2004
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1566-7146
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1611

Abstract

Abstract

This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the role of seigneuries by examining the nature of social relations within the lay seigneurie of Herzele between 1444 and 1502. Drawing on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of domain and bailiff accounts, the research is structured around four case studies: the ‘beste kateil’, the ‘wandelkoop’, a financial assessment, and criminal justice. Across all these domains, a consistent pattern emerges: while the rules were applied uniformly, they were interpreted with a sensitivity to context. A structural space for negotiation was typically embedded in the system, allowing compromises to be reached between those who were entitled to receive—the lord and his officials—and those who were expected to give—the local inhabitants. When punishments were imposed, it was ensured they were enforceable. After all, all parties had a shared interest in the smooth functioning of the seigneurie.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PM2025.2.007.HOEV
2025-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PM2025.2.007.HOEV
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/PM2025.2.007.HOEV
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error