Ovid’s Cephalus and the dangers of mistranslation | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 56, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

This paper considers misunderstandings found within the story of Cephalus and Procris in 7, misunderstandings that are regularly repeated in the scholarly interpretations and English translations of this episode. The interpretive challenges posed by Cephalus’ tale are indeed akin to those faced by the Ovidian translator, whose interpretive choices will influence how later readers construe his often ambiguous words. Whereas others see Cephalus as an unreliable narrator whose claim to have been raped by Aurora is open to doubt, I argue that his words are best read as he tells us to read them. Misunderstanding is due not to Cephalus’ unreliability but to the interpretive challenges posed by the changeable Ovidian world he inhabits, a world that is labyrinthine and ambiguous. Ovid himself helps us navigate the mazelike structure of Cephalus’ narrative by verbal clues and intra-/intertextual parallels that clearly align Cephalus with other rape victims in the epic. By understanding Cephalus first and foremost as a rape victim, his actions and words become more intelligible and shed light on the themes of rape, masculinity, and power within the epic as a whole.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.1.002.MCCA
2023-03-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahl, F.1985. Metaformations. Soundplay and wordplay in Ovid and other classical poets, Ithaca.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Curran, L.1978. ‘Rape and Rape Victims in the Metamorphoses’, Arethusa11, 213-241.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davidson, J.1997. ‘Antoninus Liberalis and the Story of Prokris’, Mnemosyne50, 165-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis, G.1983. The Death of Procris. Amor and the hunt in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Rome.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Freas, D.2018. ‘Da femina ne sim. Gender, genre, and violence in Ovid’s Caenis episode’, Classical Journal114, 60-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson, R.K.2003. Ovid, Ars Amatoria Book 3, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GreenP.1979. ‘The Innocence of Procris. Ovid A.A. 3.687-746’, Classical Journal75, 15-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fontenrose, J.1980. ‘Ovid’s Procris’, Classical Journal75, 289-294.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Heath, J.1991. ‘Diana’s Understanding of Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Classical Journal86, 233-243.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hejduk, J.D.2011. ‘Death by Elegy. Ovid’s Cephalus and Procris’, Transactions of the American Philological Association141, 285-314.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinds, S.2002. ‘Landscape with figures. Aesthetics of place in the Metamorphoses and its tradition’, in P.Hardie (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, Cambridge, 122-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, P.2007. Reading Ovid. Stories from the Metamorphoses, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Labate, M.1975. ‘Amore coniugale e amore “elegiaco” nell’episodio di Cefalo e Procri (Ov., Met., 7, 661-865)’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa5, 103-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Louden, B.1999. The Odyssey. Structure, narration, and meaning, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Maltby, R.1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies, Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayor, J.M.B.2017. Power Play in Latin Love Elegy and its Multiple Forms of Continuity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Murray, A.T.1919. Homer. Odyssey, Volume I: Books 1-12 (revised by G.E.Dimock), Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McCarter, S.2018a. ‘Is Homer’s Calypso a Feminist Icon or a Rapist?’, Electric Literature, electricliterature.com/is-homers-calypso-a-feminist-icon-or-a-rapist (accessed 9September2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McCarter, S2018b. ‘Rape, Lost in Translation. How translators of Ovid’s Metamorphoses turn an assault into a consensual encounter’, Electric Literature, electricliterature.com/rape-lost-in-translation (accessed 9June2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McCarter, S.2022a. ‘Ovid’s Callisto and Feminist Translation of the Metamorphoses’, EuGeStA12, 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McCarter, S.2022b. Ovid, Metamorphoses, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nguyen, N.L.2006. ‘Roman Rape. An overview of Roman rape laws from the Republican period to Justinian’s reign’, Michigan Journal of Gender and the Law13, 75-112.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Packman, Z.M.1993. ‘Call it Rape. A motif in Roman Comedy and its suppression in English-speaking publications’, Helios20, 42-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Papaioannou, S.2017. ‘Epic Middles and Epic Awareness in the Narrative of Cephalus and Procris in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Paideia: rivista di filologia, ermeneutica e critica letteraria72, 239-260.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pechillo, M.1990. ‘Ovid’s Framing Technique. The Aeacus and Cephalus epyllion (Met. 7.490-8.5)’, Classical Journal86, 35-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Peek, P.2004. ‘Cephalus’ Incredible Narration. Metamorphoses 7.661-865’, Latomus63, 605-614.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pöschl, V.1959. ‘Kephalos und Prokris in Ovids Metamorphosen’, Hermes87, 328-343.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rimell, V.2006. Ovid’s Lovers. Desire, difference and the poetic imagination, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Romeo, A.2020. ‘Cephalus’s Autobiographical Narrative (Metamorphoses 7.690-865). Between epic models and the conventions of rhetoric’, Arethusa53, 157-174.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rufo, K.M.2016. ‘Circe’s Understanding of Rape Victims in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, XIV’, New England Classical Journal43, 203-240.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sabot, A.1985. ‘Heur et malheur d’un amour conjugal: Céphale et Procris (Ovide, Métamorphoses, VII, 661-862)’, in J.M.Frégaut and D.Porte (eds), Journées ovidiennes de Parmenie, 199-214.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Saylor, C.2008. ‘The Gifts of Procris’, Mnemosyne61, 651-658.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Segal, C.1978. ‘Ovid’s Cephalus and Procris. Myth and Tragedy’, Grazer Beiträge7, 175-205.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tarrant, R.J.1995. ‘The Silence of Cephalus. Text and narrative technique in Ovid, Metamorphoses 7.685ff.’, Transactions of the American Philological Association125, 99-111.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tarrant, R.J., 2004. P. Ovidi Nasonis Metamorphoses, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tarrant, R.J.2005. ‘Roads Not Taken. Untold stories in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici54, 65-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tissol, G.1997. The Face of Nature. Wit, narrative, and cosmic origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilson, E.R.2018. Homer. The Odyssey, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wohl, V.J.1993. ‘Standing by the Stathmos. The creation of sexual ideology in the Odyssey’, Arethusa26, 19-50.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.1.002.MCCA
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2023.1.002.MCCA
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error