oa Pressie en argumentatie in maatschappelijke discussies

References

1. Amgoud, L., & Prade, H.(2006). Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue. In S.Parsons, N.Maudet, P.Moraitis, & I.Rahwan (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems: Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 26, 2005: Revised selected and invited papers (pp. 88-103). Berlijn: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Du Pré, R. (2016, 26 oktober). ‘Nederland moet voortouw nemen bij klimaatdoelen.’ Volkskrant (rubriek Ten Eerste), p. 4.
   [Google Scholar]
3. D66(2016). D66 Verkiezingsprogramma 2017-2021. Geraadpleegd op 2 januari 2018, https://d66.nl/content/uploads/sites/2/2016/12/Definitieve-VKP.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, F.H. van, (2016). Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation30, 1-23.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R.(2000). Kritische discussie. Meppel: Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R.(2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ihnen Jory, C.(2016). Negotiation and deliberation: Grasping the difference. Argumentation30, 145-165.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jacobs, S.(2009). Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In Frans H.van Eemeren and BartGarssen (Eds.), Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues (pp. 55-78). Houten: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Laar, J.A van., & Krabbe, E.C.W. (2016a). Eerlijke en oneerlijke strategieën in maatschappelijke discussies. In D.Van De Mierop, L.Buysse, R.Coesemans, & P.Gillaerts (Red.), De macht van de taal: Taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 131-143), Leuven: Acco.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Laar, J.A. van, & Krabbe, E.C.W. (2016b). Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context5(3), 316-348.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Laar, J.A. van, & Krabbe, E.C.W. (2016c). Splitting a difference of opinion. In P.Bondy, & L.Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-21, 2016. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Laar, J.A. van, & Krabbe, E.C.W.(2018). The role of argument in negotiation. Argumentation, 32(4), 549-567.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Nieuwsdienst (2011, 13 mei). Staatssecretaris Bleker ontkent druk op natuurbeschermer. Algemeen Dagblad, p. 4
    [Google Scholar]
14. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., & Metcalfe, D.(2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Walton, D.N.(1998). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Walton, D.N.(2000). Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Walton, D.N.(2014). A dialectical analysis of the Ad Baculum Fallacy. Informal Logic, 34, 276-310.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Walton, D.N, & Krabbe, E.C.W.(1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Wij Stoppen Kool(2015). Wij zijn niet te stoppen, klimaatverandering wel! Geraadpleegd op 3 januari 2018, www.wijstoppensteenkool.nl/?p = 7628
    [Google Scholar]
20. Woods, J.(2004). The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]