2004
Volume 80, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Samenvatting

Abstract

This article examines the entangled relationship between theology and modern governance through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s account of political and economic theologies. Engaging with Agamben’s works, such as and the study analyses how Agamben draws on Carl Schmitt’s analysis of political theology to reconstruct genealogically discourses on political theology and economic theology. The article claims that through his account of economic theology, Agamben highlights the theological and religious foundations that have informed and shaped modern capitalist, economic, and political structures. Unlike Schmitt who focuses only on divine sovereignty, Agamben also analyses and puts emphasis on divine economy and providence. In doing so, he does not only confirm the thesis of the secularisation of political concepts but also provides a new critique of modernity dominated according to him by managerial and dispersed model of governance. However, I claim that the current global context, increasingly marked by the resurgence of authoritarianism, populism, and the normalisation of emergency rules, challenges Agamben’s thesis of dispersed managerial governance and re-asserts political theology itself not as a shadow of the past, but as the governing logic of the present, which may be described as “authoritarian governmentality.”

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2026.1.003.MPAS
2026-04-01
2026-04-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, G.Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by DanielHeller-Roazen. Stanford University Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agamben, G.The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Translated by PatriciaDailey. Stanford University Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Agamben, G.State of Exception. Translated by KevinAttell. The University of Chicago Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Agamben, G.The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Translated by LorenzoChiesa. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Agamben, G.The Use of Bodies. Translated by AdamKotsko. Stanford University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Agamben, G.Where are we now? The Epidemic as Politics. Eris Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Benjamin, W.“Theses on the Philosophy of History.” In Illuminations, edited by HannahArendt. Translated by HarryZohn. Schocken, 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Benjamin, W.“Critique of Violence.” In Reflections, edited by PeterDemetz. Translated by EdmundJephcott. Schocken, 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cimino, A.“Agamben’s Political Messianism in ‘The Time That Remains’.”International Journal of Philosophy and Theology77, no. 3 (2016): 102-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Colebrook, C. & Maxwell, J.Agamben. Polity Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dean, M.“What is Economic Theology? A New Governmental-Political Paradigm?”Theory, Culture and Society36, no.3 (2018): 3-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean, M.“The Signature of Power.”Journal of Political Power5, no.1 (2012): 101–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean, M.“The Concept of Authoritarian Governmentality Today.”Global Society, 39, no. 1 (2025): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De la Durantaye, L.Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford University Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flohr, M.“Political Theology: Origins, Concepts, and Contradictions.”Theory, Culture & Society42, no. 6 (2025): 43-59. Accessed July10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764241311250.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jessica, W.“‘The King Reigns but He Doesn’t Govern:’ Thinking Sovereignty and Government with Agamben, Foucault and Rousseau,” In Agamben and Law, edited by ThonasZartaloudis. Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Karsenti, B.“Agamben et le mystère du gouvernement.”Critique5, no. 744 (2009): 355-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kotsko, A.“Genealogy and Political Theology: On Method in Agamben’s the Kingdom and the Glory.”Political Theology14, no. 1 (2013): 107–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kotsko, A.“Giorgio Agamben, theology and economy: Il Regno e la Gloria. Faith and Theology.” Accessed June8, 2025. https://www.faith-theology.com/2008/07/giorgio-agamben-theology-and-economy-il.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kotsko, A.“Agamben Notes: Table of Contents.” Accessed June10, 2025. https://itself.blog/2008/06/11/agamben-notes-table-of-contents/.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mbembe, A.“Necropolitics.”Public Culture15, no. 1 (2003): 11–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mills, C.Biopolitics. Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray, A.Giorgio Agamben. Routledge, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson, E.Theological Tractates. Translation by MichaelHollerich. Stanford University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Primera, G. E.The Political Ontology of Giorgio Agamben. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Primera, G. E.“Potentiality, Sovereignty and Bare Life. A Critical Reading of Giorgio Agamben.”Ideas y Valores63, no. 156 (2014): 79–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Primera, G. E.“Economic Theology, Governance and Neoliberalism: Lessons of The Kingdom and the Glory.”Praktyka Teoretyczna3, no. 17 (2015): 106–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Prozorov, S.“A Farewell to Homo Sacer? Sovereign Power and Bare Life in Agamben’s Coronavirus Commentary.”Law and Critique34, no. 1 (2023): 63-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rankin, J.“Viktor Orbán Sparks Outrage with Attack on ‘Race Mixing’ in Europe.”The Guardian, July24, 2022. Accessed August11, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/24/viktor-orban-against-race-mixing-europe-hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ross, A.“Agamben’s Political Paradigm of the Camp: Its Features and Reasons.”Constellations19, no. 3 (2012): 421–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmitt, C.Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by GeorgeSchwab. The University of Chicago Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Toscano, A.“Divine Management.”Angelaki16, no. 3 (2011): 125-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Leeuwen, A. Th.De Nacht van het Kapitaal. Ambo, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Whyte, J.“’The King Reigns but He Doesn’t Govern’: Thinking Sovereignty and Government with Agamben, Foucault and Rousseau.” In Agamben and Law, edited by ThonasZartaloudis. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2026.1.003.MPAS
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error