2004
Volume 112, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

Against the dominant trends of the scientification and naturalization of philosophy and the concurrent reduction of traditions of practical wisdom to private opinions, this article pleads for a revaluation of philosophy’s original relation with wisdom. It does so by shedding a philosophical light on several related aspects of wisdom through three different lenses. The first one, taken from Aristotle, explores the relation between theoretical and practical wisdom, leading to the conclusion that practical wisdom has to confront general moral principles with particular situations. The second lens, taken from Kant, argues that wisdom offers existential orientation, which requires the combination of an external and an internal moral principle. Yet, the external principle cannot be determined univocally because it is not empirically given. This lack of univocity raises the question of the fate of wisdom in our times, marked by a plurality of existential points of orientation. With the help of a third lens, stemming from Ricoeur, it will be argued that universal moral rules should be amendable to enrichment by ‘potential universals’ embedded in foreign cultures, thus creating a situation of reflexive equilibrium between theoretical and practical wisdom.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.3.002.JONK
2020-08-01
2021-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aristotle
    Aristotle, Complete Works. The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by JonathanBarnes (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).
  2. JohnCottingham, ‘Philosophy and Self-improvement. Continuity and Change in Philosophy’s Self-conception from the Classical to the Early-modern Era’, in Philosophy as a Way of Life. Ancients and Moderns, ed. by MichaelChase, Stephen R.L.Clark, MichaelMcGhee (Chichester: Wiley, 2013), pp. 148-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. TrevorCurnow, Wisdom. A History (London: Reaktion Books, 2015).
  4. RenéDescartes, Oeuvres de Descartes [Edition Adam et Tannery]. Tome VI: Discours de la méthode; Tome IX/2: Principes de la philosophie (Paris: Vrin, 1996).
  5. MarkusDüwell, ‘Human dignity: concepts, discussions, philosophical perspectives’, in Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by MarcusDüwell, JensBraarvig, RogerBrownsword, and DietmarMieth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 23-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PierreHadot, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? (Paris: Gallimard, 1995).
  7. PierreHadot, Discours et mode de vie philosophique (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2014).
  8. Georg Wilhelm FriedrichHegel, Gesammelte Werke. Band 9: Die Phänomenologie des Geistes, ed. by WolfgangBonsiepen and ReinhardHeede (Hamburg: Meiner, 1980).
  9. PeterJonkers, ‘A Reasonable Faith? Pope Benedict’s Response to Rawls’, in Rawls and Religion, ed. by TomBailey and ValentinaGentile (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015), pp. 221-241.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PeterJonkers, ‘A Revaluation of Wisdom to Reconnect Philosophy with the Life-world’, in Philosophy and the Life World, ed. by HeXirong, PeterJonkers, and ShiYongze (Washington DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2017), pp. 41-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PeterJonkers, ‘Serving the World through Wisdom. A Plea for a Revitalization of the Wisdom Traditions in Christian Faith’, in Envisioning Futures for the Catholic Church, ed. by Staf Hellemans and Peter Jonkers (Washington DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2018), pp. 73-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PeterJonkers, ‘Philosophy and (Christian) Wisdom’, in Philosophy as Love of Wisdom and Its Relevance to the Global Crisis of Meaning, ed. by PatrickLaude and PeterJonkers (Washington DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2019), pp. 29-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ImmanuelKant, Werke in zehn Bänden. Band 5: Schriften zur Metaphysik und Logik, ed. by WilhelmWeischedel (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Daniel A.Kaufman, ‘Knowledge, Wisdom, and the Philosopher’, Philosophy81(2006), pp. 129-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OdoMarquard, ‘Drei Betrachtungen zum Thema Philosophie und Weisheit’, in Philosophie und Weisheit, ed. by WilliOelmüller (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1989), pp. 275-287.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MauriceMerleau-Ponty, Éloge de la philosophie et autres essais (Paris: Gallimard, 1960).
  17. RobertNozick, ‘What Is Wisdom and Why Do Philosophers Love It So?’, in Idem, The Examined Life. Philosophical Meditations (New York: Touchstone, 1989), pp. 267-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MarthaNussbaum, The fragility of goodness. Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
  19. Plato
    Plato, Complete Works, ed. and intr. by John M.Cooper (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997).
  20. PaulRicoeur, Soi-même comme un autre (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1990).
  21. AndreasSpeer, ‘Weisheit’, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Band 12, ed. by JoachimRitter, KarlfriedGründer and GottfriedGabriel (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2004), pp. 371-397.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. CharlesTaylor, Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.3.002.JONK
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aristotle; existential orientation; Kant; philosophy; reflexive equilibrium; Ricoeur; wisdom
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error