2004
Volume 79, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

Abstract

In 1903, the famous Jewish scholar Solomon Schechter articulated his belief that Higher Bible Criticism was not merely a scholarly endeavor but a tool that could fuel antisemitism. Higher Criticism as a scientific method for the study of the Hebrew Bible had originated in Germany in the nineteenth century and was mostly practiced by Protestant scholars. The name most associated with Higher Criticism is Julius Wellhausen whose work (1883) is indeed laced with supersessionist and openly anti-Jewish remarks. Jewish scholars of the so-called objected to Higher Criticism as they felt that the Christians had “stolen the Bible” from the Jews. Yet there were also Jewish scholars of that day who were attracted to some of Wellhausen’s ideas, such as his predilection for the prophetic voice in the Bible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2025.3.003.TEUG
2025-08-01
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barton, John. “Jewish and Christian Approaches to Biblical Theology.” In Protestant Bible Scholarship: Antisemitism, Philosemitism and Anti-Judaism, edited by Arjen F.Bakker, RenéBloch, YaelFisch, PaulaFredriksen, and HindyNajman. Brill, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Old Testament Theology and the Jewish-Christian Connection.”Journal for the Study of the Old Testament9, no. 28 (1984): 3-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blenkinsopp, Joseph. Prophecy and Canon: A Contribution to the Study of Jewish Origins. University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brettler, Marc Zvi. How to Read the Bible. Jewish Publication Society, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chrysostom, Saint John. Discourses Against Judaizing Christians. Translated by Paul W.Harkins. The Fathers of the Church 68. The Catholic University of America Press, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elrefaei, Aly. Wellhausen and Kaufmann: Ancient Israel and Its Religious History in the Works of Julius Wellhausen and Yehezkel Kaufmann. BZAW 490. De Gruyter, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Endelman, Todd. Leaving the Jewish Fold. Princeton University Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fredriksen, Paula, and OdedIrshai. “Christian Anti-Judaism: Polemics and Policies.” In The Cambridge History of Judaism: The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period, edited by Steven T.Katz. The Cambridge History of Judaism 4. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Graf, Karl Heinrich. “Die sogenannte Grundschrift des Pentateuchs.” In Archiv für wissenschaftliche Erforschung des Alten Testamentes, edited by AdalbertMerx. Verlag des Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses, 1869.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HaCohen, Ran. Reclaiming the Hebrew Bible: German-Jewish Reception of Biblical Criticism. DeGruyter, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hertz, Deborah. How Jews Became Germans: The History of Conversion and Assimilation in Berlin. 1st edition. Yale University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heschel, Susannah. Abraham Geiger and the Jewish Jesus. University of Chicago Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaufmann, Yechezkel. History of the Israelite Religion [Toledot Ha-’Emunah Ha-Yisre’elit Mi-Yeme Ḳedem ‘ad Sof Bayit Sheni]. 4 vols. Bialik Institute, 1937.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Levenson, Alan. “Jewish Responses to Modern Biblical Criticism: Some Reflections and a Course Proposal.”Shofar12, no. 3 (1994): 100-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Levenson, Jon D.The Hebrew Bible, The Old Testament, and Historical Criticism. Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Liwak, Rüdiger. “Exegese zwischen Apologie und Kontroverse. Benno Jacob als jüdischer Bibelwissenschaftler.” In Mazel tov: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Christentum und Judentum; Festschrift anlässlich des 50. Geburtstages des Instituts Kirche und Judentum, edited by MarkusWitte and TanjaPilger. Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Plietzsch, Susanne. “Hermeneutik des Konkreten. Die Propheten als Repräsentanten Israels bei Julius Wellhausen und Abraham Geiger.” In Deutsch-jüdische Bibelwissenschaft: Historische, exegetische und theologische Perspektiven, edited by DanielVorpahl, SophiaKähler, and ShaniTzoref. Europäisch-Jüdische Studien 40. De Gruyter, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Radford Ruether, Rosemary. Faith and Fratricide: The Theological Roots of Anti-Semitism. Seabury, 1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Radford Ruether, Rosemary. “The Adversus Judaeos Tradition in the Church Fathers: The Exegesis of Christian Anti-Judaism.” In Essential Papers on Judaism and Christianity in Conflict: From Late Antiquity to the Reformation, edited by JeremyCohen. New York University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rendtorff, Rolf. “Die jüdische Bibel und ihre antijüdische Auslegung.” In Auschwitz-Krise der christlichen Theologie, edited by RolfRendtorff and EkkehardStegemann. Kaiser, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sarason, Richard S.“Toward a New Agendum for the Study of Rabbinic Midrashic Literature.” In Studies in Aggadah, Targum and Jewish Liturgy, edited by Jakob J.Petuchowski and EzraFleischer. Magnes Press, 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schechter, Solomon. “Higher Criticism-Higher Antisemitism.” In Seminary Addresses and Other Papers. Ark Publishing, 1915.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schmid, Konrad. “Hintere Propheten (Nebiim).” In Grundinformation Altes Testament: Dritter Hauptteil Die Literatur Des Alten Testaments, edited by Jan ChristianGertz. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmid, Konrad. “The Prophets after the Law or the Law after the Prophets? Terminological, Biblical, and Historical Perspectives.” In The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America, edited by Jan ChristianGertz, Bernard M.Levinson, DalitRom-Shiloni, and KonradSchmid. Mohr Siebeck, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmid, Konrad. “The Rise and Fall of the Notion of ‘Spätjudentum’ in Christian Biblical Scholarship.” In Protestant Bible Scholarship: Antisemitism, Philosemitism and Anti-Judaism, edited by Arjen F.Bakker, PaulaFredriksen, YaelFisch, HindyNajman, and RenéBloch. Brill, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schorsch, Ismar. “In the Shadow of Wellhausen: Heinrich Graetz as a Biblical Critic.”JSQ109, no. 3 (2019): 384-405.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schreckenberg, Heinz. Die christlichen Adversus-Judaeos-Texte und ihr literarisches und historisches Umfeld (1.-11. Jh.). Peter Lang, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Smend, Rudolf, ed. Julius Wellhausen: Briefe. Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smend, Rudolf, ed. “Wellhausen und das Judentum: In dankbarer Erinnerung an Isac Leo Seeligmann (1907-1982).”Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche79 (1982): 249-282.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stemberger, G.Judaica Minora Teil II: Geschichte und Literatur des rabbinischen Judentums. Mohr Siebeck, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wellhausen, Julius. Die Pharisäer und die Sadducäer: Eine Untersuchung zur inneren jüdischen Geschichte. L. Bamberg, 1874.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wellhausen, Julius. Israelitische und jüdische Geschichte (1895). De Gruyter, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wellhausen, Julius. Prolegomena to the History of Ancient Israel: With a Reprint of the Article Israel from the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Peter Smith, 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wellhausen, Julius. Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels. Reimer, 1905.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wellhausen, Julius. Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels: Mit einem Stellenregister. 6th ed. De Gruyter, 1927.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wiese, Christian. Challenging Colonial Discourse: Jewish Studies and Protestant Theology in Wilhelmine Germany. Brill, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wiese, Christian. “Ein ‘Schrei ins Leere’? Die Wissenschaft des Judentums und ihre Auseinandersetzung mit den Judentumsbildern des Protestantismus am Beispiel Benno Jacobs.” In Die Exegese hat das erste Wort: Beiträge zu Leben und Werk Benno Jacobs, edited by WalterJacob and AlmuthJürgensen. Calwer, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zirkle, Alexandra. “Heinrich Graetz and the Exegetical Contours of Modern Jewish History.”Jewish Quarterly Review109, no. 3 (2019): 360-383.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zunz, Leopold. Die gottesdienstlichen Vorträge der Juden historisch entwickelt; ein Beitrag zur Alterthumskunde und biblischen Kritik, zur Literatur- und Religionsgeschichte. Asher, 1832.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2025.3.003.TEUG
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error