“This is the story of a man called Stanley”

References

1. Augustine. “De libero arbitrio.” In On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Translated by PeterKing. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Backe, Hans-Jaochim, and Jan-NoëlThon. “Playing with Identity Authors, Narrators, and Players in The Stanley Parable and The Beginner’s Guide.”Diegesis8, no. 2 (2019), 1-25.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Edited by HenryHardy. Oxford University Press, 2002.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beyvers, Sarah. “The Game of Narrative Authority: Subversive Wandering and Unreliable Narration in The Stanly Parable.”Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds12, no. 1 (2020): 7-21.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bódi, Bettina. Videogames and Agency. Routledge, 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bosman, Frank. G.Moral Conversion and Video Games: The Case of Spec Ops: The Line. Routledge, forthcoming.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bosman, Frank. G.“There is No Solution: Wicked Problems in Digital Games.”Games and Culture14, no. 5 (2019): 543-59.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bosman, Frank G., and Archibaldvan Wieringen. Games as Art: A Communication-Oriented Perspective of the Relationship between Gaming and the Art. De Gruyter, 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Canino, Andrew. “To See You Made Humble: Agency and Ethos in The Stanley Parable.” In The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom, edited by RichardColby, MatthewJohnson, and RebekahShultz Colby. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ciccoricco, David. “How to Play a Parable Author(s).”Storyworlds10, no. 1-2 (2018): 21-46.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Costiuc, Stanislav. “What is a Meta-Game?”Game Developer, February21, 2019. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/what-is-a-meta-game-.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crossan, Dominic. “Parable.” In The Anchor Bible Dictionary. Vol. 5. Edited by David NoelFreedman. Doubleday, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Djuth, Marianne. “Grace and Free Will.”The Oxford Handbook of the Pelagian controversy, edited by AnthonyDupont, GuilioMalavasi, and BrianMatz. Oxford University Press, 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fest, Bradley. “Metaproceduralism: The Stanley Parable and the Legacies of Postmodern Metafiction.”Wide Screen6, no. 1 (2016): 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jensen, Alexander. Divine Providence and Human Agency: Trinity, Creation and Freedom. Routledge, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kafka, Franz. “A Report to an Academy.” In The Metamorphosis and Other Stories. Translated by JoyceCrick. Oxford University Press, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lynn, Lottie. “Stanley Parable: All Endings and How Many Endings There Are Explained.”Euro Gamer, April27, 2022, https://www.eurogamer.net/the-stanleyparable-all-endings-how-many-9022.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Marsili, Lorenzo, and NiccoloMilanese. Citizens of Nowhere: How Europe Can Be Saved from Itself. Zed Book, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Oschmann, Dirk. “Skeptische Anthropologie Kafka und Nietsche.” In Friedrich Nietzsche und die Literatur der klassischen Moderne, edited by ThorstenValk. De Gruyter, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Planells de la Maza, Antonio José. Possible Worlds in Video Games: From Classic Narrative to Meaningful Actions. Carnegie Mellon University, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Quesnell, Quentin. “Grace.” In The New Dictionary of Theology, edited by JosephKomonchak, MaryCollins and DermotLane. Gill and Macmillan, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sarian, Antranig Arek. “Paradox and Pedagogy in The Stanley Parable.”Games and Culture15, no. 2 (2020): 179-97.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Scanlon, Mike, TomSwanson, PaulDarvasi, and JenJenson. “The First Door: Gender, Authority and Choice in The Stanley Parable.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Association for Computing Machinery, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Scott, Peter. Theology, Ideology and Liberation: Towards a Liberative Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Zhu, Feng. “The Freedom of Alienated Reflexive Subjectivity in The Stanley Parable.”Convergence16, no. 1 (2020): 116-34.
    [Google Scholar]