2004
Volume 80, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, I reflect on the current status of the academic study of religion in the Netherlands, in particular on the relationship between theology and religious studies. I present the findings of 18 interviews with theologians and religious studies scholars of the Radboud University Nijmegen, the University of Groningen and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, exploring how the relationship between theology and religious studies is perceived at these institutions. The image that surfaces is that of a magnetic field with opposing poles, reflecting a persistent dichotomy in how theology and religious studies are understood. However, a closer examination reveals a more nuanced and heterogeneous reality. To capture this complexity, I introduce the perspective-attitude matrix, an interpretative tool designed to illuminate the relational and contextual aspects of the discussion. Adopting such a context-sensitive approach to the debate on theology and religious studies can contribute to a more integrated and fruitful future for the academic study of religion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2026.1.001.BOUM
2026-04-01
2026-04-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Academion. SEP Evaluation Faculty of Religion and Theology 2018-2023 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. 2025. https://vu.nl/en/research/more-about/quality-of-research.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Joel, HanneJacobs, JustinKroesen, KristinaLiefke, CatrinWilliams, CatherineWilson, MaartenHoltzapffel, and MarietteHuisjes. Research Evaluation 2025 Research Institute of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies. 2025,
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Van den Bosch, Lourens. “Theologie en godsdienstwetenschap in een nieuw millennium.” In Trends in de Groninger Theologie. “You need a Busload of Faith to get by” (Lou Reed). Edited by EdwardNoort & HettyZock). Eburon, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cannell, Fenella. “Introduction: The Anthropology of Christianity.” In The Anthropology of Christianity. Edited by FenellaCannel. Duke University Press, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fountain, Philip. «Toward a Post-secular Anthropology.»The Australian Journal of Anthropology24, no. 3 (2013): 310–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Frijhoff, Willem, RainerAlbertz, DavidChidester, Hans-GünterHeimbrock, and KeithWard. Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities (QANU). Research Review Theology & Religious Studies. Utrecht, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Klaar Om Te Wenden… De Academische Bestudering van Religie in Nederland: Een Verkenning. Edited by EdNoort, RuardGanzevoort, Pierrevan Hecke, BirgitMeyer, AnneliesMoors, and PeterNissen. KNAW, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Molendijk, Arie L.The Emergence of the Science of Religion in the Netherlands. Brill, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Robbins, Joel. “World Christianity and the Reorganization of Disciplines: On the Emerging Dialogue between Anthropology and Theology.” In Theologically Engaged Anthropology, edited by J. DerrickLemons. Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodrigues, Hillary Peter, and John S.Harding. Introduction to the Study of Religion. Routledge, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rug.nl. “Position of the Board regarding Research Evaluation RCS 2018-2023.” Accessed July25, 2025. https://www.rug.nl/about-ug/organization/quality-assurance/research/position-of-the-board-re-research-evaluation-rcs-2018-23.pdf
  12. Ru.nl. “ScherpStellen. Beleidsplan voor de Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen 2023-2027.” Accessed August26, 2025. https://www.ru.nl/sites/default/files/2023-05/ru_ftr_beleidsplan_nl_2023-2027_def.pdf
  13. Ter Keurs, Pieter, Martinvan Gelderen, Dorothea ElbereKuster, PeterWard, MarcelPoorthuis, VeronicaCibotaru, and KirstenSmeets. SEP Evaluation Faculty of Religion and Theology 2018-2023 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Academion, 2025. https://vu.nl/en/research/more-about/quality-of-research
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tolstoj, Katja, and Ritavan der Schriek-Hermans, Research Selfevaluation Report Faculty of Religion and Theology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 2018-2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ukrant.nl. “Godgeleerdheid krijgt nieuwe: ‘Er is een gat tussen ons imago en wat we doen’.” Accessed May9, 2025. https://ukrant.nl/godgeleerdheid-krijgt-nieuwe-naam-er-is-een-gat-tussen-ons-imago-en-wat-we-doen/.
  16. Vervenne, Marc, NadiaFadial, Anders KlostergaardPetersen, Suvi-MariaSaarelainen, and SarahWisialowski, Research Evaluation Centre for Religious Studies 2018-2023. 2024. https://www.rug.nl/about-ug/organization/quality-assurance/research/crs-final-prc-report-20241009.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wach, Joachim. Religionswissenschaft. Prolegomena zu ihrer wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung. J.C. Hinrichs, 1924.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2026.1.001.BOUM
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2026.1.001.BOUM
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contextuality; institutionalisation; methodology; religious studies; theology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error