying Semi-Autonomous Normative Systems and Their Modalities

References

1. Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. John Murray, 1832.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benedict XVI. “Address to the Bundestag”. Apostolic Journey to Germany, Berlin, September22–25, 2011.
3. Bjarup, Jes. “The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism”, Ratio Juris18 (2005): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2005.00282.x.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burgess, J. Peter. “Law and Cultural Identity”. ARENA Working Papers14 (1997) https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/1994-2000/1997/wp97_14.htm.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CIC. Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Ioannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus. Acta Apostolicae Sedis75/2 (1983).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Charles E.“The Function of Law in a Democratic Society”. The University of Chicago Law Review9 (1942): 394.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cloke, Paul, ChristopherBaker, CallumSutherland, and AndrewWilliams, eds. Geographiesof Postsecularity: Re-Envisioning Politics, Subjectivity and Ethics. Routledge, 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Duve, Thomas. “Was ist ›Multinormativität‹? – Einführende Bemerkungen”. Rechtsgeschichte25 (2017): 88–101. https://doi.org/10.12946/rg25/088-101.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Errázuriz, Carlos José. “What is Canon Law and what is it for?”January21, 2025. www.omnesmag.com/en/resources-2/what-is-canon-law-and-what-is-it-for.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Finnis, John M.“Natural Law Theories”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta and UriNodelman. Summer 2025 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2025/entries/natural-law-theories/.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Foljanty, Lena. Recht oder Gesetz: Juristische Identität und Autorität in den Naturrechtsdebatten der Nachkriegszeit. Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Francis. “Address During the Ceremony Commemorating the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Institution of the Synod of Bishops”. The Holy See. October17, 2014. www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2015/october/documents/papa-francesco_20151017_50-anniversario-sinodo.html.
13. Francis. “Address to the Officials of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota for the Inauguration of the Judicial Year”. The Holy See. January31, 2025. www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2025/january/documents/20250131-inaugurazione-rota-romana.html.
14. Francis. “Apostolic Constitution Pascite gregem Dei of the Holy Father Francis Reforming Book VI of the Code of Canon Law”. The Holy See. May23, 2021. www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_constitutions/documents/papa-francesco_costituzione-ap_20210523_pascite-gregem-dei.html.
15. Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. Basic Books, 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
16. German Basic Law. Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, translated by ChristianTomuschat, David P.Currie, Donald P.Kommers, and RaymondKerr, in cooperation with the Language Service of the German Bundestag. Accessed June30, 2025. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Greeley, Andrew. The Catholic Imagination. University of California Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Green, Leslie, and ThomasAdams. “Legal Positivism”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta. Winter 2019 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/legal-positivism/.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Habermas, Jürgen. Between Naturalism and Religion. Polity, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Habermas, Jürgen. Europe: The Faltering Project. Polity, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hahn, Judith. “Dissent as Deviance: Sociological Observations on Structural Conflicts in Church”. In Dissenting Church: Exploring the Theological Power of Conflict and Disagreement, edited by JudithGruber, MichaelSchüßler, and RyszardBobrowicz. Palgrave Macmillan, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hahn, Judith. Foundations of a Sociology of Canon Law. Springer, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hahn, Judith. “‘Salus Animarum Suprema Lex’: How Does This Principle of Canon Law Relate to the ‘End of Law’?”. Political Theology (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2025.2465934.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, 1961.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hecke, Simon. Kanonisches Recht: Zur Rechtsbildung und Rechtsstruktur des römischkatholischen Kirchenrechts. Springer, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Helmholz, Richard H.“The Bible in the Service of the Canon Law”. Chicago-Kent Law Review70 (1994): 1557–1581.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hirschl, Ran. Constitutional Theocracy. Harvard University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. The Common Law. Little, Brown, and Company, 1881.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Huels, John M.“Interpreting Canon Lawin Diverse Cultures”. The Jurist47 (1987): 249-293.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Huizing, Peter J., and Ladislas M.Orsy. “Roman Cathodic Canon Law”. Encyclopaedia Britannica. February19, 2025. www.britannica.com/topic/canon-law/The-Second-Vatican-Council-and-postconciliar-canon-law.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kirchhof, Reik. Grundlegung einer Soziologie der Scharia: Das islamische Recht im Licht einer neuen Theorie der normativen Ordnung und des Rechts. Springer, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kleinhans, Martha-Marie, and Roderick A.Macdonald. “What is a Critical Legal Pluralism?”Canadian Journal of Law and Society12, no. 2 (1997): 25–46.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kuttner, Stephan. “Natural Law and Canon Law”. Proceedings of the University of Notre Dame Natural Law Institute3 (1950): 85–97.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Laborde, Cécile. Liberalism’s Religion. Harvard University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Leiter, Brian. “Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered”. Ethics111, no. 2 (2001): 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1086/233474.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Leo XIII. “Immortale Dei: Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on the Christian Constitution of States”. The Holy See. November1, 1885. https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_01111885_immortale-dei.html.
