2004
Volume 108, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

Although Thomas More is an exemplary figure of both personal and moral integrity, his is not straightforwardly ‘integer’ in another meaning of the term, i.e., it does not unequivocally describe a ‘whole, intact or pure’ conception of the ideal society. Rather, is patently ambiguous and challenges the reader to disambiguate the narrative and to make up his own mind on how to construct the ideal society. In this paper, I analyze utopias and dystopias in general as evaluative thought experiments that appeal to our imagination and deploy possible worlds. Subsequently, I argue that More’s is a successful evaluative thought experiment that actually underscores More’s integrity, because by means of its exacerbated ambiguity, it both triggers and properly respects the deliberation and evaluation of the reader in his capacity as thought experimenter.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2016.3.MEY
2016-08-22
2021-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00025275/108/3/09_ANTW2016.3.MEY.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2016.3.MEY&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2016.3.MEY
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ambiguity; integrity; thought experiment; Utopia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error