2004
Volume 111, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

In his text “Killer Robots”, Robert Sparrow holds that killer robots should be forbidden. This conclusion is based on two premises. The first is that attributive responsibility is a necessary condition for admitting an action; the second premise is that the use of killer robots is accompanied by a responsibility gap. Although there are good reasons to conclude that killer robots should be banned, the article shows that Sparrow's argument for the ban is not correct.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2019.4.006.LAUW
2019-11-01
2021-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ceulemans, C.(2011)Over oorlog en ethiek. De traditie van de rechtvaardige oorlog in theorie en praktijk. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.
  2. Coeckelbergh, M.(2009)Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents, AI & Soc24, pp. 181-159.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuypers, S. E.(2007)Het concept van morele verantwoordelijkheid in de hedendaagse analytische wijsbegeerte, in: Lessen voor de XXIste eeuw. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven, pp. 75-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GalliotJ.(2015)Military Robots: Mapping the Moral Landscape. New York: Routledge.
  5. Lokhorst, G.-J. and van den Hoven, J.(2014)Responsibility for Military Robots, in P.Lin, K.Abney & G.Bekey (red.) Robot Ethics. The Ethical and Social Implications of Robots. London/Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 145-156.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Henriksen, A. & Ringsmose, J.(2015)Drone warfare and morality in riskless war, Global Affairs3, pp. 285-291.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jha, U. J.(2016)Killer Robots. New Dehli: Vij Books India, Pvt Ltd.
  8. Johansson, L.(2010)The Functional Morality of Robots, International Journal of Technoethics4, pp. 65-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, D. G.(2015)Technology with No Human Responsibility?, Journal for Business Ethics127, pp. 707-715.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Leveringhaus, A.(2016)Ethics and Autonomous Weapons. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Leveringhaus, A.(2018)What’s So Bad About Killer Robots?, Journal of Applied Philosophy35, pp. 341-358.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Matthias, A.(2004)The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata, Ethics and Innformation Technology6, pp. 175-183.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Müller, V. C.(2016)Automous Killer Robots Are Probably Good News, in E.Di Nucci & F.Santioni (red.) Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on the Use of Remotely Controlled Weapons. London: Ashgate, pp. 67-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nagel, T.(1979)Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Robillard, M.(2018)No Such Thing as Killer Robots, Journal of Applied Philosophy35, pp. 705-717.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Simpson, T. W. and Müller, V.(2016)Just War and Robots’ Killings, The Philosophical Quarterly66, pp. 302-322.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sparrow, R.(2007)Killer Robots, Journal of Applied Philosophy24, pp. 62-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Walzer, M.(1977)Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2019.4.006.LAUW
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): AI; ethiek; Just War Theory; LAWS; oorlog; Robert Sparrow; technologie
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error