37. Mitnick, Eric J.“Law, Cognition, and Identity”. Louisiana Law Review67, no. 3 (2007): 823–869.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moore, Sally Falk. “Law and Anthropology”. Biennial Review of Anthropology6 (1969): 252–300.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Moore, Sally Falk. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study”. Law & Society Review7 (1973): 719–746.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Moore, Sally Falk. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. Routledge & K. Paul, 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pospíšil, Leopold J.Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. Harper & Row, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Radbruch, Gustav. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Final Report, vol. 16, Religious Institutions, Book 1. Commonwealth of Australia, 2017. Available at www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sarat, Austin, and JonathanSimon. “Beyond Legal Realism?: Cultural Analysis, Cultural Studies, and the Situation of Legal Scholarship”. Yale Journal of Law & The Humanities13, no. 3 (2001): 3–32.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schauer, Frederick. “Legal Realism Untamed”. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, 2012-38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064837.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schonthal, Benjamin. “Buddhist Legal Pluralism? Looking Again at Monastic Governance in Modern South and Southeast Asia”. Buddhism, Law& Society3 (2018): 7–37.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schonthal, Benjamin. “The Cunning of Legal Pluralism: Unity and Multiplicity in Buddhist Law”. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law54, no. 1 (2022): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2022.2040141.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schreiter, Robert. Constructing Local Theologies. Orbis Books, 1985.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Shorter, Aylward. Toward a Theology of Inculturation. Wipf & Stock, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Stępień, Mateusz, and WojciechZomerski. “Exploring Legislative Placebo: A New Framework for Understanding Deliberate Ineffective Legislation”. The Theory and Practice of Legislation13 (2025): 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tamanaha, Brian Z.Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford University Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Teubner, Gunther. “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World-Society”. In Global Law without a State, edited by GuntherTeubner. Dartmouth, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Trevino, A. Javier. “The Influence of Sociology on American Jurisprudence: From Oliver Wendell Holmes to Critical Legal Studies”. Mid-American Review of Sociology18, no. 1/2 (1994): 23–46.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ungureanu, Camil. “Uses and Abuses of Postsecularism. An Introduction”. In Democracy, Law and Religious Pluralism in Europe, edited by FerranRequejo and CamilUngureanu. Routledge, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Valdrini, Patrick. “Roman Catholic Canon Law”. St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology. February29, 2024. www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/RomanCatholicCanonLaw.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Villegas, Diana. L’ordre juridique mafieux: Étude à partir du cas de l’organisation criminelle colombienne des années 1980 et 1990. Dalloz, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wolf, Anna-Lena. “Sozial- und kulturanthropologische Zugänge zu Religionen und Recht am Beispiel einer Untersuchung verschiedener Perspektiven auf göttliches Recht im katholischen Kirchenrecht”. In Zugänge zu Recht und Religionen: Interdisziplinäre Sondierung eines weiten Forschungsfeldes, edited by MarkusBrodthage and DieterKrimphove. Nomos, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]