2004
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0921-5077
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7235

Abstract

Learning while working? Karasek's active learning hypothesis revisited

Learning while working? Karasek's active learning hypothesis revisited

J. Van Ruysseveldt & J. Taverniers, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 23, March 2010, nr. 1, pp. 0-00

Using Structural Equation Modeling (Amos 5), a research model in which the assumptions underlying Karasek's active learning hypothesis were specified, refined and supplemented, was tested on a heterogeneous sample of the Dutch working population (N = 1229). We assumed that (a) task complexity, autonomy and work pressure influence the development of new competencies, and (b) task-related and interactional learning possibilities mediate this relation. Three more or less competing structural models (no, partial and full mediation) were tested. As hypothesized, the full mediation model showed the best fit to the data: the relation between task complexity, autonomy and work pressure on the one hand and the development of new competencies on the other was fully mediated by task related and interactional learning possibilities. Task complexity played an important role in workplace learning processes, while high work pressure seemed to hinder competency development. In addition to ensuring the safety, health and well-being of employees, the (re)design of workplaces should also take into account the extent to which the work promotes workplace learning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/2010.023.001.001
2010-03-01
2021-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/2010.023.001.001
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error